A Comparative Study on Aesthetic and Pain Outcomes in Flap Versus Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Paredes, Kenneth Aleman [1 ]
Castillo, Jennifer V. [2 ]
Quevedo, Mauricio Montelongo [2 ]
Ocejo, Arantza [3 ]
Lechuga, Hector A. Vazquez [4 ]
Camara, Karime M. Navarro [5 ]
Figueroa, Daniela Ponce [6 ]
Garcia, Diana K. Falcon [7 ]
Mendoza, Carina L. Nolasco [1 ]
Castillo, Jaqueline L. [2 ]
Enriquez, Jose A. Victoria [8 ]
Valdes, Jose R. Flores [9 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Reg 220 Jose Vicente Villada, Surg, Toluca, Mexico
[2] Univ Autonoma Guadalajara, Gen Med, Guadalajara, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Guadalajara, Gynecol, Guadalajara, Mexico
[4] Univ Juarez Estado de Durango, Med & Nutr, Durango, Mexico
[5] Univ Autonoma Guadalajara, Surg, Guadalajara, Mexico
[6] Inst Estudios Super Tamaulipas, Gen Med, Tampico, Mexico
[7] Univ Juarez Autonoma Tabasco, Hlth Sci, Villahermosa, Mexico
[8] Univ Autonoma Estado de Mexico, Gen Surg, Toluca, Mexico
[9] Oncol Consultants PA, Res, Houston, TX 77024 USA
关键词
primary breast malignancy; breast flap; plastic and reconstructive surgery; breast implant; radical mastectomy; COMPLICATIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.63772
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. Surgical treatments, including mastectomy and subsequent breast reconstruction, are critical components of breast cancer management. This systematic review compares the outcomes of flap versus implant reconstruction post-mastectomy, focusing on aesthetic differences, pain, recovery, and psychological adaptation. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect databases. Inclusion criteria targeted studies comparing aesthetic outcomes, pain, recovery costs, duration, and psychological adaptation between flap and implant breast reconstructions. We excluded non-English and non-Spanish studies, case reports, and those without full-text availability. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). From an initial pool of 25,881 articles, 16 high-quality studies involving 14,196 participants were selected for synthesis. Flap reconstruction was associated with higher patient satisfaction regarding aesthetic outcomes and psychological well-being but also had higher complication rates, including infections and wound dehiscence. Implant reconstruction showed fewer complications but did not achieve the same level of patient satisfaction. Flap reconstruction, despite its higher complication rates, tends to provide superior aesthetic and psychological outcomes compared to implant reconstruction. These findings highlight the importance of personalized treatment plans considering individual patient needs and preferences. Future research should focus on long-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and standardized outcome measures to further delineate the comparative effectiveness of these reconstruction techniques. Personalized care and ongoing research are essential to improving the quality of life for breast cancer survivors undergoing reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Capsular flap for coverage of an exposed implant after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction
    Brandstetter, Michael
    Schoeller, Thomas
    Puelzl, Petra
    Schubert, Heinrich
    Wechselberger, Gottfried
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2010, 63 (08): : 1388 - 1390
  • [22] Prognosis of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy Flap Necrosis: Predictors of Failure and Salvage
    Kim, Woo-Ju
    Park, Se-Yeon
    Mun, Goo-Hyun
    Bang, Sa-Ik
    Jeon, Byung-Joon
    Pyon, Jai-Kyong
    Lee, Kyeong-Tae
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2025,
  • [23] Optimizing the Mastectomy Flap to Improve Aesthetic Outcomes
    Salibian, Ara A.
    Frey, Jordan D.
    Choi, Mihye
    Karp, Nolan S.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2020, 40 : S1 - S12
  • [24] Does the addition of mesh improve outcomes in implant based breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer?
    Potter, Shelley
    MacKenzie, Mairead
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 362
  • [25] Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
    E. Bijkerk
    S. M. J. van Kuijk
    J. Beugels
    A. J. M. Cornelissen
    E. M. Heuts
    R. R. W. J. van der Hulst
    S. M. H. Tuinder
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2019, 175 : 369 - 378
  • [26] Discussion: Patient Satisfaction with Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, Latissimus Flap, and Implant Techniques
    Beahm, Elisabeth K.
    Walton, Robert L.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 125 (06) : 1596 - 1598
  • [27] Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
    Bijkerk, E.
    van Kuijk, S. M. J.
    Beugels, J.
    Cornelissen, A. J. M.
    Heuts, E. M.
    van der Hulst, R. R. W. J.
    Tuinder, S. M. H.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 175 (02) : 369 - 378
  • [28] Breast reconstruction using a latissimus dorsi flap after mastectomy
    Hojvig, Jens B.
    Bonde, Christian T.
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 62 (12):
  • [29] Secondary breast reconstruction after mastectomy using the DIEP flap
    Hauck, T.
    Horch, R. E.
    Schmitz, M.
    Arkudas, A.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2018, 27 (03): : 513 - 513