Evaluating error sources to improve precision in the co-registration of underwater 3D models

被引:1
|
作者
Lechene, Marine A. A. [1 ,2 ]
Figueira, Will F. [3 ]
Murray, Nicholas J. [1 ]
Aston, Eoghan A. [1 ,2 ]
Gordon, Sophie E. [2 ]
Ferrari, Renata [2 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, 1 James Cook Dr, Douglas, Qld 4811, Australia
[2] Australian Inst Marine Sci, Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Co-registration; Precision; 3D model; Change detection; Photogrammetry; STRUCTURE-FROM-MOTION; STRUCTURAL COMPLEXITY; CORAL; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; ACCURACY; IMPACT; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102632
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Change detection is an essential and widely used approach for investigating ecosystem dynamics. Multi-temporal 3D models increasingly underpin photogrammetry-based analyses of change for many ecologically relevant attributes. To detect change, it is necessary to accurately align 3D models collected at different times using a process referred to as co-registration. However, achieving precise co-registration is difficult in underwater habitats due to practical challenges intrinsic to surveying them. These include a lack of accurate georeferencing information, variable light, turbidity and weather conditions, and diving restrictions dictated by the diver's pressure exposure over time. Here we present an efficient co-registration workflow for 3D models that directly addresses these challenges, derived from underwater structure-from-motion methods. To test our approach, we used 3D models from across a wide range of coral reef habitats covering all those that one may encounter in shallow reefs (15 m depth and above). We then identified and empirically estimated four key sources of error: coregistration, 3D processing, image acquisition, and reference and scaling features (RSF) placement, and quantified their relative contributions to the overall error. Our proposed co-registration workflow had a mean precision of 1.37 +/- 16.55 mm. Image acquisition and RSF placement errors contributed the most to the total workflow error (37% and 53%, respectively), while the contribution of co-registration and 3D processing errors was minimal (3% and 7%, respectively). As a result of our analysis, we provide 'good practice' guidelines to reduce errors associated with photogrammetric workflows and to facilitate efficient and reliable detection of 3D change in complex underwater ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Co-registration of Surfaces by 3D Least Squares Matching
    Akca, Devrim
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 76 (03): : 307 - 318
  • [2] MEG and 3D Digitization Co-registration of Head Using 3D Hough Transform
    Lin, Sheng Kai
    Lo, Rong Chin
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOLOGICAL, MEDICAL AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING (BMCE 2013), 2013, : 653 - 656
  • [3] Automatic 3D Surface Co-Registration Using Keypoint Matching
    Persad, Ravi Ancil
    Armenakis, Costas
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 83 (02): : 137 - 151
  • [4] Co-registration of 3D echo and MR data to create physical models of congenital heart malformations
    Tyler Moore
    Erin J Madriago
    Eric S Renteria
    Cristina Fuss
    David J Sahn
    Del Shepard
    Michael Silberbach
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17 (Suppl 1)
  • [5] AUTOMATIC CO-REGISTRATION OF MEG AND 3D DIGITIZATION USING 3D GENERALIZED HOUGH TRANSFORM
    Lin, Sheng-Kai
    Lo, Rong-Chin
    Lee, Ren-Guey
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING-APPLICATIONS BASIS COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 32 (03):
  • [6] Automatic co-registration of 3D multi-sensor point clouds
    Persad, Ravi Ancil
    Armenakis, Costas
    ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 130 : 162 - 186
  • [7] Accuracy of 3D CT/MRI co-registration in planning epilepsy surgery
    Hawes-Ebersole, S
    Tao, JX
    Shah, S
    Baldwin, M
    Erickson, RK
    Ebersole, JS
    EPILEPSIA, 2005, 46 : 241 - 241
  • [8] Automatic Co-Registration of Pan-Tilt-Zoom (PTZ) Video Images with 3D Wireframe Models
    Persad, Ravi Ancil
    Armenakis, Costas
    Sohn, Gunho
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 81 (11): : 847 - 859
  • [9] New 3D Bolton standards: Co-registration of biplane x-rays and 3D CT
    Dean, D
    Subramanyan, K
    Kim, EK
    IMAGE PROCESSING - MEDICAL IMAGING 1997, PTS 1 AND 2, 1997, 3034 : 541 - 549
  • [10] EEG–MRI Co-registration and Sensor Labeling Using a 3D Laser Scanner
    L. Koessler
    T. Cecchin
    O. Caspary
    A. Benhadid
    H. Vespignani
    L. Maillard
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2011, 39 : 983 - 995