Evaluating error sources to improve precision in the co-registration of underwater 3D models

被引:1
|
作者
Lechene, Marine A. A. [1 ,2 ]
Figueira, Will F. [3 ]
Murray, Nicholas J. [1 ]
Aston, Eoghan A. [1 ,2 ]
Gordon, Sophie E. [2 ]
Ferrari, Renata [2 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, 1 James Cook Dr, Douglas, Qld 4811, Australia
[2] Australian Inst Marine Sci, Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Co-registration; Precision; 3D model; Change detection; Photogrammetry; STRUCTURE-FROM-MOTION; STRUCTURAL COMPLEXITY; CORAL; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; ACCURACY; IMPACT; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102632
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Change detection is an essential and widely used approach for investigating ecosystem dynamics. Multi-temporal 3D models increasingly underpin photogrammetry-based analyses of change for many ecologically relevant attributes. To detect change, it is necessary to accurately align 3D models collected at different times using a process referred to as co-registration. However, achieving precise co-registration is difficult in underwater habitats due to practical challenges intrinsic to surveying them. These include a lack of accurate georeferencing information, variable light, turbidity and weather conditions, and diving restrictions dictated by the diver's pressure exposure over time. Here we present an efficient co-registration workflow for 3D models that directly addresses these challenges, derived from underwater structure-from-motion methods. To test our approach, we used 3D models from across a wide range of coral reef habitats covering all those that one may encounter in shallow reefs (15 m depth and above). We then identified and empirically estimated four key sources of error: coregistration, 3D processing, image acquisition, and reference and scaling features (RSF) placement, and quantified their relative contributions to the overall error. Our proposed co-registration workflow had a mean precision of 1.37 +/- 16.55 mm. Image acquisition and RSF placement errors contributed the most to the total workflow error (37% and 53%, respectively), while the contribution of co-registration and 3D processing errors was minimal (3% and 7%, respectively). As a result of our analysis, we provide 'good practice' guidelines to reduce errors associated with photogrammetric workflows and to facilitate efficient and reliable detection of 3D change in complex underwater ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ASSESSMENT OF CO-REGISTRATION BETWEEN 3D ANGIOGRAPHY AND IVUS. AN IN VIVO FEASABILITY STUDY
    Ligthart, Jurgen
    Witberg, Karen
    Slots, Tristan
    Karanasos, Antonios
    Regar, Evelyn
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (12) : A1790 - A1790
  • [22] 3D digitizing precision and sources of error in the geometric analysis of weasel skulls
    Reig, S
    ACTA ZOOLOGICA ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARUM HUNGARICAE, 1998, 44 (1-2): : 61 - 72
  • [23] Proposal for an accurate TMS-MRI co-registration process via 3D laser scanning
    Hironaga, Naruhito
    Kimura, Takahiro
    Mitsudo, Takako
    Gunji, Atsuko
    Iwata, Makoto
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2019, 144 : 30 - 39
  • [24] Multibeam 3D Underwater SLAM with Probabilistic Registration
    Palomer, Albert
    Ridao, Pere
    Ribas, David
    SENSORS, 2016, 16 (04):
  • [25] 3-D CT and MRI co-registration in the assessment of cochlear implantation
    Neri, E
    Berrettini, S
    Salvatori, L
    Forli, F
    Franceschini, SS
    Bartolozzi, C
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2005, 11 (10): : MT63 - MT67
  • [26] Reliable 3D surface acquisition, registration and validation using statistical error models
    Guehring, J
    THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 3-D DIGITAL IMAGING AND MODELING, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 224 - 231
  • [27] Bit-error sources in 3D optical memory: experiments and models
    Lawrence, AF
    Stuart, JA
    Singh, DL
    Birge, RR
    ADVANCED OPTICAL MEMORIES AND INTERFACES TO COMPUTER STORAGE, 1998, 3468 : 258 - 268
  • [28] Evaluating 2D/3D registration accuracy
    LaRose, D
    Bayouth, J
    Kanade, T
    CARS 2000: COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2000, 1214 : 147 - 152
  • [29] Automated texture registration on 3d models
    Pelagotti, A.
    Uccheddu, F.
    Picchioni, F.
    IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR REMOTE SENSING XVII, 2011, 8180
  • [30] Heterogeneous Data Registration for 3D Underwater Scene Reconstruction
    Thanh Huy Nguyen
    Gueriot, Didier
    Le Caillec, Jean-Marc
    Sintes, Christophe
    Daniel, Sylvie
    OCEANS 2017 - ANCHORAGE, 2017,