COMPARING THE SPATIOTEMPORAL TRAVEL PATTERNS AND INFLUENCING FACTORS OF BIKE SHARING AND E- BIKE SHARING SYSTEMS

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Shishuo [1 ,2 ]
Du, Mingyi [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Haizhi [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Sikai [2 ,3 ]
Li, Fangning [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Sch Geomat & Urban Spatial Informat, 15 Yongyuan Rd, Beijing 102616, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources Peoples Republ China, Key Lab Urban Spatial Informat, 15 Yongyuan Rd, Beijing 102616, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Urban Construct Explorat & Surveying Desi, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
关键词
Micromobility; bike sharing; e-bike sharing; spatiotemporal travel patterns; spatiotemporal correlation analysis; MGWR;
D O I
10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-339-2023
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
The emergence of micromobility, exemplified by bike sharing and e-bike sharing systems, has ushered in a low-carbon, environmentally friendly, and sustainable revolution in urban transportation. This transformative shift addresses the " first and last mile" challenge and holds immense potential for urban mobility enhancement. Nevertheless, the existing literature predominantly investigates the spatiotemporal travel patterns and influencing factors of bike sharing and e-bike sharing systems in isolation, overlooking comparative analyses grounded in quantitative methodologies. In order to fill this gap, this study first compares and analysis their spatiotemporal travel patterns, which are measured by travel distance, travel time, and travel volume. A Multiscale Geoweighted Regression (MGWR) model was constructed using various data sources, such as Point of Interest (POI) data, metro station data, and bus stop data, to conduct a spatiotemporal correlation analysis of land use and public transport factors with the travel volume of the shared system. Our study centers on Manhattan, New York City, utilizing data from May 2022 for both bike sharing and e-bike sharing systems. The study analysis reveals that hourly trip volumes are higher for bike sharing than for e-bike sharing, exhibiting substantial spatial variation across different regions within the city. The MGWR model's findings suggest that educational facilities exert a negative influence on bike sharing in the northeast and on e-bike sharing trips in the central region, with this impact being more pronounced on weekends. Similarly, cultural facilities negatively affect the Central region's bike sharing system and the citywide e-bike sharing system, with a milder effect during weekends. Moreover, bus stops exhibit a significant negative impact on bike sharing and e-bike sharing at Chelsea Waterside Park (only weekdays), while displaying a positive influence on both systems during weekends. To validate the MGWR model's efficacy, we conducted a comparative analysis with a Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) model. The results demonstrate that MGWR can be more effective in correlating and quantitatively explaining the effects of different factors on spatiotemporal travel patterns. In conclusion, this study furnishes valuable insights for optimizing urban infrastructure rebalancing strategies and advancing sustainable urban infrastructure development.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 345
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Visual analysis of bike-sharing systems
    Oliveira, Guilherme N.
    Sotomayor, Jose L.
    Torchelsen, Rafael P.
    Silva, Claudio T.
    Comba, Joao L. D.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & GRAPHICS-UK, 2016, 60 : 119 - 129
  • [42] Understanding Spatiotemporal Patterns of Biking Behavior by Analyzing Massive Bike Sharing Data in Chicago
    Zhou, Xiaolu
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10):
  • [43] Mode Choice Effects on Bike Sharing Systems
    Kowald, Matthias
    Gutjar, Margarita
    Roeth, Kai
    Schiller, Christian
    Dannewald, Till
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [44] A mixed rebalancing strategy in bike sharing systems
    Xu, Guoxun
    Xiang, Ting
    Li, Yanfeng
    Li, Jun
    Guo, Qiang
    [J]. ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 54 (07) : 1160 - 1177
  • [45] Balancing bike sharing systems with constraint programming
    Luca Di Gaspero
    Andrea Rendl
    Tommaso Urli
    [J]. Constraints, 2016, 21 : 318 - 348
  • [46] A STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS OF BIKE-SHARING SYSTEMS
    Tao, Shuang
    Pender, Jamol
    [J]. PROBABILITY IN THE ENGINEERING AND INFORMATIONAL SCIENCES, 2021, 35 (04) : 781 - 838
  • [47] Understanding bike sharing travel patterns: An analysis of trip data from eight cities
    Kou, Zhaoyu
    Cai, Hua
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2019, 515 : 785 - 797
  • [48] Bike Usage Forecasting for Optimal Rebalancing Operations in Bike-Sharing Systems
    Ruffieux, Simon
    Mugellini, Elena
    Abou Khaled, Omar
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 30TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOOLS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ICTAI), 2018, : 854 - 858
  • [49] Cycling into the workshop: e-bike and m-bike mobility patterns for predictive maintenance in Barcelona's bike-sharing system
    Grau-Escolano, Jordi
    Bassolas, Aleix
    Vicens, Julian
    [J]. EPJ DATA SCIENCE, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [50] Quality of Service Measure for Bike Sharing Systems
    Ashqar, Huthaifa, I
    Elhenawy, Mohammed
    Rakha, Hesham A.
    House, Leanna
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 23 (09) : 15841 - 15849