COMPARING THE SPATIOTEMPORAL TRAVEL PATTERNS AND INFLUENCING FACTORS OF BIKE SHARING AND E- BIKE SHARING SYSTEMS

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Shishuo [1 ,2 ]
Du, Mingyi [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Haizhi [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Sikai [2 ,3 ]
Li, Fangning [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Sch Geomat & Urban Spatial Informat, 15 Yongyuan Rd, Beijing 102616, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources Peoples Republ China, Key Lab Urban Spatial Informat, 15 Yongyuan Rd, Beijing 102616, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Urban Construct Explorat & Surveying Desi, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
关键词
Micromobility; bike sharing; e-bike sharing; spatiotemporal travel patterns; spatiotemporal correlation analysis; MGWR;
D O I
10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-339-2023
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
The emergence of micromobility, exemplified by bike sharing and e-bike sharing systems, has ushered in a low-carbon, environmentally friendly, and sustainable revolution in urban transportation. This transformative shift addresses the " first and last mile" challenge and holds immense potential for urban mobility enhancement. Nevertheless, the existing literature predominantly investigates the spatiotemporal travel patterns and influencing factors of bike sharing and e-bike sharing systems in isolation, overlooking comparative analyses grounded in quantitative methodologies. In order to fill this gap, this study first compares and analysis their spatiotemporal travel patterns, which are measured by travel distance, travel time, and travel volume. A Multiscale Geoweighted Regression (MGWR) model was constructed using various data sources, such as Point of Interest (POI) data, metro station data, and bus stop data, to conduct a spatiotemporal correlation analysis of land use and public transport factors with the travel volume of the shared system. Our study centers on Manhattan, New York City, utilizing data from May 2022 for both bike sharing and e-bike sharing systems. The study analysis reveals that hourly trip volumes are higher for bike sharing than for e-bike sharing, exhibiting substantial spatial variation across different regions within the city. The MGWR model's findings suggest that educational facilities exert a negative influence on bike sharing in the northeast and on e-bike sharing trips in the central region, with this impact being more pronounced on weekends. Similarly, cultural facilities negatively affect the Central region's bike sharing system and the citywide e-bike sharing system, with a milder effect during weekends. Moreover, bus stops exhibit a significant negative impact on bike sharing and e-bike sharing at Chelsea Waterside Park (only weekdays), while displaying a positive influence on both systems during weekends. To validate the MGWR model's efficacy, we conducted a comparative analysis with a Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) model. The results demonstrate that MGWR can be more effective in correlating and quantitatively explaining the effects of different factors on spatiotemporal travel patterns. In conclusion, this study furnishes valuable insights for optimizing urban infrastructure rebalancing strategies and advancing sustainable urban infrastructure development.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 345
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Understanding bike trip patterns leveraging bike sharing system open data
    Chen, Longbiao
    Ma, Xiaojuan
    Thi-Mai-Trang Nguyen
    Pan, Gang
    Jakubowicz, Jeremie
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2017, 11 (01) : 38 - 48
  • [32] Inferring Bike Trip Patterns from Bike Sharing System Open Data
    Chen, Longbiao
    Jakubowicz, Jeremie
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA, 2015, : 2898 - 2900
  • [33] Exploiting Interpretable Patterns for Flow Prediction in Dockless Bike Sharing Systems
    Gu, Jingjing
    Zhou, Qiang
    Yang, Jingyuan
    Liu, Yanchi
    Zhuang, Fuzhen
    Zhao, Yanchao
    Xiong, Hui
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2022, 34 (02) : 640 - 652
  • [34] Free-Floating Bike Sharing in Jiangsu: Users' Behaviors and Influencing Factors
    Li, Xuefeng
    Zhang, Yong
    Sun, Li
    Liu, Qiyang
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (07)
  • [35] The survival of bike-sharing startups in China: an empirical analysis of the influencing factors
    Zhou, Yan
    Park, Sangmoon
    Wang, Qifeng
    Zhang, Justin Zuopeng
    Behl, Abhishek
    [J]. KYBERNETES, 2023, 52 (02) : 566 - 584
  • [36] Factors influencing the market share of e-bike sharing: evidence from New York City
    Zhang, Xiao
    Zheng, Rong
    Huo, Jinghai
    Yang, Hongtai
    Jiang, Yangsheng
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION, 2023,
  • [37] Predicting Bike Usage and Optimizing Operations at Repair Shops in Bike Sharing Systems
    Alzaman, Chaher
    Aljuneidi, Tariq
    Li, Zhaojun
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 32534 - 32547
  • [38] Performance of LoRa for Bike-Sharing Systems
    Croce, Daniele
    Garlisi, Domenico
    Giuliano, Fabrizio
    Lo Valvo, Alice
    Mangione, Stefano
    Tinnirello, Ilenia
    [J]. 2019 AEIT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES FOR AUTOMOTIVE (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE), 2019,
  • [39] Incentivizing Users for Balancing Bike Sharing Systems
    Singla, Adish
    Santoni, Marco
    Bartok, Gabor
    Mukerji, Pratik
    Meenen, Moritz
    Krause, Andreas
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-NINTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2015, : 723 - 729
  • [40] Improvements to Worker Assignment in Bike Sharing Systems
    Johnson, Trent
    Wu, Jie
    [J]. 2021 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE AD HOC AND SMART SYSTEMS (MASS 2021), 2021, : 639 - 644