COMPARING THE SPATIOTEMPORAL TRAVEL PATTERNS AND INFLUENCING FACTORS OF BIKE SHARING AND E- BIKE SHARING SYSTEMS

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Shishuo [1 ,2 ]
Du, Mingyi [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Haizhi [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Sikai [2 ,3 ]
Li, Fangning [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Sch Geomat & Urban Spatial Informat, 15 Yongyuan Rd, Beijing 102616, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources Peoples Republ China, Key Lab Urban Spatial Informat, 15 Yongyuan Rd, Beijing 102616, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Urban Construct Explorat & Surveying Desi, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
关键词
Micromobility; bike sharing; e-bike sharing; spatiotemporal travel patterns; spatiotemporal correlation analysis; MGWR;
D O I
10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-339-2023
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
The emergence of micromobility, exemplified by bike sharing and e-bike sharing systems, has ushered in a low-carbon, environmentally friendly, and sustainable revolution in urban transportation. This transformative shift addresses the " first and last mile" challenge and holds immense potential for urban mobility enhancement. Nevertheless, the existing literature predominantly investigates the spatiotemporal travel patterns and influencing factors of bike sharing and e-bike sharing systems in isolation, overlooking comparative analyses grounded in quantitative methodologies. In order to fill this gap, this study first compares and analysis their spatiotemporal travel patterns, which are measured by travel distance, travel time, and travel volume. A Multiscale Geoweighted Regression (MGWR) model was constructed using various data sources, such as Point of Interest (POI) data, metro station data, and bus stop data, to conduct a spatiotemporal correlation analysis of land use and public transport factors with the travel volume of the shared system. Our study centers on Manhattan, New York City, utilizing data from May 2022 for both bike sharing and e-bike sharing systems. The study analysis reveals that hourly trip volumes are higher for bike sharing than for e-bike sharing, exhibiting substantial spatial variation across different regions within the city. The MGWR model's findings suggest that educational facilities exert a negative influence on bike sharing in the northeast and on e-bike sharing trips in the central region, with this impact being more pronounced on weekends. Similarly, cultural facilities negatively affect the Central region's bike sharing system and the citywide e-bike sharing system, with a milder effect during weekends. Moreover, bus stops exhibit a significant negative impact on bike sharing and e-bike sharing at Chelsea Waterside Park (only weekdays), while displaying a positive influence on both systems during weekends. To validate the MGWR model's efficacy, we conducted a comparative analysis with a Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) model. The results demonstrate that MGWR can be more effective in correlating and quantitatively explaining the effects of different factors on spatiotemporal travel patterns. In conclusion, this study furnishes valuable insights for optimizing urban infrastructure rebalancing strategies and advancing sustainable urban infrastructure development.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 345
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implementing bike-sharing systems
    dell'Olio, Luigi
    Ibeas, Angel
    Luis Moura, Jose
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-MUNICIPAL ENGINEER, 2011, 164 (02) : 89 - 101
  • [22] Inventory Routing for Bike Sharing Systems
    Brinkmann, Jan
    Ulmer, Marlin W.
    Mattfeld, Dirk C.
    [J]. TRANSFORMING URBAN MOBILITY (TUM 2016), 2016, 19 : 316 - 327
  • [23] Impact of e-scooter sharing on bike sharing in Chicago
    Yang, Hongtai
    Huo, Jinghai
    Bao, Yongxing
    Li, Xuan
    Yang, Linchuan
    Cherry, Christopher R.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2021, 154 : 23 - 36
  • [24] Comparing the Travel Behavior of Older Users Between Station-Based and Dockless Bike Sharing Systems
    Hua, Mingzhuang
    Chen, Xuewu
    Cheng, Long
    Chen, Jingxu
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2023, 2677 (11) : 111 - 123
  • [25] Bike Fleet Allocation Models for Repositioning in Bike-Sharing Systems
    Chen, Qun
    Liu, Mei
    Liu, Xinyu
    [J]. IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2018, 10 (01) : 19 - 29
  • [26] Repositioning Bikes with Carrier Vehicles and Bike Trailers in Bike Sharing Systems
    Zheng, Xinghua
    Tang, Ming
    Liu, Yuechang
    Xian, Zhengzheng
    Zhuo, Hankz Hankui
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (16):
  • [27] Bike3S: A tool for bike sharing systems simulation
    Fernandez, Alberto
    Billhardt, Holger
    Ossowski, Sascha
    Sanchez, Oscar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SIMULATION, 2020, 14 (04) : 278 - 294
  • [28] A model for the layout of bike stations in public bike-sharing systems
    Chen, Qun
    Sun, Tingyuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2015, 49 (08) : 884 - 900
  • [29] Incentivizing the Use of Bike Trailers for Dynamic Repositioning in Bike Sharing Systems
    Ghosh, Supriyo
    Varakantham, Pradeep
    [J]. TWENTY-SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATED PLANNING AND SCHEDULING, 2017, : 373 - 381
  • [30] Understanding bike trip patterns leveraging bike sharing system open data
    Longbiao Chen
    Xiaojuan Ma
    Thi-Mai-Trang Nguyen
    Gang Pan
    Jérémie Jakubowicz
    [J]. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2017, 11 : 38 - 48