COMPARING THE SPATIOTEMPORAL TRAVEL PATTERNS AND INFLUENCING FACTORS OF BIKE SHARING AND E- BIKE SHARING SYSTEMS

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Shishuo [1 ,2 ]
Du, Mingyi [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Haizhi [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Sikai [2 ,3 ]
Li, Fangning [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Sch Geomat & Urban Spatial Informat, 15 Yongyuan Rd, Beijing 102616, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources Peoples Republ China, Key Lab Urban Spatial Informat, 15 Yongyuan Rd, Beijing 102616, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Urban Construct Explorat & Surveying Desi, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
关键词
Micromobility; bike sharing; e-bike sharing; spatiotemporal travel patterns; spatiotemporal correlation analysis; MGWR;
D O I
10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-339-2023
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
The emergence of micromobility, exemplified by bike sharing and e-bike sharing systems, has ushered in a low-carbon, environmentally friendly, and sustainable revolution in urban transportation. This transformative shift addresses the " first and last mile" challenge and holds immense potential for urban mobility enhancement. Nevertheless, the existing literature predominantly investigates the spatiotemporal travel patterns and influencing factors of bike sharing and e-bike sharing systems in isolation, overlooking comparative analyses grounded in quantitative methodologies. In order to fill this gap, this study first compares and analysis their spatiotemporal travel patterns, which are measured by travel distance, travel time, and travel volume. A Multiscale Geoweighted Regression (MGWR) model was constructed using various data sources, such as Point of Interest (POI) data, metro station data, and bus stop data, to conduct a spatiotemporal correlation analysis of land use and public transport factors with the travel volume of the shared system. Our study centers on Manhattan, New York City, utilizing data from May 2022 for both bike sharing and e-bike sharing systems. The study analysis reveals that hourly trip volumes are higher for bike sharing than for e-bike sharing, exhibiting substantial spatial variation across different regions within the city. The MGWR model's findings suggest that educational facilities exert a negative influence on bike sharing in the northeast and on e-bike sharing trips in the central region, with this impact being more pronounced on weekends. Similarly, cultural facilities negatively affect the Central region's bike sharing system and the citywide e-bike sharing system, with a milder effect during weekends. Moreover, bus stops exhibit a significant negative impact on bike sharing and e-bike sharing at Chelsea Waterside Park (only weekdays), while displaying a positive influence on both systems during weekends. To validate the MGWR model's efficacy, we conducted a comparative analysis with a Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) model. The results demonstrate that MGWR can be more effective in correlating and quantitatively explaining the effects of different factors on spatiotemporal travel patterns. In conclusion, this study furnishes valuable insights for optimizing urban infrastructure rebalancing strategies and advancing sustainable urban infrastructure development.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 345
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Insertion and patterns of travel of bike-sharing systems in three cities
    Callil, Victor
    Costanzo, Daniela
    [J]. REVISTA DE TRANSPORTE Y TERRITORIO, 2018, (19): : 7 - 16
  • [2] Mean field analysis for bike and e-bike sharing systems
    Ancel J.
    Fricker C.
    Mohamed H.
    [J]. Performance Evaluation Review, 2021, 49 (02): : 12 - 14
  • [3] Multi-scale spatiotemporal influencing factors of bike-sharing parking demand
    Xu B.
    Lu Q.-C.
    [J]. Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Gongxue Ban)/Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2023, 57 (02): : 380 - 391
  • [4] A review on bike-sharing: The factors affecting bike-sharing demand
    Eren, Ezgi
    Uz, Volkan Emre
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 54
  • [5] Analyzing Bike Repositioning Strategies based on Simulations for Public Bike Sharing Systems Simulating Bike Repositioning Strategies for Bike Sharing Systems
    Wang, I-Lin
    Wang, Chun-Wei
    [J]. 2013 SECOND IIAI INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED APPLIED INFORMATICS (IIAI-AAI 2013), 2013, : 306 - 311
  • [6] Success in tandem? The impact of the introduction of e-bike sharing on bike sharing usage
    Li, Qiumeng
    Luca, Davide
    Fuerst, Franz
    Wei, Zhiwu
    [J]. RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS, 2024, 107
  • [7] Revealing Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Influencing Factors of Dockless Bike Sharing Demand
    Lin, Pengfei
    Weng, Jiancheng
    Hu, Song
    Alivanistos, Dimitrios
    Li, Xin
    Yin, Baocai
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 66139 - 66149
  • [8] Exploring travel patterns and trip purposes of dockless bike-sharing by analyzing massive bike-sharing data in Shanghai, China
    Xing, Yingying
    Wang, Ke
    Lu, Jian John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 87
  • [9] Social Factors Influencing the Choice of Bicycle: Difference Analysis among Private Bike, Public Bike Sharing and Free-Floating Bike Sharing in Kunming, China
    Xuefeng Li
    Yong Zhang
    Mingyang Du
    Jingzong Yang
    [J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019, 23 : 2339 - 2348
  • [10] Social Factors Influencing the Choice of Bicycle: Difference Analysis among Private Bike, Public Bike Sharing and Free-Floating Bike Sharing in Kunming, China
    Li, Xuefeng
    Zhang, Yong
    Du, Mingyang
    Yang, Jingzong
    [J]. KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 23 (05) : 2339 - 2348