Apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Baba, Akira [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Kurokawa, Ryo [1 ,3 ]
Kurokawa, Mariko [1 ,3 ]
Rivera-de Choudens, Roberto [1 ]
Srinivasan, Ashok [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Div Neuroradiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Jikei Univ Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Minato Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Univ Tokyo Hosp, Dept Radiol, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Jikei Univ Sch Med, Dept Radiol, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi,Minato Ku, Tokyo 1058461, Japan
关键词
Head and neck; squamous cell carcinoma; lymphoma; systematic review; meta-analysis; apparent diffusion coefficient; WEIGHTED MRI; ADC; LESIONS; BENIGN; CANCER; CHEMORADIATION; QUALITY; VALUES; TUMORS; ECHO;
D O I
10.1177/02841851241228487
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Radiological differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck is often difficult due to their similarities. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic benefit of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculated from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating the two. Material and Methods A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Forest plots and the pooled mean difference of ADC values were calculated to describe the relationship between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistic. Results The review identified eight studies with 440 patients (441 lesions) eligible for meta-analysis. Among all studies, the mean ADC values of squamous cell carcinoma was 0.88 x 10(-3)mm(2)/s and that of lymphoma was 0.64 x 10(-3)mm(2)/s. In the meta-analysis, the ADC value of lymphoma was significantly lower than that of squamous cell carcinoma (pooled mean difference = 0.235, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.168-0.302, P <0.0001). The Cochrane Q test (chi-square = 55.7, P <0.0001) and I-2 statistic (I2 = 87.4%, 95% CI = 77.4-93.0%) revealed significant heterogeneity. Conclusion This study highlights the value of quantitative assessment of ADC for objective and reliable differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Conclusions should be interpreted with caution due to heterogeneity in the study data.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 454
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Recurrent/Persistent Head and Neck Squamous-Cell Carcinoma After Radiotherapy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Canali, Luca
    Costantino, Andrea
    Mari, Giulia
    Festa, Bianca Maria
    Russo, Elena
    Giannitto, Caterina
    Spriano, Giuseppe
    De Virgilio, Armando
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2025, 172 (01) : 13 - 24
  • [42] Preoperative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values for Differentiation between Low and High Grade Meningiomas: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tsai, Yueh-Ting
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    Shih, Yun-Ju
    Lim, Sher-Wei
    Yang, Cheng-Chun
    Kuo, Yu-Ting
    Chen, Jeon-Hor
    Ko, Ching-Chung
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (03)
  • [43] Prognostic value of the nodal yield in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Jiajia
    Xu, Yubo
    Zhang, Jie
    Wang, Shaohai
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Guo, Huayan
    Miao, Guojun
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2023, 23 (03) : 339 - 345
  • [44] Usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient values for distinguishing between squamous cell carcinoma and malignant salivary gland tumor of the head and neck
    Panyaping, Theeraphol
    Tepkidakarn, Nawanwat
    Kiatthanabumrung, Sivaporn
    Wattanatranon, Duangkamon
    Tritanon, Oranan
    NEURORADIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 36 (05): : 548 - 554
  • [45] Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Nodal Staging in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis
    Wu, Lian-Ming
    Xu, Jian-Rong
    Liu, Man-Ju
    Zhang, Xiao-Fei
    Hua, Jia
    Zheng, Jasmine
    Hu, Jia-Ni
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2012, 19 (03) : 331 - 340
  • [46] TERT promoter mutations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis on prevalence and prognostic significance
    Boscolo-Rizzo, Paolo
    Tirelli, Giancarlo
    Polesel, Jerry
    Sia, Egidio
    Phillips, Veronica
    Borsetto, Daniele
    De Rossi, Anita
    Giunco, Silvia
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 140
  • [47] The effect of circulating tumor DNA on the prognosis of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Ruoyi
    Li, Teng
    Zhang, Sicheng
    Shui, Chunyan
    Ma, Hong
    Li, Chao
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [48] Prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhendan Wang
    Kai Cui
    Yan Xue
    Feng Tong
    Sheng Li
    Medical Oncology, 2015, 32
  • [49] Prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Zhendan
    Cui, Kai
    Xue, Yan
    Tong, Feng
    Li, Sheng
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 32 (05)
  • [50] Temporal changes in the efficacy of chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Winquist, Eric
    Al-Rasheedy, Intisar
    Nichols, Anthony C.
    Palma, David A.
    Stitt, Larry
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2014, 40 (09) : 1073 - 1079