Apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Baba, Akira [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Kurokawa, Ryo [1 ,3 ]
Kurokawa, Mariko [1 ,3 ]
Rivera-de Choudens, Roberto [1 ]
Srinivasan, Ashok [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Div Neuroradiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Jikei Univ Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Minato Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Univ Tokyo Hosp, Dept Radiol, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Jikei Univ Sch Med, Dept Radiol, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi,Minato Ku, Tokyo 1058461, Japan
关键词
Head and neck; squamous cell carcinoma; lymphoma; systematic review; meta-analysis; apparent diffusion coefficient; WEIGHTED MRI; ADC; LESIONS; BENIGN; CANCER; CHEMORADIATION; QUALITY; VALUES; TUMORS; ECHO;
D O I
10.1177/02841851241228487
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Radiological differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck is often difficult due to their similarities. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic benefit of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculated from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating the two. Material and Methods A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Forest plots and the pooled mean difference of ADC values were calculated to describe the relationship between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistic. Results The review identified eight studies with 440 patients (441 lesions) eligible for meta-analysis. Among all studies, the mean ADC values of squamous cell carcinoma was 0.88 x 10(-3)mm(2)/s and that of lymphoma was 0.64 x 10(-3)mm(2)/s. In the meta-analysis, the ADC value of lymphoma was significantly lower than that of squamous cell carcinoma (pooled mean difference = 0.235, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.168-0.302, P <0.0001). The Cochrane Q test (chi-square = 55.7, P <0.0001) and I-2 statistic (I2 = 87.4%, 95% CI = 77.4-93.0%) revealed significant heterogeneity. Conclusion This study highlights the value of quantitative assessment of ADC for objective and reliable differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Conclusions should be interpreted with caution due to heterogeneity in the study data.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 454
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prognostic and Clinicopathological Significance of FADD Upregulation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Angel Gonzalez-Moles, Miguel
    Ayen, Angela
    Gonzalez-Ruiz, Isabel
    De Porras-Carrique, Teresa
    Gonzalez-Ruiz, Lucia
    Ruiz-Avila, Isabel
    Ramos-Garcia, Pablo
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (09) : 1 - 23
  • [32] Systemic Therapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lau, Ashley
    Yang, Wei-fa
    Li, Kar-Yan
    Su, Yu-xiong
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2020, 153
  • [33] Identifying risk factors for the prognosis of head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zeng, Shihua
    Fu, Lixin
    Zhou, Peimei
    Ling, Hua
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (09):
  • [34] The Prognostic Role of Perineural Invasion for Survival in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tao, Zhuo-Ying
    Chu, Guang
    Su, Yu-Xiong
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (14)
  • [35] The prognostic role of tumor associated macrophages in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bisheshar, Sangeeta K.
    van der Kamp, Martine F.
    de Ruiter, Emma J.
    Ruiter, Lilian N.
    van der Vegt, Bert
    Breimer, Gerben E.
    Willems, Stefan M.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 135
  • [36] MicroRNAs as prognostic molecular signatures in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jamali, Zahra
    Aminabadi, Naser Asl
    Attaran, Rana
    Pournagiazar, Fatemeh
    Oskouei, Sina Ghertasi
    Ahmadpour, Farzin
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 51 (04) : 321 - 331
  • [37] Utility of modified Glasgow prognostic score for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luan, Chih-Wei
    Kuo, Liang-Tseng
    Wang, Yun-Ting
    Liao, Chun-Ta
    Kang, Chung-Jan
    Lee, Yi-Chan
    Chen, Kuan-Yin
    Lai, Chia-Hsuan
    Tsai, Yuan-Hsiung
    Huang, Ethan I.
    Tsai, Ming-Shao
    Hsu, Cheng-Ming
    Chang, Geng-He
    Tsai, Yao-Te
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2023, 45 (07): : 1856 - 1867
  • [38] Regional Metastasis in Head and Neck Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Update on the Significance of Extra-Nodal Extension and Soft Tissue Metastasis
    Hasmat, Shaheen
    Mooney, Craig
    Gao, Kan
    Palme, Carsten E.
    Ebrahimi, Ardalan
    Ch'ng, Sydney
    Gupta, Ruta
    Low, Tsu-Hui
    Clark, Jonathan
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (08) : 2840 - 2845
  • [39] Apparent diffusion coefficient for discriminating metastatic lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
    Pekcevik, Yeliz
    Cukurova, Ibrahim
    Arslan, Ilker Burak
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 21 (05) : 397 - 402
  • [40] Squamous cell carcinoma antigen as a prognostic marker andits correlation with clinicopathological features in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Travassos, Daphine Caxias
    Fernandes, Darcy
    Sgavioli Massucato, Elaine Maria
    Navarro, Claudia Maria
    Bufalino, Andreia
    JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2018, 47 (01) : 3 - 10