Apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Baba, Akira [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Kurokawa, Ryo [1 ,3 ]
Kurokawa, Mariko [1 ,3 ]
Rivera-de Choudens, Roberto [1 ]
Srinivasan, Ashok [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Div Neuroradiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Jikei Univ Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Minato Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Univ Tokyo Hosp, Dept Radiol, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Jikei Univ Sch Med, Dept Radiol, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi,Minato Ku, Tokyo 1058461, Japan
关键词
Head and neck; squamous cell carcinoma; lymphoma; systematic review; meta-analysis; apparent diffusion coefficient; WEIGHTED MRI; ADC; LESIONS; BENIGN; CANCER; CHEMORADIATION; QUALITY; VALUES; TUMORS; ECHO;
D O I
10.1177/02841851241228487
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Radiological differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck is often difficult due to their similarities. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic benefit of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculated from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating the two. Material and Methods A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Forest plots and the pooled mean difference of ADC values were calculated to describe the relationship between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistic. Results The review identified eight studies with 440 patients (441 lesions) eligible for meta-analysis. Among all studies, the mean ADC values of squamous cell carcinoma was 0.88 x 10(-3)mm(2)/s and that of lymphoma was 0.64 x 10(-3)mm(2)/s. In the meta-analysis, the ADC value of lymphoma was significantly lower than that of squamous cell carcinoma (pooled mean difference = 0.235, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.168-0.302, P <0.0001). The Cochrane Q test (chi-square = 55.7, P <0.0001) and I-2 statistic (I2 = 87.4%, 95% CI = 77.4-93.0%) revealed significant heterogeneity. Conclusion This study highlights the value of quantitative assessment of ADC for objective and reliable differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Conclusions should be interpreted with caution due to heterogeneity in the study data.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 454
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, Xiayi
    Qiu, Jie
    Zhang, Ya
    Lin, Chunni
    Wang, Xiaohui
    Shi, Xiwei
    Yang, Siya
    Wu, Qiaoyan
    Cong, Li
    PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 212
  • [22] Combination immunochemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xu, Qiudong
    Huang, Shuang
    Yang, Kai
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [23] Systematic review and meta-analysis of pediatric head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (PHNSCC): An analysis of 217 cases
    Venkatesulu, B. P.
    Mallick, S.
    Thoyattan, A. G. F.
    Rath, G. K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27
  • [24] Apparent diffusion coefficient is a prognostic factor of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy
    Hatakenaka, Masamitsu
    Nakamura, Katsumasa
    Yabuuchi, Hidetake
    Shioyama, Yoshiyuki
    Matsuo, Yoshio
    Kamitani, Takeshi
    Yonezawa, Masato
    Yoshiura, Takashi
    Nakashima, Torahiko
    Mori, Mitsuru
    Honda, Hiroshi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 32 (02) : 80 - 89
  • [25] Apparent diffusion coefficient is a prognostic factor of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy
    Masamitsu Hatakenaka
    Katsumasa Nakamura
    Hidetake Yabuuchi
    Yoshiyuki Shioyama
    Yoshio Matsuo
    Takeshi Kamitani
    Masato Yonezawa
    Takashi Yoshiura
    Torahiko Nakashima
    Mitsuru Mori
    Hiroshi Honda
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2014, 32 : 80 - 89
  • [26] Utility of Pretreatment Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histograms in Prediction of Outcome to Chemoradiation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Srinivasan, Ashok
    Chenevert, Thomas L.
    Dwamena, Ben A.
    Eisbruch, Avraham
    Watcharotone, Kuanwong
    Myles, James D.
    Mukherji, Suresh K.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2012, 36 (01) : 131 - 137
  • [27] Prognostic value of the nodal yield in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review
    de Kort, Willem W. B.
    Maas, Sybren L. N.
    Van Es, Robert J. J.
    Willems, Stefan M.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2019, 41 (08): : 2801 - 2810
  • [28] Regional Metastasis in Head and Neck Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Update on the Significance of Extra-Nodal Extension and Soft Tissue Metastasis
    Shaheen Hasmat
    Craig Mooney
    Kan Gao
    Carsten E. Palme
    Ardalan Ebrahimi
    Sydney Ch’ng
    Ruta Gupta
    Tsu-Hui Low
    Jonathan Clark
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 2840 - 2845
  • [29] Prognostic significance of soft tissue deposits in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kaul, P.
    Malhotra, M.
    Arora, V.
    Agarwal, N.
    Singh, M. P.
    Garg, P. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 52 (09) : 917 - 922
  • [30] The prognostic role of NK cells and their ligands in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bisheshar, Sangeeta K.
    De Ruiter, Emma J.
    Devriese, Lot A.
    Willems, Stefan M.
    ONCOIMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 9 (01):