Working with the tensions of transdisciplinary research: a review and agenda for the future of knowledge co-production in the Anthropocene

被引:2
|
作者
Harris, Frances [1 ]
Lyon, Fergus [2 ]
Sioen, Giles B. [3 ,4 ]
Ebi, Krsitie L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hertfordshire, Geog Environm & Planning & Sch Educ, Hatfield, England
[2] Middlesex Univ, Ctr Enterprise Environm & Dev Res, London, England
[3] Future Earth Global Secretariat, Tsukuba, Japan
[4] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Earth Syst Div, Tsukuba, Japan
[5] Univ Washington, Ctr Hlth & Global Environm CHanGE, Seattle, WA USA
来源
GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY | 2024年 / 7卷
关键词
collaboration; institutional logics; sustainability science; transdisciplinarity; SUSTAINABILITY RESEARCH; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; NATURAL-RESOURCE; COMPLEX-SYSTEMS; SCIENCE; CHALLENGES; INNOVATION; FRAMEWORK; POLICY; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.1017/sus.2024.11
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Non-technical summary Transdisciplinary approaches for sustainability brings natural and social science researchers together with non researchers to fill gaps in scientific knowledge and catalyze change. By connecting diverse academic fields and sectors, it addresses complex problems and enables learning for problem solving. However, institutional barriers, funding constraints, time limitations, and evaluation criteria hinder collaborative progress. Our review reveals tensions at institutional and individual levels. Our findings underscore the significance of soft skills in assembling effective transdisciplinary teams. Embracing transdisciplinary science, as suggested by our review, can enhance problem-solving, and foster transformations for sustainability and resilience.Technical summary Sustainability challenges in the age of the Anthropocene require researchers and practitioners to collaborate across multiple academic disciplines and multiple professions outside of universities. In this paper we draw on theories of institutional logics to explore how those involved in transdisciplinary environmental research and practice draw on particular sets of values and norms but encounter challenges to collaboration. These institutional logics include (among others) seeking societal/environmental impact, commercial objectives, and academic knowledge generation. In this paper we review the growing literature on the research experience of transdisciplinarity in sustainability; discuss the processes of managing such research; and present a framework that outlines the challenges and tensions at each stage of the innovation/research process. We set out an agenda for managing tension that calls for recognizing the challenges, learning how to work with tensions, and building capabilities for future careers involving transdisciplinary research. The paper shows a key competence or skill for transdisciplinarians is the ability to develop complex collaborative relationships for sustainability drawing together different institutional logics, approaches, methods, goals, and values.Social media summary Transdisciplinary science: bridging disciplines, solving challenges. Soft skills and collaboration key to success.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Co-Production: A Social Practice Approach
    Slater, Kimberley
    Robinson, John
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (18)
  • [32] Urban research for sustainability: developing a comparative transdisciplinary co-production approach to realise just cities
    Palmer, Henrietta
    Simon, David
    Riise, Jan
    [J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2022, 25 (1-2) : 78 - 94
  • [33] Maternity Management in SMEs: A Transdisciplinary Review and Research Agenda
    Stumbitz, Bianca
    Lewis, Suzan
    Rouse, Julia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2018, 20 (02) : 500 - 522
  • [34] Flexible global working arrangements: An integrative review and future research agenda
    Jooss, Stefan
    McDonnell, Anthony
    Conroy, Kieran
    [J]. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2021, 31 (04)
  • [35] Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study
    Janet Heaton
    Jo Day
    Nicky Britten
    [J]. Implementation Science, 11
  • [36] CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES FOR KNOWLEDGE CO-PRODUCTION IN ECOSYSTEM AND NATURAL HAZARDS RESEARCH
    Kolesar, Sarah E.
    Ruggiero, Peter
    Tullos, Desiree
    Tilt, Jenna H.
    Tilt, Bryan
    Thompson, Brook M.
    [J]. OCEANOGRAPHY, 2024, 37 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [37] Negotiating space for knowledge co-production
    Verwoerd, Lisa
    Brouwers, Hilde
    Kunseler, Eva
    Regeer, Barbara
    de Hoop, Evelien
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2023, 50 (01) : 59 - 71
  • [38] Creating relevant knowledge in transdisciplinary research projects - Coping with inherent tensions
    Schikowitz, Andrea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2020, 7 (02) : 217 - 237
  • [39] Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study
    Heaton, Janet
    Day, Jo
    Britten, Nicky
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2016, 11
  • [40] The co-production of knowledge for climate science
    Miner, Kimberley
    Canavera, Leslie
    Gonet, Jared
    Luis, Kelly
    Maddox, Marisol
    McCarney, Paul
    Bridge, Gwen
    Schimel, David
    Rattlingleaf, James
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2023, 13 (04) : 307 - 308