Working with the tensions of transdisciplinary research: a review and agenda for the future of knowledge co-production in the Anthropocene

被引:2
|
作者
Harris, Frances [1 ]
Lyon, Fergus [2 ]
Sioen, Giles B. [3 ,4 ]
Ebi, Krsitie L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hertfordshire, Geog Environm & Planning & Sch Educ, Hatfield, England
[2] Middlesex Univ, Ctr Enterprise Environm & Dev Res, London, England
[3] Future Earth Global Secretariat, Tsukuba, Japan
[4] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Earth Syst Div, Tsukuba, Japan
[5] Univ Washington, Ctr Hlth & Global Environm CHanGE, Seattle, WA USA
来源
GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY | 2024年 / 7卷
关键词
collaboration; institutional logics; sustainability science; transdisciplinarity; SUSTAINABILITY RESEARCH; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; NATURAL-RESOURCE; COMPLEX-SYSTEMS; SCIENCE; CHALLENGES; INNOVATION; FRAMEWORK; POLICY; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.1017/sus.2024.11
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Non-technical summary Transdisciplinary approaches for sustainability brings natural and social science researchers together with non researchers to fill gaps in scientific knowledge and catalyze change. By connecting diverse academic fields and sectors, it addresses complex problems and enables learning for problem solving. However, institutional barriers, funding constraints, time limitations, and evaluation criteria hinder collaborative progress. Our review reveals tensions at institutional and individual levels. Our findings underscore the significance of soft skills in assembling effective transdisciplinary teams. Embracing transdisciplinary science, as suggested by our review, can enhance problem-solving, and foster transformations for sustainability and resilience.Technical summary Sustainability challenges in the age of the Anthropocene require researchers and practitioners to collaborate across multiple academic disciplines and multiple professions outside of universities. In this paper we draw on theories of institutional logics to explore how those involved in transdisciplinary environmental research and practice draw on particular sets of values and norms but encounter challenges to collaboration. These institutional logics include (among others) seeking societal/environmental impact, commercial objectives, and academic knowledge generation. In this paper we review the growing literature on the research experience of transdisciplinarity in sustainability; discuss the processes of managing such research; and present a framework that outlines the challenges and tensions at each stage of the innovation/research process. We set out an agenda for managing tension that calls for recognizing the challenges, learning how to work with tensions, and building capabilities for future careers involving transdisciplinary research. The paper shows a key competence or skill for transdisciplinarians is the ability to develop complex collaborative relationships for sustainability drawing together different institutional logics, approaches, methods, goals, and values.Social media summary Transdisciplinary science: bridging disciplines, solving challenges. Soft skills and collaboration key to success.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ethics and the co-production of knowledge
    Page, Katie
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2022, 32 (02):
  • [22] Co-production of knowledge in the integrality
    Montes, Cecilia
    [J]. PSICOLOGIA CONOCIMIENTO Y SOCIEDAD, 2015, 5 (02): : 414 - 429
  • [23] Co-production of knowledge in transdisciplinary communities of practice: Experiences from food governance in South Africa
    Adelle, Camilla
    Gorgens, Tristan
    Kroll, Florian
    Losch, Bruno
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 48 (02) : 145 - 153
  • [24] Building trust, building futures: Knowledge co-production as relationship, design, and process in transdisciplinary science
    Kliskey, Andrew Anaru
    Williams, Paula
    Trammell, E. Jamie
    Cronan, Daniel
    Griffith, David
    Alessa, Lilian
    Lammers, Richard
    Haro-Marti, Mario E. de
    Oxarango-Ingram, Julia
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [25] Research methodologies for the co-production of knowledge for environmental management in Australia
    Maclean, Kirsten
    Cullen, Leanne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND, 2009, 39 (04) : 205 - 208
  • [26] Co-Production of Research Methods Knowledge in Criminology and Criminal Justice
    Pyo, Jimin
    Maxfield, Michael G. G.
    Marteache, Nerea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE EDUCATION, 2023,
  • [27] Participatory Organizational Research: Examining Voice in the Co-production of Knowledge
    Burns, Diane
    Hyde, Paula
    Killett, Anne
    Poland, Fiona
    Gray, Richard
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 25 (01) : 133 - 144
  • [28] A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation
    John Fellenor
    Nicky Britten
    Molly Courtenay
    Rupert A. Payne
    Jose Valderas
    Rachel Denholm
    Polly Duncan
    Deborah McCahon
    Lynn Tatnell
    Richard Fitzgerald
    Krystal Warmoth
    David Gillespie
    Katrina Turner
    Margaret Watson
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 21
  • [29] A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation
    Fellenor, John
    Britten, Nicky
    Courtenay, Molly
    Payne, Rupert A.
    Valderas, Jose
    Denholm, Rachel
    Duncan, Polly
    McCahon, Deborah
    Tatnell, Lynn
    Fitzgerald, Richard
    Warmoth, Krystal
    Gillespie, David
    Turner, Katrina
    Watson, Margaret
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [30] Co-production: The future of mental health nursing research in Australia
    Hamilton, B.
    Roper, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2012, 21 : 9 - 9