VALIDATION OF THE KESSLER'S PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS SCALE (K10 & K6) IN A MALAYSIAN POPULATION

被引:0
|
作者
Tiong, Xun Ting [1 ]
Abdullah, Nur Sara Shahira [1 ]
Bujang, Mohamad Adam [1 ]
Sapri, Fatin Ellisya Binti [1 ]
Ratnasingam, Selvasingam [5 ]
Joon, Chong Kok [6 ]
Wee, Hwee Lin [7 ]
Venkataraman, Kavita [8 ]
Tai, E. Shyong [8 ]
Fong, Alan Yean Yip [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sarawak Gen Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Jalan Hosp, Kuching 93586, Sarawak, Malaysia
[2] Sarawak Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Kota Samarahan 94300, Malaysia
[3] Swinburne Univ Technol, Sarawak 93300, Malaysia
[4] Univ Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan 94300, Malaysia
[5] Sarawak Gen Hosp, Dept Psychiat & Mental Hlth, Kuching 93586, Malaysia
[6] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Med, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore 119077, Singapore
[7] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[8] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Pharm, Fac Sci, Singapore 119077, Singapore
来源
ASEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY | 2018年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
Kessler's Physiology Distress Scale; K10; K6; Malay Version;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: A quick assessment tool for screening individuals with depression or anxiety is pertinent in mental-health set up. This study aims to validate the K10 and the K6 to screen patients with non-specific psychological distress in a Malaysian population. Methods: Translation of the questionnaire was done from English to Malay. Face validity was conducted on patients, and a pilot study was performed to assess the reliability of the K10 questionnaire. Fieldwork was conducted to determine the reliability and validity of the K10 questionnaire based on convenience sampling of healthy individuals and patients diagnosed with psychiatric illness. Malay version for K10 was administered to healthy participants (group without psychological distress) and patients on psychiatric clinic follow up (psychological distress). Data collection was done between August 2016 and September 2016. Result: A total of 94 subjects were recruited in the study, of which 32 formed the case group. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for K10 were 0.837(control) and 0.885 (case), as for K6 were 0.716 (control) and 0.859 (case). The total score of the K10 and the K6 clearly differentiated between the control and case groups (p<0.001). The area under the curve for K10 and K6 were 0.84 with 95% CI (0.81, 0.96) and 0.86 with 95% CI (0.77, 0.94) respectively. For K10, at the optimal cut-off score of 17, the sensitivity and specificity were 84.4% and 75.3% respectively while for K6, at the optimal cut-off score of 11, the sensitivity and specificity were 78.1% and 75.8%, respectively. Conclusion: The Malay version of the K10 and the K6 are reliable and valid to be used for screening patients with non-specific psychological distress in a Malaysian population. Kessler psychological distress scale has minimal items and yet this Kessler psychological distress scales have minimal items and yet are an effective screening tool.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 85
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Utility of the Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6) in Two American Indian Communities
    Mitchell, Christina M.
    Beals, Janette
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2011, 23 (03) : 752 - 761
  • [22] The Psychometric Properties of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) in an Epidemiological Sample of Canadian Youth
    Ferro, Mark A.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2019, 64 (09): : 647 - 657
  • [23] Danish translation and validation of Kessler's 10-item psychological distress scale-K10
    Thelin, Camilla
    Mikkelsen, Benjamin
    Laier, Gunnar
    Turgut, Louise
    Henriksen, Bente
    Olsen, Lis Raabaek
    Larsen, Jens Knud
    Arnfred, Sidse
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 71 (06) : 411 - 416
  • [24] The psychometric properties of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in Canadian military personnel
    Sampasa-Kanyinga, Hugues
    Zamorski, Mark A.
    Colman, Ian
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (04):
  • [25] How Much Distress Is Too Much on Deployed Operations? Validation of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) for Application in Military Operational Settings
    Blanc, Sebastien
    Zamorski, Mark
    Ivey, Gary
    Edge, Heather McCuaig
    Hill, Kate
    MILITARY PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 26 (02) : 88 - 100
  • [26] Reliability and Factor Structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults
    Pereira, Anabela
    Oliveira, Carla Andreia
    Bartolo, Ana
    Monteiro, Sara
    Vagos, Paula
    Jardim, Jacinto
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2019, 24 (03): : 729 - 736
  • [27] Bruikbaarheid van Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) voor prevalentieschatting van depressie en angststoornissen
    Hans Spee
    Niels Smits
    Harry de Koning
    Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen, 2012, 90 (3) : 145 - 149
  • [28] Higher stress scores for female medical students measured by the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in Pakistan
    Qamar, Khadija
    Kiani, Muhammad Rizwan Bashir
    Ayyub, Aisha
    Khan, Atif Ahmed
    Osama, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2014, 11
  • [29] Prevalence of Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Kessler 6 (K6), and Related Factors in Japanese Employees
    Fushimi, Masahito
    Saito, Seiji
    Shimizu, Tetsuo
    Kudo, Yasutsugu
    Seki, Masayuki
    Murata, Katsuyuki
    COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2012, 48 (03) : 328 - 335
  • [30] Prevalence of Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Kessler 6 (K6), and Related Factors in Japanese Employees
    Masahito Fushimi
    Seiji Saito
    Tetsuo Shimizu
    Yasutsugu Kudo
    Masayuki Seki
    Katsuyuki Murata
    Community Mental Health Journal, 2012, 48 : 328 - 335