VALIDATION OF THE KESSLER'S PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS SCALE (K10 & K6) IN A MALAYSIAN POPULATION

被引:0
|
作者
Tiong, Xun Ting [1 ]
Abdullah, Nur Sara Shahira [1 ]
Bujang, Mohamad Adam [1 ]
Sapri, Fatin Ellisya Binti [1 ]
Ratnasingam, Selvasingam [5 ]
Joon, Chong Kok [6 ]
Wee, Hwee Lin [7 ]
Venkataraman, Kavita [8 ]
Tai, E. Shyong [8 ]
Fong, Alan Yean Yip [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sarawak Gen Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Jalan Hosp, Kuching 93586, Sarawak, Malaysia
[2] Sarawak Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Kota Samarahan 94300, Malaysia
[3] Swinburne Univ Technol, Sarawak 93300, Malaysia
[4] Univ Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan 94300, Malaysia
[5] Sarawak Gen Hosp, Dept Psychiat & Mental Hlth, Kuching 93586, Malaysia
[6] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Med, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore 119077, Singapore
[7] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[8] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Pharm, Fac Sci, Singapore 119077, Singapore
来源
ASEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY | 2018年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
Kessler's Physiology Distress Scale; K10; K6; Malay Version;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: A quick assessment tool for screening individuals with depression or anxiety is pertinent in mental-health set up. This study aims to validate the K10 and the K6 to screen patients with non-specific psychological distress in a Malaysian population. Methods: Translation of the questionnaire was done from English to Malay. Face validity was conducted on patients, and a pilot study was performed to assess the reliability of the K10 questionnaire. Fieldwork was conducted to determine the reliability and validity of the K10 questionnaire based on convenience sampling of healthy individuals and patients diagnosed with psychiatric illness. Malay version for K10 was administered to healthy participants (group without psychological distress) and patients on psychiatric clinic follow up (psychological distress). Data collection was done between August 2016 and September 2016. Result: A total of 94 subjects were recruited in the study, of which 32 formed the case group. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for K10 were 0.837(control) and 0.885 (case), as for K6 were 0.716 (control) and 0.859 (case). The total score of the K10 and the K6 clearly differentiated between the control and case groups (p<0.001). The area under the curve for K10 and K6 were 0.84 with 95% CI (0.81, 0.96) and 0.86 with 95% CI (0.77, 0.94) respectively. For K10, at the optimal cut-off score of 17, the sensitivity and specificity were 84.4% and 75.3% respectively while for K6, at the optimal cut-off score of 11, the sensitivity and specificity were 78.1% and 75.8%, respectively. Conclusion: The Malay version of the K10 and the K6 are reliable and valid to be used for screening patients with non-specific psychological distress in a Malaysian population. Kessler psychological distress scale has minimal items and yet this Kessler psychological distress scales have minimal items and yet are an effective screening tool.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 85
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The performance of the K6 and K10 screening scales for psychological distress in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being
    Furukawa, TA
    Kessler, RC
    Slade, T
    Andrews, G
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2003, 33 (02) : 357 - 362
  • [32] Characteristic distribution of the total and individual item scores on the Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6) in US adults
    Tomitaka, Shinichiro
    Kawasaki, Yohei
    Ide, Kazuki
    Akutagawa, Maiko
    Yamada, Hiroshi
    Ono, Yutaka
    Furukawa, Toshiaki A.
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 17
  • [33] Characteristic distribution of the total and individual item scores on the Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6) in US adults
    Shinichiro Tomitaka
    Yohei Kawasaki
    Kazuki Ide
    Maiko Akutagawa
    Hiroshi Yamada
    Yutaka Ono
    Toshiaki A. Furukawa
    BMC Psychiatry, 17
  • [34] Measurement invariance of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among children of Chinese rural-to-urban migrant workers
    Ren, Qiang
    Li, Yong
    Chen, Ding-Geng
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [35] Measuring psychological distress using the K10 in Kenya
    Ongeri, Linnet
    Ametaj, Amantia
    Kim, Hannah
    Stroud, Rocky E.
    Newton, Charles R.
    Kariuki, Symon M.
    Atwoli, Lukoye
    Kwobah, Edith
    Gelaye, Bizu
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2022, 303 : 155 - 160
  • [36] The Kessler Abbreviated Psychological Distress Scale (K6) in Canadian population surveys : Report on psychometric assessment practices and analysis of the performance of several reliability coefficients
    Marleau, J.
    Turgeon, S.
    Turgeon, J.
    REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2022, 70 (01): : 17 - 24
  • [37] Serious Psychological Distress, as Measured by the K6, and Mortality
    Pratt, Laura A.
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (03) : 202 - 209
  • [38] Psychometric properties of an interviewer-administered version of the Kessler Psychological Distress scale (K10) among Dutch, Moroccan and Turkish respondents
    Fassaert, T.
    de Wit, M. A. S.
    Tuinebreijer, W. C.
    Wouters, H.
    Verhoeff, A. P.
    Beekman, A. T. F.
    Dekker, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (03) : 159 - 168
  • [39] Psychological distress measured using the Kessler scale (K6) predicts long-term postoperative pain after wrist surgery
    Luc Nguyen
    Blasquez, Sylvie
    Bataille, Benoit
    Chassery, Clement
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2012, 59 (12): : 1150 - 1151
  • [40] Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Kessler Distress Scale (K10): an application of the rating scale model
    Peixoto, Evandro Morais
    Zanini, Daniela Sacramento
    de Andrade, Josemberg Moura
    PSICOLOGIA-REFLEXAO E CRITICA, 2021, 34 (01):