Crop yield distributions: fit, efficiency, and performance

被引:12
|
作者
Sherrick, Bruce J. [1 ,2 ]
Lanoue, Christopher A. [3 ]
Woodard, Joshua [4 ]
Schnitkey, Gary D. [1 ]
Paulson, Nicholas D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Farmland Econ, Farm Management, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, TIAA Ctr Farmland Res, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Nautilyt LLC, Boston, MA USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Dyson Sch Appl Econ & Managesment, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
关键词
Crop insurance; beta distribution; Burr XII distribution; Mixture of normals; Weibull distribution; Yield risk;
D O I
10.1108/AFR-05-2013-0021
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the empirical evidence about crop yield distributions that are often used in practical models evaluating crop yield risk and insurance. Additionally, a simulation approach is used to compare the performance of alternative specifications when the underlying form is not known, to identify implications for the choice of parameterization of yield distributions in modeling contexts. Design/methodology/approach - Using a unique high-quality farm-level corn yield data set, commonly used parametric, semi-parametric, and non-parametric distributions are examined against widely used in-sample goodness-of-fit (GOF) measures. Then, a simulation framework is used to assess the out-of-sample characteristics by using known distributions to generate samples that are assessed in an insurance valuation context under alternative specifications of the yield distribution. Findings - Bias and efficiency trade-offs are identified for both in-and out-of-sample contexts, including a simple insurance rating application. Use of GOF measures in small samples can lead to inappropriate selection of candidate distributions that perform poorly in straightforward economic applications. The beta distribution consistently overstates rates even when fitted to data generated from a b distribution, while the Weibull consistently understates rates; though small sample features slightly favor Weibull. The TCMN and kernel density estimators are least biased in-sample, but can perform very badly out-of-sample due to overfitting issues. The TCMN performs reasonably well across sample sizes and initial conditions. Practical implications - Economic applications should consider the consequence of bias vs efficiency in the selection of characterizations of yield risk. Parsimonious specifications often outperform more complex characterizations of yield distributions in small sample settings, and in cases where more demanding uses of extreme-event probabilities are required. Originality/value - The study helps provide guidance on the selection of distributions used to characterize yield risk and provides an extensive empirical demonstration of yield risk measures across a high-quality set of actual farm experiences. The out-of-sample examination provides evidence of the impact of sample size, underlying variability, and region of the probability measure used on the performance of candidate distributions.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / +
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sprinkler irrigation uniformity: Impact on the crop yield and water use efficiency
    M. H. Abd El-Wahed
    M. Medici
    G. Lorenzini
    Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2016, 25 : 117 - 125
  • [42] Implications of atmospheric and climatic change for crop yield and water use efficiency
    Polley, HW
    CROP SCIENCE, 2002, 42 (01) : 131 - 140
  • [43] Crop Yield Convergence: How Russia's Yield Performance Has Compared to Global Yield Leaders
    Michael A Trueblood
    Carlos Arnade
    Comparative Economic Studies, 2001, 43 (2) : 59 - 81
  • [44] Aerobic rice: crop performance and water use efficiency
    Grassi, C.
    Bouman, B. A. M.
    Castaneda, A. R.
    Manzelli, M.
    Vecchio, V.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 103 (04) : 259 - 270
  • [45] EFFICIENCY OF EARLY SELECTION FOR YIELD PERFORMANCE IN WHEAT
    PETERS, B
    SPANAKAKIS, A
    WEBER, WE
    PLANT BREEDING, 1991, 107 (02) : 97 - 104
  • [46] Modeling of soybean yield using symmetric, asymmetric and bimodal distributions: implications for crop insurance
    Duarte, Gislaine V.
    Braga, Altemir
    Miquelluti, Daniel L.
    Ozaki, Vitor A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2018, 45 (11) : 1920 - 1937
  • [47] Yield, water use efficiency, and yield response factor in carrot crop under different irrigation depths
    de Carvalho, Daniel Fonseca
    de Oliveira Neto, Dionizio Honorio
    Felix, Luiz Fernando
    Marinho Guerra, Jose Guilherme
    Salvador, Conan Ayade
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2016, 46 (07): : 1145 - 1150
  • [48] Yield and economic performance of crop rotation systems in South Dakota
    Feng, Hanxiao
    Wang, Tong
    Osborne, Shannon L.
    Kumar, Sandeep
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 4 (03)
  • [50] Crop Cultivation Underneath Agro-Photovoltaic Systems and Its Effects on Crop Growth, Yield, and Photosynthetic Efficiency
    Lee, Hyo Jin
    Park, Hyun Hwa
    Kim, Young Ok
    Kuk, Yong In
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (08):