STATISTICAL EFFICIENCY OF DOUBLE-BOUNDED DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE CONTINGENT VALUATION

被引:965
|
作者
HANEMANN, M
LOOMIS, J
KANNINEN, B
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF DAVIS,ENVIRONM STUDIES,DAVIS,CA 95616
[2] UNIV CALIF DAVIS,AGR ECON,DAVIS,CA 95616
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
CONTINGENT VALUATION; WETLANDS; WILDLIFE; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;
D O I
10.2307/1242453
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The statistical efficiency of conventional dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys can be improved by asking each respondent a second dichotomous choice question which depends on the response to the first question-if the first response is "yes," the second bid is some amount greater than the first bid; while, if the first response is "no," the second bid is some amount smaller. This "double-bounded" approach is shown to be asymptotically more efficient than the conventional, "single-bounded" approach. Using data from a survey of Californians regarding their willingness to pay for wetlands in the San Joaquin Valley, we show that, in a finite sample, the gain in efficiency can be very substantial.
引用
收藏
页码:1255 / 1263
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nonparticipation or Misspecification? The Impacts of Nonparticipation on Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation
    Timothy C. Haab
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1999, 14 : 443 - 461
  • [32] Construct validity of dichotomous and polychotomous choice contingent valuation questions
    Whitehead, JC
    Blomquist, GC
    Ready, RC
    Huang, JC
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1998, 11 (01): : 107 - 116
  • [33] Evaluating the validity of the dichotomous choice question format in contingent valuation
    Loomis J.
    Brown T.
    Lucero B.
    Peterson G.
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1997, 10 (2) : 109 - 123
  • [34] Addressing Negative Willingness to Pay in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation
    Alok K. Bohara
    Joe Kerkvliet
    Robert P. Berrens
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2001, 20 : 173 - 195
  • [35] Construct Validity of Dichotomous and Polychotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Questions
    John C. Whitehead
    Ju-Chin Huang
    Glenn C. Blomquist
    Richard C. Ready
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1998, 11 : 107 - 116
  • [36] Nonparticipation or misspecification? The impacts of nonparticipation on dichotomous choice contingent valuation
    Department of Economics, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, United States
    [J]. Environ. Resour. Econ., 4 (443-461):
  • [37] Nonparticipation or misspecification? The impacts of nonparticipation on dichotomous choice contingent valuation
    Haab, TC
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1999, 14 (04): : 443 - 461
  • [38] Evaluating the validity of the dichotomous choice question format in contingent valuation
    Loomis, John
    Brown, Thomas
    Lucero, Beatrice
    Peterson, George
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1997, 10 (02): : 109 - 123
  • [39] OPTIMAL BID SELECTION FOR DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS
    COOPER, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1993, 24 (01) : 25 - 40
  • [40] Economic valuation and its determinates of improve solid waste management services: A study of double-bounded contingent valuation in Gondar City Ethiopia
    Tassie, Kassahun
    Mulugeta, Anteneh
    Sewunet, Yenesew
    Asifaw, Getenet
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 10 (01):