Construct Validity of Dichotomous and Polychotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Questions

被引：0
|
作者：
John C. Whitehead
Ju-Chin Huang
Glenn C. Blomquist
Richard C. Ready
机构：
[1] East Carolina University,Department of Economics
[2] University of Kentucky,Department of Economics and Martin School of Public Policy and Administration
[3] Agricultural University of Norway,Department of Economics and Social Studies
来源：
Environmental and Resource Economics | 1998年 / 11卷
关键词：
contingent valuation; dichotomous choice; polychotomous choice; construct validity;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In this note we conduct construct validity tests for dichotomous choice (DC) and polychotomous choice (PC) contingent valuation questions. Contrary to previous results, we find that DC and PC estimates of willingness to pay are theoretically valid, convergent valid, and similar in terms of statistical precision. Similar to previous results, PC respondents are less sensitive to information than DC respondents. We conclude that DC and PC valuation questions are construct valid for this study. Sequential PC valuation questions could be used in studies where obtaining information about the certainty or intensity of respondent preferences would be useful.
引用
收藏
页码：107 / 116
页数：9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Construct validity of dichotomous and polychotomous choice contingent valuation questions
    Whitehead, JC
    Blomquist, GC
    Ready, RC
    Huang, JC
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1998, 11 (01): : 107 - 116
  • [2] Evaluating the validity of the dichotomous choice question format in contingent valuation
    Loomis J.
    Brown T.
    Lucero B.
    Peterson G.
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1997, 10 (2) : 109 - 123
  • [3] An experimental comparison of dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions and real purchase decisions
    Johannesson, M
    Liljas, B
    Johansson, PO
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 1998, 30 (05) : 643 - 647
  • [4] Trichotomous choice: A possible solution to dual response objectives in dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions
    Loomis, J
    Traynor, K
    Brown, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1999, 24 (02): : 572 - 583
  • [5] CONTINGENT VALUATION USING DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE MODELS
    LOOMIS, JB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEISURE RESEARCH, 1988, 20 (01) : 46 - 56
  • [6] Dichotomous choice contingent valuation probability distributions
    Kerr, GN
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2000, 44 (02) : 233 - 252
  • [7] Is referendum the same as dichotomous choice contingent valuation?
    Polonze, P
    van der Veen, A
    Geurts, P
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 2006, 82 (02) : 174 - 188
  • [8] Identifying inconsistent responses in dichotomous choice contingent valuation with follow-up questions
    Kang, Heechan
    Haab, Timothy C.
    Interis, Matthew G.
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 35 (03) : 396 - 411
  • [9] A randomized response approach to dichotomous choice contingent valuation
    Berrens, RP
    Bohara, AK
    Kerkvliet, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 79 (01) : 252 - 266
  • [10] Addressing negative willingness to pay in dichotomous choice contingent valuation
    Bohara, AK
    Kerkvliet, J
    Berrens, RP
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 20 (03): : 173 - 195
12345