A classification system for argumentation schemes

被引：36

作者：

Walton, Douglas ^{[1
]}

Macagno, Fabrizio ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Windsor, Dept Philosophy, CRRAR, 401 Sunset Ave, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada

[2] Univ Nova Lisboa, Inst Philosophy Language, Ave Berna 26, Lisbon, Portugal

来源：

ARGUMENT & COMPUTATION | 2016年 / 6卷 / 03期

关键词：

argument representation; argument interpretation; computational models of natural language argument;

D O I：

10.1080/19462166.2015.1123772

中图分类号：

TP18 [人工智能理论];

学科分类号：

081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;

摘要：

This paper explains the importance of classifying argumentation schemes, and outlines how schemes are being used in current research in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics on argument mining. It provides a survey of the literature on scheme classification. What are so far generally taken to represent a set of the most widely useful defeasible argumentation schemes are surveyed and explained systematically, including some that are difficult to classify. A new classification system covering these centrally important schemes is built.

引用

页码：219 / 245

页数：27

共 50 条

[31] Meta-level Argumentation with Argument Schemes
Mueller, Jann
Hunter, Anthony
Taylor, Philip
[J]. SCALABLE UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT, SUM 2013, 2013, 8078 : 92 - 105
[32] Argumentation Schemes for Statutory Interpretation: A Logical Analysis
Sartor, Giovanni
Walton, Doug
Macagno, Fabrizio
Rotolo, Antonino
[J]. LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2014, 271 : 11 - 20
[33] Challenges and Remedies for Identifying and Classifying Argumentation Schemes
Anthony, Robert
Kim, Mijung
[J]. ARGUMENTATION, 2015, 29 (01) : 81 - 113
[34] Aspects of Walton’s theory of argumentation schemes
Hansen, Hans V.
[J]. Hansen, Hans V. (hhansen@uwindsor.ca), 1600, College Publications (08): : 195 - 218
[35] A Qualitative Analysis of the Persuasive Properties of Argumentation Schemes
Ruiz-Dolz, Ramon
Taverner, Joaquin
Heras, Stella
Garcia-Fornes, Ana
Botti, Vicente
[J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 30TH ACM CONFERENCE ON USER MODELING, ADAPTATION AND PERSONALIZATION, UMAP 2022, 2022, : 1 - 11
[36] Analysis of Clinical Discussions Based on Argumentation Schemes
Al Qassas, Malik
Fogli, Daniela
Giacomin, Massimiliano
Guida, Giovanni
[J]. CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS/INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT/CONFERENCE ON HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, CENTERIS/PROJMAN / HCIST 2015, 2015, 64 : 282 - 289
[37] Argumentation Schemes for Reasoning about Factors with Dimensions
Atkinson, Katie
Bench-Capon, Trevor
Prakken, Henry
Wyner, Adam
[J]. LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2013, 259 : 39 - 48
[38] Towards Argumentation Schemes for Open Systems Dependability
Kido, Hiroyuki
Ohsawa, Yukio
Hirai, Makoto
Yuasa, Yoshifumi
Takai, Toshinori
[J]. 2014 IEEE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEPENDABLE, AUTONOMIC AND SECURE COMPUTING (DASC)/2014 IEEE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMBEDDED COMPUTING (EMBEDDEDCOM)/2014 IEEE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONF ON PERVASIVE INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING (PICOM), 2014, : 32 - +
[39] Challenges and Remedies for Identifying and Classifying Argumentation Schemes
Robert Anthony
Mijung Kim
[J]. Argumentation, 2015, 29 : 81 - 113
[40] CRITICAL QUESTIONS TO ARGUMENTATION SCHEMES IN STATUTORY INTERPRETATION
Araszkiewicz, Michal
[J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED LOGICS-IFCOLOG JOURNAL OF LOGICS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS, 2021, 8 (01): : 291 - 320

← 1 2 3 4 5 →