A classification system for argumentation schemes

被引:36
|
作者
Walton, Douglas [1 ]
Macagno, Fabrizio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Windsor, Dept Philosophy, CRRAR, 401 Sunset Ave, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
[2] Univ Nova Lisboa, Inst Philosophy Language, Ave Berna 26, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
argument representation; argument interpretation; computational models of natural language argument;
D O I
10.1080/19462166.2015.1123772
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper explains the importance of classifying argumentation schemes, and outlines how schemes are being used in current research in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics on argument mining. It provides a survey of the literature on scheme classification. What are so far generally taken to represent a set of the most widely useful defeasible argumentation schemes are surveyed and explained systematically, including some that are difficult to classify. A new classification system covering these centrally important schemes is built.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 245
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Network of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions
    Pyon, Sung-Jun
    Ri, Yong-sok
    [J]. INFORMAL LOGIC, 2022, 42 (04): : 787 - 833
  • [22] Designing Critical Questions for Argumentation Schemes
    Baumtrog, Michael D.
    [J]. ARGUMENTATION, 2021, 35 (04) : 629 - 643
  • [23] Argumentation schemes as a way of studying arguments
    Bobrova, Angelina S.
    [J]. FILOSOFSKII ZHURNAL, 2021, 14 (02): : 21 - 34
  • [24] Analogical Argument Schemes and Complex Argumentation
    Juthe, Andre
    [J]. INFORMAL LOGIC, 2015, 35 (03): : 378 - 445
  • [25] Computationally-Friendly Argumentation Schemes
    Dunin-Keplicz, Barbara
    Strachocka, Alina
    [J]. 2014 IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCES ON WEB INTELLIGENCE (WI) AND INTELLIGENT AGENT TECHNOLOGIES (IAT), VOL 3, 2014, : 167 - 174
  • [26] Argumentation Schemes for Legal Presumption of Causality
    Liepina, Ruta
    Wyner, Adam
    Sartor, Giovanni
    Lagioia, Francesca
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, ICAIL 2023, 2023, : 157 - 166
  • [27] Designing Critical Questions for Argumentation Schemes
    Michael D. Baumtrog
    [J]. Argumentation, 2021, 35 : 629 - 643
  • [28] Argumentation Schemes for Data Access Control
    Panisson, Alison R.
    Ali, Asad
    Mcburney, Peter
    Bordini, Rafael H.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT (COMMA 2018), 2018, 305 : 361 - 368
  • [29] Argumentation schemes for clinical decision support
    Sassoon, Isabel
    Kokciyan, Nadin
    Modgil, Sanjay
    Parsons, Simon
    [J]. ARGUMENT & COMPUTATION, 2021, 12 (03) : 329 - 355
  • [30] Using argumentation for the decomposition and classification of tasks for hybrid system development.
    Skabar, A
    Stranieri, A
    Zeleznikow, J
    [J]. PROGRESS IN CONNECTIONIST-BASED INFORMATION SYSTEMS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 814 - 817