Immunophenotypic studies of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

被引:19
|
作者
Olteanu, Horatiu [1 ]
Wang, Huan-You [2 ]
Chen, Weina [2 ]
McKenna, Robert [2 ]
Karandikar, Nitin [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Pathold, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Pathold, Dallas, TX USA
来源
BMC CLINICAL PATHOLOGY | 2008年 / 8卷
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1472-6890-8-13
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a common plasma cell dyscrasia, comprising the most indolent form of monoclonal gammopathy. However, approximately 25% of MGUS cases ultimately progress to plasma cell myeloma (PCM) or related diseases. It is difficult to predict which subset of patients will transform. In this study, we examined the immunophenotypic differences of plasma cells in MGUS and PCM. Methods: Bone marrow specimens from 32 MGUS patients and 32 PCM patients were analyzed by 4-color flow cytometry, using cluster analysis of ungated data, for the expression of several markers, including CD10, CD19, CD20, CD38, CD45, CD56 and surface and intracellular immunoglobulin light chains. Results: All MGUS patients had two subpopulations of plasma cells, one with a "normal" phenotype [CD19(+), CD56(-), CD38(bright +)] and one with an aberrant phenotype [either CD19(-)/CD56(+) or CD19(-)/CD56(-)]. The normal subpopulation ranged from 4.4 to 86% (mean 27%) of total plasma cells. Only 20 of 32 PCM cases showed an identifiable normal subpopulation at significantly lower frequency [range 0-32%, mean 3.3%, p << 0.001]. The plasma cells in PCM were significantly less likely to express CD19 [1/32 (3.1%) vs. 13/29 (45%), p << 0.001] and more likely to express surface immunoglobulin [21/32 (66%) vs. 3/28 (11%), p << 0.001], compared to MGUS. Those expressing CD19 did so at a significantly lower level than in MGUS, with no overlap in mean fluorescence intensities [174 +/- 25 vs. 430 +/- 34, p << 0.001]. There were no significant differences in CD56 expression [23/32 (72%) vs. 18/29 (62%), p = 0.29], CD45 expression [15/32 (47%) vs. 20/30 (67%), p = 0.10] or CD38 mean fluorescence intensities [6552 +/- 451 vs. 6365 +/- 420, p = 0.38]. Two of the six MGUS cases (33%) with >90% CD19(-) plasma cells showed progression of disease, whereas none of the cases with > 10% CD19(+) plasma cells evolved to PCM. Conclusion: MGUS cases with potential for disease progression appeared to lack CD19 expression on >90% of their plasma cells, displaying an immunophenotypic profile similar to PCM plasma cells. A higher relative proportion of CD19(+) plasma cells in MGUS may be associated with a lower potential for disease progression.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PERIPHERAL POLYNEUROPATHY AND MONOCLONAL GAMMOPATHY OF UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE
    KROLVANSTRAATEN, MJ
    ACKERSTAFF, RGA
    DEMAAT, CEM
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1985, 48 (07): : 706 - 708
  • [42] Prognostic factors in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Sackmann, Federico
    Arturo Pavlovsky, Miguel
    Corrado, Claudia
    Pizzolato, Marco
    Alejandre, Mariel
    Pavlovsky, Santiago
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2007, 93 (01) : 153 - 154
  • [43] Fracture risk in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Melton, LJ
    Rajkumar, SV
    Khosla, S
    Achenbach, SJ
    Oberg, AL
    Kyle, RA
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2004, 19 (01) : 25 - 30
  • [44] Genetic predisposition for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Ruiz-Delgado, Guillermo J.
    Ruiz-Arguelles, Guillermo J.
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 83 (05) : 601 - 602
  • [45] Demyelinating disease in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Galiè, E
    Pietrangeli, A
    Maschio, M
    Pace, A
    Vidiri, A
    Carosi, M
    Jandolo, B
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2003, 22 (02) : 337 - 339
  • [46] PRIMARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM AND MONOCLONAL GAMMOPATHY OF UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE
    MUNDIS, RJ
    KYLE, RA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1982, 77 (05) : 619 - 621
  • [47] Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a consensus statement
    Berenson, James R.
    Anderson, Kenneth C.
    Audell, Robert A.
    Boccia, Ralph V.
    Coleman, Morton
    Dimopoulos, Meletios A.
    Drake, Matthew T.
    Fonseca, Rafael
    Harousseau, Jean-Luc
    Joshua, Douglas
    Lonial, Sagar
    Niesvizky, Ruben
    Palumbo, Antonio
    Roodman, G. David
    San-Miguel, Jesus F.
    Singhal, Seema
    Weber, Donna M.
    Zangari, Maurizio
    Wirtschafter, Eric
    Yellin, Ori
    Kyle, Robert A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2010, 150 (01) : 28 - 38
  • [48] Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance - Reply
    Kyle, RA
    Rajkumar, SV
    Melton, LJ
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (26): : 2832 - 2832
  • [49] Maculopathy in Patients with Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance
    Smith, Stephen J.
    Johnson, Mark W.
    Ober, Michael D.
    Comer, Grant M.
    Smith, Brian D.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY RETINA, 2020, 4 (03): : 300 - 309
  • [50] Corneal deposits in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Nemeth Orsolya
    Tapaszto Beata
    Tar Sandor
    Szabo Viktoria
    Nagy Zoltan Zsolt
    Toth Jeannette
    Hamed Aryan
    Mikala Gabor
    Szentmary Nora
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2018, 159 (39) : 1575 - 1583