Immunophenotypic studies of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

被引:19
|
作者
Olteanu, Horatiu [1 ]
Wang, Huan-You [2 ]
Chen, Weina [2 ]
McKenna, Robert [2 ]
Karandikar, Nitin [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Pathold, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Pathold, Dallas, TX USA
来源
BMC CLINICAL PATHOLOGY | 2008年 / 8卷
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1472-6890-8-13
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a common plasma cell dyscrasia, comprising the most indolent form of monoclonal gammopathy. However, approximately 25% of MGUS cases ultimately progress to plasma cell myeloma (PCM) or related diseases. It is difficult to predict which subset of patients will transform. In this study, we examined the immunophenotypic differences of plasma cells in MGUS and PCM. Methods: Bone marrow specimens from 32 MGUS patients and 32 PCM patients were analyzed by 4-color flow cytometry, using cluster analysis of ungated data, for the expression of several markers, including CD10, CD19, CD20, CD38, CD45, CD56 and surface and intracellular immunoglobulin light chains. Results: All MGUS patients had two subpopulations of plasma cells, one with a "normal" phenotype [CD19(+), CD56(-), CD38(bright +)] and one with an aberrant phenotype [either CD19(-)/CD56(+) or CD19(-)/CD56(-)]. The normal subpopulation ranged from 4.4 to 86% (mean 27%) of total plasma cells. Only 20 of 32 PCM cases showed an identifiable normal subpopulation at significantly lower frequency [range 0-32%, mean 3.3%, p << 0.001]. The plasma cells in PCM were significantly less likely to express CD19 [1/32 (3.1%) vs. 13/29 (45%), p << 0.001] and more likely to express surface immunoglobulin [21/32 (66%) vs. 3/28 (11%), p << 0.001], compared to MGUS. Those expressing CD19 did so at a significantly lower level than in MGUS, with no overlap in mean fluorescence intensities [174 +/- 25 vs. 430 +/- 34, p << 0.001]. There were no significant differences in CD56 expression [23/32 (72%) vs. 18/29 (62%), p = 0.29], CD45 expression [15/32 (47%) vs. 20/30 (67%), p = 0.10] or CD38 mean fluorescence intensities [6552 +/- 451 vs. 6365 +/- 420, p = 0.38]. Two of the six MGUS cases (33%) with >90% CD19(-) plasma cells showed progression of disease, whereas none of the cases with > 10% CD19(+) plasma cells evolved to PCM. Conclusion: MGUS cases with potential for disease progression appeared to lack CD19 expression on >90% of their plasma cells, displaying an immunophenotypic profile similar to PCM plasma cells. A higher relative proportion of CD19(+) plasma cells in MGUS may be associated with a lower potential for disease progression.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] IgD monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Kinoshita, T
    Nagai, H
    Murate, T
    Saito, H
    Fukatsu, T
    Hotta, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 1997, 65 (02) : 169 - 172
  • [22] Prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Vuckovic, J
    Ilic, A
    Knezevic, N
    Marinkovic, M
    Zemunik, T
    Dubravcic, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1997, 97 (03) : 649 - 651
  • [23] Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance maculopathy
    Saffra, Norman
    Rakhamimov, Aleksandr
    Solomon, William B.
    Scheers-Masters, Joshua
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2013, 48 (06): : E168 - E170
  • [24] Immunophenotypic and DNA content characteristics of plasma cells in multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Almeida, J
    Orfao, A
    Mateo, G
    Ocqueteau, M
    García-Sanz, R
    Moro, MJ
    Hernandez, J
    Ortega, F
    Borrego, D
    Barez, A
    Mejido, M
    San Miguel, JF
    PATHOLOGIE BIOLOGIE, 1999, 47 (02): : 119 - 127
  • [25] PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY IN MONOCLONAL GAMMOPATHY OF UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE - PREVALENCE AND IMMUNOPATHOGENETIC STUDIES
    NOBILEORAZIO, E
    BARBIERI, S
    BALDINI, L
    MARMIROLI, P
    CARPO, M
    PREMOSELLI, S
    MANFREDINI, E
    SCARLATO, G
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1992, 85 (06): : 383 - 390
  • [26] Clinical practice:: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Blade, Joan
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (26): : 2765 - 2770
  • [27] Pathogenesis and progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Blade, J.
    Rosinol, L.
    Cibeira, M. T.
    de Larrea, C. F.
    LEUKEMIA, 2008, 22 (09) : 1651 - 1657
  • [28] Maculopathy in Patients with Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance
    Smith, Stephen J.
    Johnson, Mark W.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)
  • [29] Cytogenetic abnormalities in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Merz, Maximilian
    Hielscher, Thomas
    Hoffmann, Korbinian
    Seckinger, Anja
    Hose, Dirk
    Raab, Marc S.
    Hillengass, Jens
    Jauch, Anna
    Goldschmidt, Hartmut
    LEUKEMIA, 2018, 32 (12) : 2717 - 2719
  • [30] Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and bone tissue
    Bouvard, B.
    CORRESPONDANCES EN METABOLISMES HORMONES DIABETES ET NUTRITION, 2019, 23 (4-5): : 138 - 138