Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of the Speech of Adults with Hearing Impairment Based on Suprasegmental Factors, Speech Intelligibility, and Speech Acceptability

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Sung Eun [1 ,3 ]
Kim, HyangHee [2 ,3 ]
Sim, Hyun-Sub [4 ,5 ]
Nam, Chung Mo [6 ]
Choi, Jae Young [7 ]
Park, Eun Sook [2 ]
机构
[1] Severance Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Speech Clin, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept & Res Inst Rehabil Med, 250 Seongsanno, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Grad Program Speech & Language Pathol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Special Educ, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Interdisciplinary Program Commun Disorders, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Otolaryngol, Seoul, South Korea
来源
关键词
hearing impairment; perceptual evaluations of speech; suprasegmental factors; speech intelligibility; speech acceptability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background & Objectives: Patients with hearing impairments (HI) have problems communicating due to the lack of speech intelligibility (SI) and speech acceptability (SA). However, the speech evaluation in clinics is limited to evaluating SI and segmental factors. Hence, the present study examines how the speech of adults with HI are perceptually evaluated in terms of suprasegmental factors, SI, and SA, and specifically how suprasegmental factors may influence SI and SA. Methods: First, the auditory-perceptual suprasegmental profiles were created by including the upper 6 section items such as pitch, loudness, voice quality, resonance, intonation, and speech rate, and the lower 22 concrete items. Fifty-five subjects were separated into 2 groups based on the onset of HL (prelingual vs. postlingual) or the degree of HL (severe vs. profound). Subjects were asked to participate in picture description tasks, paragraph reading tasks, non-syllabic and wordnaming tasks. Five professional speech and language pathologists used the 100 mm Visual Analog Scale to measure the severity of the suprasegmental section items, SI, and SA. Results: First, there were significant differences in suprasegmental factors depending on the onset and the degree of HL; prelingual patients showed a relatively greater degree than postlingual patients, and the profound group demonstrated greater severity than the severe group. Second, SI and SA were relatively lower in the prelingual and profound group than in the postlingual and severe group. In addition, overall SA rates were lower than SI rates. Although these 2 rates showed high correlations in general, no significant correlations were observed in the postlingual group. Third, Pearson correlation analysis revealed that segmental factors were more highly correlated with SI, but suprasegmental factors were more highly correlated with SA. Results of multiple regression analysis implied that factors such as the percentage of consonants correct (PCC), percentage of vowels correct, and the severity of intonation and speech rates significantly influenced SI. However, PCC, the severity of intonation, and the resonance and speech rates significantly influenced SA. Discussion & Conclusion: The results of the present study verified that suprasegmental factors, SI, and SA are valuable indices that may be applied to the effective evaluation of various speech problems in adults with HI during an auditory-perceptual evaluation of speech.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 493
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Objective Measures of Perceptual Quality for Predicting Speech Intelligibility in Sensorineural Hearing Loss
    Chiaramello, E.
    Moriconi, S.
    Tognola, G.
    [J]. 2015 37TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2015, : 5577 - 5580
  • [32] The Effects of Contextual Priming and Alaryngeal Speech Mode on Auditory-Perceptual Ratings of Listener Comfort
    Failla, Sebastiano
    Al-Zanoon, Noor
    Smith, Natalie
    Doyle, Philip C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2021, 35 (06) : 934.e17 - 934.e23
  • [33] Children's speech recognition scores: The speech, intelligibility index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level
    Scollie, Susan D.
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2008, 29 (04): : 543 - 556
  • [34] Auditory-Perceptual Judgement of Speech-Language Pathologists in Fricative Distortion by EPG Task
    Kim, Ji-Yeong
    Woo, Seong-Tak
    Ha, Ji-Wan
    [J]. COMMUNICATION SCIENCES AND DISORDERS-CSD, 2021, 26 (04): : 897 - 908
  • [35] Effects of age on speech understanding in normal hearing listeners: Relationship between the auditory efferent system and speech intelligibility in noise
    Kim, SungHee
    Frisina, Robert D.
    Frisina, D. Robert
    [J]. SPEECH COMMUNICATION, 2006, 48 (07) : 855 - 862
  • [36] Childhood Dysarthria: Auditory-Perceptual Profiles Against the Background of Typical Speech Motor Development
    Schoelderle, Theresa
    Haas, Elisabet
    Ziegler, Wolfram
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2022, 65 (05): : 2114 - 2127
  • [37] AUDITORY TEMPORAL ACUITY OF HEARING IMPAIRED AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO SPEECH-INTELLIGIBILITY
    STOKER, RG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN AUDIOLOGY SOCIETY, 1978, 4 (01): : 24 - 29
  • [38] The effect of phoneme-based auditory training on speech intelligibility in hearing-aid users
    Koprowska, Aleksandra
    Marozeau, Jeremy
    Dau, Torsten
    Serman, Maja
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2023, 62 (11) : 1048 - 1058
  • [39] Speech Intelligibility Prediction for Hearing Aids Using an Auditory Model and Acoustic Parameters
    Titalim, Benita Angela
    Mawalim, Candy Olivia
    Okada, Shogo
    Unoki, Masashi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2022 ASIA-PACIFIC SIGNAL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING ASSOCIATION ANNUAL SUMMIT AND CONFERENCE (APSIPA ASC), 2022, : 1076 - 1084
  • [40] Comparison of Acoustic and Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation in Sustained Vowel and Connected Speech by Glottal Closure Pattern in Voice Disorders
    Lee, Eun-Jung
    Kim, Jaeock
    [J]. COMMUNICATION SCIENCES AND DISORDERS-CSD, 2020, 25 (03): : 738 - 749