Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of the Speech of Adults with Hearing Impairment Based on Suprasegmental Factors, Speech Intelligibility, and Speech Acceptability

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Sung Eun [1 ,3 ]
Kim, HyangHee [2 ,3 ]
Sim, Hyun-Sub [4 ,5 ]
Nam, Chung Mo [6 ]
Choi, Jae Young [7 ]
Park, Eun Sook [2 ]
机构
[1] Severance Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Speech Clin, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept & Res Inst Rehabil Med, 250 Seongsanno, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Grad Program Speech & Language Pathol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Special Educ, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Interdisciplinary Program Commun Disorders, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Otolaryngol, Seoul, South Korea
来源
关键词
hearing impairment; perceptual evaluations of speech; suprasegmental factors; speech intelligibility; speech acceptability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background & Objectives: Patients with hearing impairments (HI) have problems communicating due to the lack of speech intelligibility (SI) and speech acceptability (SA). However, the speech evaluation in clinics is limited to evaluating SI and segmental factors. Hence, the present study examines how the speech of adults with HI are perceptually evaluated in terms of suprasegmental factors, SI, and SA, and specifically how suprasegmental factors may influence SI and SA. Methods: First, the auditory-perceptual suprasegmental profiles were created by including the upper 6 section items such as pitch, loudness, voice quality, resonance, intonation, and speech rate, and the lower 22 concrete items. Fifty-five subjects were separated into 2 groups based on the onset of HL (prelingual vs. postlingual) or the degree of HL (severe vs. profound). Subjects were asked to participate in picture description tasks, paragraph reading tasks, non-syllabic and wordnaming tasks. Five professional speech and language pathologists used the 100 mm Visual Analog Scale to measure the severity of the suprasegmental section items, SI, and SA. Results: First, there were significant differences in suprasegmental factors depending on the onset and the degree of HL; prelingual patients showed a relatively greater degree than postlingual patients, and the profound group demonstrated greater severity than the severe group. Second, SI and SA were relatively lower in the prelingual and profound group than in the postlingual and severe group. In addition, overall SA rates were lower than SI rates. Although these 2 rates showed high correlations in general, no significant correlations were observed in the postlingual group. Third, Pearson correlation analysis revealed that segmental factors were more highly correlated with SI, but suprasegmental factors were more highly correlated with SA. Results of multiple regression analysis implied that factors such as the percentage of consonants correct (PCC), percentage of vowels correct, and the severity of intonation and speech rates significantly influenced SI. However, PCC, the severity of intonation, and the resonance and speech rates significantly influenced SA. Discussion & Conclusion: The results of the present study verified that suprasegmental factors, SI, and SA are valuable indices that may be applied to the effective evaluation of various speech problems in adults with HI during an auditory-perceptual evaluation of speech.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 493
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Auditory Models of Suprathreshold Distortion and Speech Intelligibility in Persons with Impaired Hearing
    Bernstein, Joshua G. W.
    Summers, Van
    Grassi, Elena
    Grant, Ken W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2013, 24 (04) : 307 - 328
  • [22] An Open Dataset of Connected Speech in Aphasia with Consensus Ratings of Auditory-Perceptual Features
    Ezzes, Zoe
    Schneck, Sarah M.
    Casilio, Marianne
    Fromm, Davida
    Mefferd, Antje S.
    de Riesthal, Michael
    Wilson, Stephen M.
    [J]. DATA, 2022, 7 (11)
  • [23] Prediction of speech intelligibility based on an auditory preprocessing model
    Christiansen, Claus
    Pedersen, Michael Syskind
    Dau, Torsten
    [J]. SPEECH COMMUNICATION, 2010, 52 (7-8) : 678 - 692
  • [24] Auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: comparing different speech tasks to identify children with and without laryngeal lesions
    Costa, Cintia Conceicao
    Leite, Ana Paula Dassie
    Madazio, Glaucya
    Behlau, Mara
    [J]. CODAS, 2023, 35 (02):
  • [25] The influence of listener experience, measurement scale and speech task on the reliability of auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality
    Alves, Jonatas do Nascimento
    de Almeida, Anna Alice Figueiredo
    Yamasaki, Rosiane
    Lopes, Leonardo Wanderley
    [J]. CODAS, 2024, 36 (03):
  • [26] EVALUATION OF 2 SPEECH ENHANCEMENT TECHNIQUES TO IMPROVE INTELLIGIBILITY FOR HEARING-IMPAIRED ADULTS
    MONTGOMERY, AA
    EDGE, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1988, 31 (03): : 386 - 393
  • [27] Improving Speech Intelligibility in Perceptual Wavelet Packet-Based Speech Coding for Cochlear Implants
    Dachasilaruk, Siriporn
    Bleeck, Stefan
    White, Paul
    [J]. 2014 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND INFORMATICS (BMEI 2014), 2014, : 323 - 328
  • [28] THE SPEECH OF ADULTS WITH ACQUIRED PROFOUND HEARING LOSSES .1. A PERCEPTUAL EVALUATION
    PLANT, G
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DISORDERS OF COMMUNICATION, 1993, 28 (03): : 273 - 288
  • [29] The Auditory-Visual Speech Benefit onWorking Memory in Older Adults with Hearing Impairment
    Frtusova, Jana B.
    Phillips, Natalie A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [30] Objective Measures of Perceptual Quality for Predicting Speech Intelligibility in Sensorineural Hearing Loss
    Chiaramello, E.
    Moriconi, S.
    Tognola, G.
    [J]. 2015 37TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2015, : 5577 - 5580