JURORS PERCEPTIONS OF EYEWITNESS AND HEARSAY EVIDENCE

被引：0

作者：

KOVERA, MB

PARK, RC

PENROD, SD

机构：

[1] UNIV MINNESOTA,SOCIAL PSYCHOL,MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55455

[2] UNIV MINNESOTA,LAW,MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55455

来源：

MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW | 1992年 / 76卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：703 / 722

页数：20

共 50 条

[21] The effectiveness of judicial instructions on eyewitness evidence in sensitizing jurors to suggestive identification procedures captured on video
Skalon, Alena
Beaudry, Jennifer L.
[J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY, 2020, 16 (04) : 565 - 594
[22] The effectiveness of judicial instructions on eyewitness evidence in sensitizing jurors to suggestive identification procedures captured on video
Alena Skalon
Jennifer L. Beaudry
[J]. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2020, 16 : 565 - 594
[23] POTENTIAL JURORS OPINIONS ON THE EFFECTS OF HYPNOSIS ON EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION
LABELLE, L
LAMARCHE, MC
LAURENCE, JR
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPNOSIS, 1990, 38 (04) : 315 - 319
[24] HEARSAY EVIDENCE
LANDAW, J
[J]. CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW, 1978, (JAN): : 57 - 57
[25] THE ABILITY OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS TO ESTIMATE THE ACCURACY OF EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATIONS
BRIGHAM, JC
BOTHWELL, RK
[J]. LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1983, 7 (01) : 19 - 30
[26] A Teaching Aid for Improving Jurors' Assessments of Eyewitness Accuracy
Pawlenko, Nell B.
Safer, Martin A.
Wise, Richard A.
Holfeld, Brett
[J]. APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 27 (02) : 190 - 197
[27] THE PSYCHOLOGY OF EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY - A COMPARISON OF EXPERTS AND PROSPECTIVE JURORS
KASSIN, SM
BARNDOLLAR, KA
[J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 22 (16) : 1241 - 1249
[28] Comparing the effectiveness of Henderson instructions and expert testimony: Which safeguard improves jurors’ evaluations of eyewitness evidence?
Angela M. Jones
Amanda N. Bergold
Marlee Kind Dillon
Steven D. Penrod
[J]. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2017, 13 : 29 - 52
[29] Comparing the effectiveness of Henderson instructions and expert testimony: Which safeguard improves jurors' evaluations of eyewitness evidence?
Jones, Angela M.
Bergold, Amanda N.
Dillon, Marlee Kind
Penrod, Steven D.
[J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY, 2017, 13 (01) : 29 - 52
[30] Eyewitness memory is still not common sense: Comparing jurors, judges and law enforcement to eyewitness experts
Benton, TR
Ross, DF
Bradshaw, E
Thomas, WN
Bradshaw, GS
[J]. APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 20 (01) : 115 - 129

← 1 2 3 4 5 →