Comparing the effectiveness of Henderson instructions and expert testimony: Which safeguard improves jurors’ evaluations of eyewitness evidence?

被引：0

|

作者：

Angela M. Jones

Amanda N. Bergold

Marlee Kind Dillon

Steven D. Penrod

机构：

[1] Texas State University,School of Criminal Justice

[2] CUNY,John Jay College & the Graduate Center

来源：

Journal of Experimental Criminology | 2017年 / 13卷

关键词：

Expert testimony; Judicial instructions; Juror decision making; Eyewitness identification; New Jersey Supreme Court;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：29 / 52

页数：23

相关论文

共 5 条

[1] Comparing the effectiveness of Henderson instructions and expert testimony: Which safeguard improves jurors' evaluations of eyewitness evidence?
Jones, Angela M.
Bergold, Amanda N.
Dillon, Marlee Kind
Penrod, Steven D.
[J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY, 2017, 13 (01) : 29 - 52
[2] Mock jurors' evaluations of eyewitness identification evidence based on appearance change and associated instructions
Lockamyeir, Robert F.
Carlson, Curt A.
[J]. PSYCHOLOGY CRIME & LAW, 2024,
[3] The effectiveness of judicial instructions on eyewitness evidence in sensitizing jurors to suggestive identification procedures captured on video
Skalon, Alena
Beaudry, Jennifer L.
[J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY, 2020, 16 (04) : 565 - 594
[4] The effectiveness of judicial instructions on eyewitness evidence in sensitizing jurors to suggestive identification procedures captured on video
Alena Skalon
Jennifer L. Beaudry
[J]. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2020, 16 : 565 - 594
[5] Educating Jurors about Forensic Evidence: Using an Expert Witness and Judicial Instructions to Mitigate the Impact of Invalid Forensic Science Testimony
Eastwood, Joseph
Caldwell, Jiana
[J]. JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2015, 60 (06) : 1523 - 1528