Exploring How Homophily and Accessibility Can Facilitate Polarization in Social Networks

被引:11
|
作者
Taylor, Cameron E. [1 ]
Mantzaris, Alexander V. [1 ]
Garibay, Ivan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Stat, TC2 4000 Cent Florida Blvd, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Ind Engn & Management Syst, Engr 2 4000 Cent Florida Blvd, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
political polarization; echo-chambers; social networks; binary voter model; discussion dynamics; opinion dynamics model;
D O I
10.3390/info9120325
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Polarization in online social networks has gathered a significant amount of attention in the research community and in the public sphere due to stark disagreements with millions of participants on topics surrounding politics, climate, the economy and other areas where an agreement is required. This work investigates into greater depth a type of model that can produce ideological segregation as a result of polarization depending on the strength of homophily and the ability of users to access similar minded individuals. Whether increased access can induce larger amounts of societal separation is important to investigate, and this work sheds further insight into the phenomenon. Center to the hypothesis of homophilic alignments in friendship generation is that of a discussion group or community. These are modeled and the investigation into their effect on the dynamics of polarization is presented. The social implications demonstrate that initial phases of an ideological exchange can result in increased polarization, although a consensus in the long run is expected and that the separation between groups is amplified when groups are constructed with ideological homophilic preferences.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The twin impact of homophily and accessibility on ideological polarization
    Davies, Stephen
    [J]. CSS 2017: THE 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF THE AMERICAS, 2017,
  • [2] Exploring the Characteristics of Innovation Adoption in Social Networks: Structure, Homophily, and Strategy
    Li, Yongli
    Wu, Chong
    Luo, Peng
    Zhang, Wei
    [J]. ENTROPY, 2013, 15 (07) : 2662 - 2678
  • [3] Purity Homophily in Social Networks
    Dehghani, Morteza
    Johnson, Kate
    Hoover, Joe
    Sagi, Eyal
    Garten, Justin
    Parmar, Niki Jitendra
    Vaisey, Stephen
    Iliev, Rumen
    Graham, Jesse
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2016, 145 (03) : 366 - 375
  • [4] Fuzzy Homophily In Social Networks
    Heidarpour, Mostafa
    Emami, Hojjat
    Shirazi, Hossein
    [J]. 2015 4th Iranian Joint Congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Systems (CFIS), 2015,
  • [5] How Enterprise Social Media Can Facilitate Innovation
    Patroni, Joanne
    von Briel, Frederik
    Recker, Jan
    [J]. IT PROFESSIONAL, 2016, 18 (06) : 34 - 41
  • [6] A genetic basis for homophily in social networks
    Settle, Jaime
    Fowler, James
    [J]. BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2009, 39 (06) : 680 - 680
  • [7] Discovering Homophily in Online Social Networks
    De Salve, Andrea
    Guidi, Barbara
    Ricci, Laura
    Mori, Paolo
    [J]. MOBILE NETWORKS & APPLICATIONS, 2018, 23 (06): : 1715 - 1726
  • [8] A simple model of homophily in social networks
    Currarini, Sergio
    Matheson, Jesse
    Vega-Redondo, Fernando
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 90 : 18 - 39
  • [9] Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks
    McPherson, M
    Smith-Lovin, L
    Cook, JM
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2001, 27 : 415 - 444
  • [10] Discovering Homophily in Online Social Networks
    Andrea De Salve
    Barbara Guidi
    Laura Ricci
    Paolo Mori
    [J]. Mobile Networks and Applications, 2018, 23 : 1715 - 1726