Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks

被引:10157
|
作者
McPherson, M [1 ]
Smith-Lovin, L
Cook, JM
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Sociol, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Sociol, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
human ecology; voluntary associations; organizations;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Similarity breeds connection. This principle-the homophily principle-structures network ties of every type, including marriage, friendship, work, advice, support, information transfer, exchange, comembership, and other types of relationship. The result is that people's personal networks are homogeneous with regard to many sociodemographic, behavioral, and intrapersonal characteristics. Homophily limits people's social worlds in a way that has powerful implications for the information they receive, the attitudes they form, and the interactions they experience. Homophily in race and ethnicity creates the strongest divides in our personal environments, with age, religion, education, occupation, and gender following in roughly that order. Geographic propinquity, families, organizations, and isomorphic positions in social systems all create contexts in which homophilous relations form. Ties between nonsimilar individuals also dissolve at a higher rate, which sets the stage for the formation of niches (localized positions) within social space. We argue for more research on: (a) the basic ecological processes that link organizations, associations, cultural communities, social movements, and many other social forms; (b) the impact of multiplex ties on the patterns of homophily; and (c) the dynamics of network change over time through which networks and other social entities co-evolve.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 444
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do Birds of a Feather Watch Each Other? Homophily and Social Surveillance in Location Based Social Networks
    Guha, Shion
    Wicker, Stephen B.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK AND SOCIAL COMPUTING (CSCW'15), 2015, : 1010 - 1020
  • [2] Birds of a feather (Homophily, Southern US)
    Reed, JS
    [J]. SOUTHERN CULTURES, 2003, 9 (02) : 84 - 90
  • [3] Birds of a Feather? Exploring Homophily in Nonprofit Leadership
    Kuenzi, Kerry
    Evans, Lindsey L.
    Stewart, Amanda J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NONPROFIT EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP, 2023, 13 (01) : 23 - 39
  • [4] Birds of a Feather: The Impact of Homophily on the Propensity to Follow Financial Advice
    Stolper, Oscar
    Walter, Andreas
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2019, 32 (02): : 524 - 563
  • [5] Birds of a feather scam together: Trustworthiness homophily in a business network
    Barone, Mauro
    Coscia, Michele
    [J]. SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2018, 54 : 228 - 237
  • [6] Birds of a feather locate together? Foursquare checkins and personality homophily
    Noe, Nyala
    Whitaker, Roger M.
    Chorley, Martin J.
    Pollet, Thomas V.
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 58 : 343 - 353
  • [7] Birds of a Feather Flock Together: A Study of Status Homophily in HRI
    Shahrezaie, Roya Salek
    Anima, Bashira Akter
    Feil-Seifer, David
    [J]. SOCIAL ROBOTICS, ICSR 2021, 2021, 13086 : 281 - 291
  • [8] Homophily and life expectancy: Do birds of a feather live longer together?
    Ebel, D
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2005, 45 : 507 - 507
  • [9] Birds of a Feather Get Angrier Together: Social Media News Use and Social Media Political Homophily as Antecedents of Political Anger
    Cheng, Zicheng
    Marcos-Marne, Hugo
    de Zuniga, Homero Gil
    [J]. POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2024, 46 (02) : 1171 - 1187
  • [10] Birds of a feather flock together - and fall ill? Migrant homophily and health in Sweden
    Rostila, Mikael
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2010, 32 (03) : 382 - 399