Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks

被引:10157
|
作者
McPherson, M [1 ]
Smith-Lovin, L
Cook, JM
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Sociol, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Sociol, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
human ecology; voluntary associations; organizations;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Similarity breeds connection. This principle-the homophily principle-structures network ties of every type, including marriage, friendship, work, advice, support, information transfer, exchange, comembership, and other types of relationship. The result is that people's personal networks are homogeneous with regard to many sociodemographic, behavioral, and intrapersonal characteristics. Homophily limits people's social worlds in a way that has powerful implications for the information they receive, the attitudes they form, and the interactions they experience. Homophily in race and ethnicity creates the strongest divides in our personal environments, with age, religion, education, occupation, and gender following in roughly that order. Geographic propinquity, families, organizations, and isomorphic positions in social systems all create contexts in which homophilous relations form. Ties between nonsimilar individuals also dissolve at a higher rate, which sets the stage for the formation of niches (localized positions) within social space. We argue for more research on: (a) the basic ecological processes that link organizations, associations, cultural communities, social movements, and many other social forms; (b) the impact of multiplex ties on the patterns of homophily; and (c) the dynamics of network change over time through which networks and other social entities co-evolve.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 444
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Homophily influences ranking of minorities in social networks
    Karimi, Fariba
    Genois, Mathieu
    Wagner, Claudia
    Singer, Philipp
    Strohmaier, Markus
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [32] Birds of Different Feathers Cooperate Together: No Evidence for Altruism Homophily in Networks
    Simpson, Brent
    Brashears, Matthew
    Gladstone, Eric
    Harrell, Ashley
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 1 : 542 - 564
  • [33] BIRDS OF A FEATHER
    Zorich, Zach
    [J]. ARCHAEOLOGY, 2020, 73 (03) : 18 - 18
  • [34] BIRDS OF A FEATHER
    GRAYSON, M
    [J]. HOSPITALS & HEALTH NETWORKS, 1994, 68 (18): : 5 - 5
  • [35] Birds of a feather
    Schechter, B
    [J]. NEW SCIENTIST, 1999, 161 (2170) : 30 - 33
  • [36] 'Birds of a Feather'
    Piccirilli, D
    [J]. CLAVIER, 1999, 38 (07): : 38 - 38
  • [37] Birds of a feather
    Robertson, B
    [J]. COMPUTER GRAPHICS WORLD, 2001, 24 (01) : 22 - +
  • [38] Birds of a Feather
    Borchardt, John K.
    [J]. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 133 (10) : 46 - 50
  • [39] Birds of a feather
    Mehta, SN
    [J]. FORTUNE, 2002, 146 (07) : 197 - +
  • [40] BIRDS OF A FEATHER
    BARNARD, C
    [J]. NEW SCIENTIST, 1979, 83 (1172) : 818 - 820