Birds of a feather scam together: Trustworthiness homophily in a business network

被引:13
|
作者
Barone, Mauro [1 ]
Coscia, Michele [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Agenzia Entrate Ufficio Econ Stat, Via C Colombo 426 C-D, I-00145 Rome, Italy
[2] Naxys Univ Namur, Rempart Vierge 8, B-5000 Namur, Belgium
[3] Harvard Univ, Ctr Int Dev, 79 Jfk St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Tax evasion; Fraud detection; Complex networks;
D O I
10.1016/j.socnet.2018.01.009
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Estimating the trustworthiness of a set of actors when all the available information is provided by the actors themselves is a hard problem. When two actors have conflicting reports about each other, how do we establish which of the two (if any) deserves our trust? In this paper, we model this scenario as a network problem: actors are nodes in a network and their reports about each other are the edges of the network. To estimate their trustworthiness levels, we develop an iterative framework which looks at all the reports about each connected actor pair to define its trustworthiness balance. We apply this framework to a customer/supplier business network. We show that our trustworthiness score is a significant predictor of the likelihood a business will pay a fine if audited. We show that the market network is characterized by homophily: businesses tend to connect to partners with similar trustworthiness degrees. This suggests that the topology of the network influences the behavior of the actors composing it, indicating that market regulatory efforts should take into account network theory to prevent further degeneration and failures. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 237
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Birds of a feather locate together? Foursquare checkins and personality homophily
    Noe, Nyala
    Whitaker, Roger M.
    Chorley, Martin J.
    Pollet, Thomas V.
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 58 : 343 - 353
  • [2] Birds of a Feather Flock Together: A Study of Status Homophily in HRI
    Shahrezaie, Roya Salek
    Anima, Bashira Akter
    Feil-Seifer, David
    [J]. SOCIAL ROBOTICS, ICSR 2021, 2021, 13086 : 281 - 291
  • [3] Homophily and life expectancy: Do birds of a feather live longer together?
    Ebel, D
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2005, 45 : 507 - 507
  • [4] Birds of a feather flock together - and fall ill? Migrant homophily and health in Sweden
    Rostila, Mikael
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2010, 32 (03) : 382 - 399
  • [5] Birds of a feather (Homophily, Southern US)
    Reed, JS
    [J]. SOUTHERN CULTURES, 2003, 9 (02) : 84 - 90
  • [6] Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks
    McPherson, M
    Smith-Lovin, L
    Cook, JM
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2001, 27 : 415 - 444
  • [7] Do birds of a feather certify together? The impact of board interlocks on CSR certification homophily
    Briseno-Garcia, Arturo
    William Husted, Bryan
    Arango-Herera, Eduardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 144 : 336 - 344
  • [8] Birds of a Feather? Exploring Homophily in Nonprofit Leadership
    Kuenzi, Kerry
    Evans, Lindsey L.
    Stewart, Amanda J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NONPROFIT EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP, 2023, 13 (01) : 23 - 39
  • [9] Birds of a feather: homophily and sexual network structure in sub-Saharan Africa
    Kenyon, C.
    Colebunders, R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2013, 24 (03) : 211 - 215
  • [10] Keeping Birds of a Feather Together
    Goodson, James L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2012, 24 (03) : 525 - 526