The twin impact of homophily and accessibility on ideological polarization

被引:0
|
作者
Davies, Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mary Washington, Fredericksburg, VA 22401 USA
关键词
Opinion Dynamics models; political polarization; POLITICAL POLARIZATION; CULTURE; DYNAMICS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1145/3145574.3145586
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We present an agent-based model to explore the causes of one aspect of ideological polarization: the extent to which members of a society have social ties only with those they agree with. Specifically, we look at two variables that affect how an artificial social network structure is built: homophily, or the preference of individuals to form connections with others of the same "kind"; and accessibility, or the ease with which agents can form connections to others distant from it, as opposed to only local agents in its immediate vicinity. Our model builds a graph according to these two parameters, and then executes the classic Binary Voter Model (BVM) process on it whereby connected nodes influence one another's opinions. We find that counter to our original hypothesis, increasing the society's accessibility decreases its polarization, especially for high levels of homophily. Also, we discover that the rate at which agents form and dissolve friendships during the simulation plays a nuanced role in the way the society evolves.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring How Homophily and Accessibility Can Facilitate Polarization in Social Networks
    Taylor, Cameron E.
    Mantzaris, Alexander V.
    Garibay, Ivan
    [J]. INFORMATION, 2018, 9 (12)
  • [2] The impact of party polarization on ideological voting
    Lachat, Romain
    [J]. ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2008, 27 (04) : 687 - 698
  • [3] Homophily and polarization in the age of misinformation
    Bessi, Alessandro
    Petroni, Fabio
    Del Vicario, Michela
    Zollo, Fabiana
    Anagnostopoulos, Aris
    Scala, Antonio
    Caldarelli, Guido
    Quattrociocchi, Walter
    [J]. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL-SPECIAL TOPICS, 2016, 225 (10): : 2047 - 2059
  • [4] Homophily and polarization in the age of misinformation
    Alessandro Bessi
    Fabio Petroni
    Michela Del Vicario
    Fabiana Zollo
    Aris Anagnostopoulos
    Antonio Scala
    Guido Caldarelli
    Walter Quattrociocchi
    [J]. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 2016, 225 : 2047 - 2059
  • [5] Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization
    Dandekar, Pranav
    Goel, Ashish
    Lee, David T.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (15) : 5791 - 5796
  • [6] Viral Misinformation: The Role of Homophily and Polarization
    Bessi, Alessandro
    Petroni, Fabio
    Del Vicario, Michela
    Zollo, Fabiana
    Anagnostopoulos, Aris
    Scala, Antonio
    Caldarelli, Guido
    Quattrocciocchi, Walter
    [J]. WWW'15 COMPANION: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD WIDE WEB, 2015, : 355 - 356
  • [7] Choosing peers: Homophily and polarization in groups
    Baccara, Mariagiovanna
    Yariv, Leeat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2016, 165 : 152 - 178
  • [8] Audit engagement partner ideology, ideological homophily, and audit quality
    Goenner, Cullen
    Guo, Xiaoli
    Notbohm, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2024, 51 (5-6) : 1161 - 1192
  • [9] Ideological polarization and the media
    Melki, Mickael
    Pickering, Andrew
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2014, 125 (01) : 36 - 39
  • [10] Ideological polarization and corporate lobbying activity: The contingent impact of corruption distance
    Lee, Jeoung Yul
    Jimenez, Alfredo
    Choi, Seong-jin
    Choi, Yun Hyeong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 141 : 448 - 461