Expanding the indications of robotic surgery in urology: A systematic review of the literature

被引:29
|
作者
Pal, Raj P. [1 ]
Koupparis, Anthony J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Southmead Hosp, Bristol Urol Inst, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
Robot-assisted surgery; Robotic surgery; Urology;
D O I
10.1016/j.aju.2018.05.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the recent developments in robotic urological surgery, as the introduction of robotic technology has overcome many of the difficulties of pure laparoscopic surgery enabling surgeons to perform complex minimally invasive procedures with a shorter learning curve. Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) is now offered as the standard for various surgical procedures across multiple specialities. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed to identify studies evaluating robot-assisted simple prostatectomy, salvage radical prostatectomy, surgery for urolithiasis, distal ureteric reconstruction, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, augmentation ileocystoplasty, and artificial urinary sphincter insertion. Article titles, abstracts, and full text manuscripts were screened to identify relevant studies, which then underwent data extraction and analysis. Results: In all, 72 studies evaluating the above techniques were identified. Almost all studies were retrospective single-arm case series. RAS appears to be associated with reduced morbidity, less blood loss, reduced length of stay, and comparable clinical outcomes in comparison to the corresponding open procedures, whilst having a shorter operative duration and learning curve compared to the equivalent laparoscopic techniques. Conclusion: Emerging data demonstrate that the breadth and complexity of urological procedures performed using the da Vinci (R) platform (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is continually expanding. There is a gaining consensus that RAS is producing promising surgical results in a wide range of procedures. A major limitation of the current literature is the sparsity of comparative trials evaluating these procedures. (C) 2018 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Arab Association of Urology.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 284
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Learning Curves of Major Laparoscopic and Robotic Procedures in Urology: A Systematic Review
    Chahal, B.
    Aydin, A.
    Amin, M. S. A.
    Khan, A.
    Khan, M. S.
    Ahmed, K.
    Dasgupta, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 110
  • [42] The learning curves of major laparoscopic and robotic procedures in urology: a systematic review
    Chahal, Baldev
    Aydin, Abdullatif
    Amin, Mohammad S. A.
    Khan, Azhar
    Khan, Muhammad S.
    Ahmed, Kamran
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 109 (07) : 2037 - 2057
  • [43] Robotic surgery in urology: a review from the beginning to the single-site
    De Marchi, Davide
    Mantica, Guglielmo
    Tafuri, Alessandro
    Giusti, Guido
    Gaboardi, Franco
    AME MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 7
  • [44] Systematic review analysis of robotic and transanal approaches in TME surgery- A systematic review of the current literature in regard to challenges in rectal cancer surgery
    Grass, Julia K.
    Perez, Daniel R.
    Izbicki, Jakob R.
    Reeh, Matthias
    EJSO, 2019, 45 (04): : 498 - 509
  • [45] Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of the literature
    Michail Kornaropoulos
    Demetrios Moris
    Eliza W. Beal
    Marinos C. Makris
    Apostolos Mitrousias
    Athanasios Petrou
    Evangelos Felekouras
    Adamantios Michalinos
    Michail Vailas
    Dimitrios Schizas
    Alexandros Papalampros
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 4382 - 4392
  • [46] Systematic Literature Review on Hybrid Robotic Vehicles
    Gomes, Diogo F.
    Pinto, Vitor H.
    ROBOTICS, 2024, 13 (03)
  • [47] Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of the literature
    Kornaropoulos, Michail
    Moris, Demetrios
    Beal, Eliza W.
    Makris, Marinos C.
    Mitrousias, Apostolos
    Petrou, Athanasios
    Felekouras, Evangelos
    Michalinos, Adamantios
    Vailas, Michail
    Schizas, Dimitrios
    Papalampros, Alexandros
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (11): : 4382 - 4392
  • [48] Robotic Process Automation: Systematic Literature Review
    Ivancic, Lucija
    Vugec, Dalia Susa
    Vuksic, Vesna Bosilj
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT: BLOCKCHAIN AND CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE FORUM, 2019, 361 : 280 - 295
  • [49] Conflict of interest and sponsorship of Australian robotic vs. non-robotic urology surgery literature
    Jackson, Stuart
    Lai, Rebecca
    Gore, Neel
    Sasidharan, Prashanth
    Kam, Jonathan
    Fernando, Hilary
    Vasilaras, Arthur
    Leslie, Scott
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 : 86 - 86
  • [50] Robotic surgery in urology:: fact or fantasy?
    Binder, J
    Bräutigam, R
    Jonas, D
    Bentas, W
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 94 (08) : 1183 - 1187