Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of the literature

被引:63
|
作者
Kornaropoulos, Michail [1 ]
Moris, Demetrios [2 ]
Beal, Eliza W. [3 ,4 ]
Makris, Marinos C. [1 ]
Mitrousias, Apostolos [1 ]
Petrou, Athanasios [5 ]
Felekouras, Evangelos [6 ]
Michalinos, Adamantios [6 ]
Vailas, Michail [6 ]
Schizas, Dimitrios [6 ]
Papalampros, Alexandros [6 ]
机构
[1] G Genimatas Gen Hosp, Dept Surg 1, Athens, Greece
[2] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Res Inst, 9500 Euclid Ave,NE60, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] James Canc Hosp & Solove Res Inst, Columbus, OH USA
[5] Nicosia Teaching Hosp, Hepatobiliary & Surg Oncol Dept, Nicosia, Cyprus
[6] Laikon Gen Hosp, Dept Surg 1, Athens, Greece
关键词
Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Open; Robotic; Robotics; Da Vinci; Minimally invasive; Whipple procedure; Pancreatic surgery; INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; PANCREATIC FISTULA; LAPAROSCOPIC PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; RISK-FACTORS; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; CANCER; COMPLICATIONS; SCORE; COST;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-017-5523-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex operation with high perioperative morbidity and mortality, even in the highest volume centers. Since the development of the robotic platform, the number of reports on robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery has been on the rise. This article reviews the current state of completely robotic PD. Materials and Methods A systematic literature search was performed including studies published between January 2000 and July 2016 reporting PDs in which all procedural steps (dissection, resection and reconstruction) were performed robotically. Results Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 738 patients. Data regarding perioperative outcomes such as operative time, blood loss, mortality, morbidity, conversion and oncologic outcomes were analyzed. No major differences were observed in mortality, morbidity and oncologic parameters, between robotic and non-robotic approaches. However, operative time was longer in robotic PD, whereas the estimated blood loss was lower. The conversion rate to laparotomy was 6.5-7.8%. Conclusions Robotic PD is feasible and safe in high-volume institutions, where surgeons are experienced and medical staff are appropriately trained. Randomized controlled trials are required to further investigate outcomes of robotic PD. Additionally, cost analysis and data on long-term oncologic outcomes are needed to evaluate cost-effectiveness of the robotic approach in comparison with the open technique.
引用
收藏
页码:4382 / 4392
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of the literature
    Michail Kornaropoulos
    Demetrios Moris
    Eliza W. Beal
    Marinos C. Makris
    Apostolos Mitrousias
    Athanasios Petrou
    Evangelos Felekouras
    Adamantios Michalinos
    Michail Vailas
    Dimitrios Schizas
    Alexandros Papalampros
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 4382 - 4392
  • [2] A systematic review on robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Cirocchi, Roberto
    Partelli, Stefano
    Trastulli, Stefano
    Coratti, Andrea
    Parisi, Amilcare
    Falconi, Massimo
    [J]. SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2013, 22 (04): : 238 - 246
  • [3] Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review
    Boggi, Ugo
    Amorese, Gabriella
    Vistoli, Fabio
    Caniglia, Fabio
    De Lio, Nelide
    Perrone, Vittorio
    Barbarello, Linda
    Belluomini, Mario
    Signori, Stefano
    Mosca, Franco
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (01): : 9 - 23
  • [4] Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review
    Ugo Boggi
    Gabriella Amorese
    Fabio Vistoli
    Fabio Caniglia
    Nelide De Lio
    Vittorio Perrone
    Linda Barbarello
    Mario Belluomini
    Stefano Signori
    Franco Mosca
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29 : 9 - 23
  • [5] Total robotic surgery for pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with rectal cancer anterior resection: A case report and literature review
    Jiang, QunGuang
    Li, TaiYuan
    Liu, DongNing
    Tang, Cheng
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (19)
  • [6] Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Long Peng
    Shengrong Lin
    Yong Li
    Weidong Xiao
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 3085 - 3097
  • [7] Pancreaticoduodenectomy following total gastrectomy: A case report and literature review
    Yokoyama, Satoshi
    Sekioka, Akinori
    Ueno, Kohei
    Higashide, Yasuhiro
    Okishio, Yuko
    Kawaguchi, Nao
    Hagihara, Takeshi
    Yamada, Harumi
    Kamimura, Ryo
    Kuwahara, Michio
    Ichimiya, Masato
    Utsunomiya, Hirofumi
    Uyama, Shiro
    Kato, Hiroaki
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (10) : 2721 - 2724
  • [8] Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Peng, Long
    Lin, Shengrong
    Li, Yong
    Xiao, Weidong
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (08): : 3085 - 3097
  • [9] Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy, comparing therapeutic indexes; a systematic review
    Mantzavinou, Artemis
    Uppara, Mallikarjuna
    Chan, Jeremy
    Patel, Bijendra
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 101
  • [10] Pancreaticoduodenectomy following total gastrectomy:A case report and literature review
    Satoshi Yokoyama
    Akinori Sekioka
    Kohei Ueno
    Yasuhiro Higashide
    Yuko Okishio
    Nao Kawaguchi
    Takeshi Hagihara
    Harumi Yamada
    Ryo Kamimura
    Michio Kuwahara
    Masato Ichimiya
    Hirofumi Utsunomiya
    Shiro Uyama
    Hiroaki Kato
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, (10) : 2721 - 2724