Passive leg raising as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in patients with severe sepsis

被引:0
|
作者
Dong, Zhou-zhou [1 ]
Fang, Qiang [2 ]
Zheng, Xia [2 ]
Shi, Heng [2 ]
机构
[1] Lihuili Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Ningbo Med Ctr, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Sch Med, Intens Care Unit, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Passive leg raising; Volume resuscitation; Hemodynamic monitoring; Stroke volume index; Central venous pressure; Severe sepsis; Fluid responsiveness; ROC curve;
D O I
10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2012.03.006
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: In the management of critically ill patients, the assessment of volume responsiveness and the decision to administer a fluid bolus constitute a common dilemma for physicians. Static indices of cardiac preload are poor predictors of volume responsiveness. Passive leg raising (PLR) mimics an endogenous volume expansion (VE) that can be used to predict fluid responsiveness. This study was to assess the changes in stroke volume index (SVI) induced by PLR as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. METHODS: This was a prospective study. Thirty-two mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis were admitted for VE in ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine and Ningbo Medical Treatment Center Lihuili Hospital from May 2010 to December 2011. Patients with non-sinus rhythm or arrhythmia, parturients, and amputation of the lower limbs were excluded. Measurements of SVI were obtained in a semi-recumbent position (baseline) and during PLR by the technique of pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) system prior to VE. Measurements were repeated after VE (500 mL 6% hydroxyethyl starch infusion within 30 minutes) to classify patients as either volume responders or non-responders based on their changes in stroke volume index (Delta SVI) over 15%. Heart rate (HR), systolic artery blood pressure (ABPs), diastolic artery blood pressure (ABPd), mean arterial blood pressure (ABPm), mean central venous pressure (CVPm) and cardiac index (CI) were compared between the two groups. The changes of ABPs, ABPm, CVPm, and SVI after PLR and VE were compared with the indices at the baseline. The ROC curve was drawn to evaluate the value of Delta SVI and the change of CVPm (Delta CVPm) in predicting volume responsiveness. SPSS 17.0 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Among the 32 patients, 22 were responders and 10 were non-responders. After PLR among the responders, some hemodynamic variables ( including ABPs, ABPd, ABPm and CVPm) were significantly elevated (101.2 +/- 17.6 vs. 118.6 +/- 23.7, P=0.03; 52.8 +/- 10.7 vs. 64.8 +/- 10.7, P=0.006; 68.3 +/- 11.7 vs. 81.9 +/- 14.4, P=0.008; 6.8 +/- 3.2 vs. 11.9 +/- 4.0, P=0.001). After PLR, the area under curve (AUC) and the ROC curve of Delta SVI and Delta CVPm for predicting the responsiveness after VE were 0.882 +/- 0.061 (95% CI 0.759-1.000) and 0.805 +/- 0.079 ( 95% CI 0.650-0.959) when the cut-off levels of Delta SVI and Delta CVPm were 8.8% and 12.7%, the sensitivities were 72.7% and 72.7%, and the specifi cities were 80% and 80%. CONCLUSION: Changes in Delta SVI and Delta CVPm induced by PLR are accurate indices for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 196
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Changes in aortic blood flow induced by passive leg raising predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients
    Lafanechere, A.
    Pene, F.
    Goulenok, C.
    Delahaye, A.
    Mallet, V.
    Choukroun, G.
    Chiche, J. D.
    Mira, J. P.
    Cariou, A.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 10 (05):
  • [32] The passive leg-raising maneuver cannot accurately predict fluid responsiveness in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension
    Mahjoub, Yazine
    Touzeau, Jeremie
    Airapetian, Norair
    Lorne, Emmanuel
    Hijazi, Mustapha
    Zogheib, Elie
    Tinturier, Francois
    Slama, Michel
    Dupont, Herve
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (09) : 1824 - 1829
  • [33] Prediction of fluid responsiveness in intensive care (PREFERENCE study): fluid challenge versus passive leg raising in high-risk surgical patients
    M Cecconi
    F Caliandro
    J Mellinghoff
    D Dawson
    S Ranjan
    M Hamilton
    M Grounds
    A Rhodes
    Critical Care, 16 (Suppl 1):
  • [34] Effect of Systolic Cardiac Function on Passive Leg Raising for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness: A Prospective Observational Study
    Si, Xiang
    Cao, Dai-Yin
    Chen, Juan
    Wu, Jian-Feng
    Liu, Zi-Meng
    Xu, Hai-Lin
    Chen, Min-Ping
    Liu, Yong-Jun
    Guan, Xiang-Dong
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 131 (03) : 253 - +
  • [35] Using Transthoracic Echocardiography to Predict Fluid Responsiveness after Passive Leg Raising Test: Caution Needed
    Prabu, Natesh R.
    Kothekar, Amol T.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 24 (11) : 1147 - 1148
  • [36] Effect of Systolic Cardiac Function on Passive Leg Raising for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness: A Prospective Observational Study
    Si Xiang
    Cao Dai-Yin
    Chen Juan
    Wu Jian-Feng
    Liu Zi-Meng
    Xu Hai-Lin
    Chen Min-Ying
    Liu Yong-Jun
    Guan Xiang-Dong
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2018, 131 (03) : 253 - 261
  • [37] Ultrasound stroke volume variation induced by passive leg raising and fluid responsiveness: An observational cohort study
    Trifi, A.
    Abdellatif, S.
    Daly, F.
    Nasri, R.
    Touitu, Y.
    Ben Lakhal, S.
    MEDICINA INTENSIVA, 2019, 43 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [38] Passive leg raising test using the carotid flow velocity–time integral to predict fluid responsiveness
    Issac Cheong
    Victoria Otero Castro
    Fernando Ariel Sosa
    Bárbara Tort Oribe
    María Florencia Früchtenicht
    Francisco Marcelo Tamagnone
    Pablo Martín Merlo
    Journal of Ultrasound, 2024, 27 : 97 - 104
  • [39] Passive leg raising: five rules, not a drop of fluid!
    Monnet, Xavier
    Teboul, Jean-Louis
    CRITICAL CARE, 2015, 19
  • [40] Passive leg raising: five rules, not a drop of fluid!
    Xavier Monnet
    Jean-Louis Teboul
    Critical Care, 19