Clinical performance feedback and quality improvement opportunities for perioperative physicians

被引:28
|
作者
Kaye, Alan David [1 ]
Okanlawon, Olutoyin J. [2 ]
Urman, Richard D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, New Orleans, LA USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
physician education; outcomes measurement; performance improvement; anesthesiology;
D O I
10.2147/AMEP.S62165
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Clinical performance feedback is an important component of the ongoing development and education of health care practitioners. For physicians, feedback about their clinical practice and outcomes is central to developing both confidence and competence at all stages of their medical careers. Cultural and financial infrastructures need to be in place, and the concept of feedback needs to be readily embraced and encouraged by clinical leadership and other stakeholders. The "buy-in" includes the expectation and view that feedback occurs on a routine basis, and those engaged in the process are both encouraged to participate and held accountable. Feedback must be part of an overarching quality improvement and physician education agenda; it is not meant to be an isolated, fragmented initiative that is typically undermined by lack of resources or systemic barriers to gaining improvement within programs. Effective feedback should be an integral part of clinical practice. Anesthesiologists and other perioperative physicians are identifying specialty-specific indicators that can be used when creating a broader quality improvement agenda. Placing a more immediate formal feedback strategy that focuses on goal-oriented behavior is rapidly becoming a mainstay. Physicians may use their individual feedback reports for reflection and designing personal development plans as lifelong learners and leaders in improving patient care.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 123
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Quality Improvement Initiative to Optimize Perioperative Clinical Outcomes for Patients Labelled Penicillin Allergic
    Bauer, Maureen
    Lin, Taylor
    Foley, Carolyn
    Gilje, Elizabeth
    Thomas, James
    Fernandez, Patrick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 151 (02) : AB40 - AB40
  • [32] CLINICAL GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT - OPPORTUNITIES FOR FAMILY PHYSICIANS
    JACKSON, MN
    NUTTING, PA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 1991, 33 (02): : 129 - &
  • [33] Patient Satisfaction: Opportunities for Quality Improvement
    Kadom, Nadja
    Nagy, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 11 (08) : 830 - 831
  • [34] Opportunities in Healthcare Quality Improvement: An Introduction
    Hussain, Sarwat
    [J]. ANNALS OF KING EDWARD MEDICAL UNIVERSITY LAHORE PAKISTAN, 2019, 25 : 251 - 256
  • [35] The Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme: improving outcomes
    Gilhooly, D.
    Moonesinghe, S. R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2018, 79 (02) : 117 - 117
  • [36] An introductory guide to quality improvement in perioperative medicine
    Yusuke Mazda
    Kazuyoshi Aoyama
    [J]. Journal of Anesthesia, 2021, 35 : 606 - 610
  • [37] Prioritizing Perioperative Quality Improvement in Orthopaedic Surgery
    Schilling, Peter L.
    Hallstrom, Brian R.
    Birkmeyer, John D.
    Carpenter, James E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (09): : 1884 - 1889
  • [38] An introductory guide to quality improvement in perioperative medicine
    Mazda, Yusuke
    Aoyama, Kazuyoshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2021, 35 (05) : 606 - 610
  • [39] Quality improvement in perioperative medicine: driving the revolution
    Wilson, Matthew
    Walker, David
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2017, 78 (11) : 638 - 641
  • [40] Quality improvement in clinical teaching through student evaluations of rotations and feedback to departments
    Lewisson, Niclas
    Hellgren, Laila
    Johansson, Jakob
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2013, 35 (10) : 820 - 825