The Measurement of Intraocular Pressure in Eyes with Keratoconus Using Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometer

被引:0
|
作者
Ocakoglu, Ozcan [1 ]
Iskeleli, Guzin [1 ]
Ucar, Didar [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Cerrahpafla Tip Fak, Goz Hastaliklari Ana Bilim Dali, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Keratoconus; Pascal dynamic contour tonometry; central corneal thickness;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) with other tonometric systems for measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes with keratoconus which has thinned cornea and topographically indicated keratoconus pattern and to investigate whether central corneal thickness (CCT) affect IOP measurements or not. Material and Method: Our study included 44 eyes of 28 patients which were diagnosed as keratoconus clinically and topographically. Their central corneal thicknesses which were measured with ultrasonographic pachymeter were under 500 microns (mu). IOP's were estimated using Pascal DCT, Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and non contact air-puff tonometer (NCT). The "mean" IOP accepted as the mean of three consecutive measurements in different times. The "mean" IOP's values using Pascal DCT, GAT and NCT compared with paired student t test with each other. Statistically significance limit was p< 0,05. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the effect of CCT on IOP. Correlation coefficient was accepted r> 0,25 (p< 0,05). Results: The mean age of 28 patients with keratoconus was 30,18 +/- 8.8 years. In 44 study eyes, the mean value of CCT's was 465,8 +/- 24,1 mu. The mean values of IOP's using Pascal DCT, GAT and NCT were 14,3 +/- 2,3 mmHg, 11,1 +/- 2,6 mmHg, 8,11 +/- 1,9 mmHg, respectively. The mean IOP using Pascal DCT was statistically higher than the mean values of GAT and NCT (Student t test; p< 0,05). IOP measured with NCT were significantly correlated with CCT (Pearson correlation analysis r1= 0,26, p< 0,05) but IOP measured with GAT and Pascal DCT were not effected (for GAT r(2)= 0,09; for DKT r3= 0,06, p> 0,05). Conclusion: In eyes with keratoconus, the highest IOP value was measured with Pascal DCT. The measured IOP's using NCT was affected by the changes in CCT but the IOP's measured with Pascal DCT and GAT were not. When the technical problems with using GAT in eyes with keratoconus which was thinned and topographically distrurbed cornea are considered, we thought that to use Pascal DCT is more accurate and safely.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 190
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma
    Morita, Tetsuya
    Shoji, Nobuyuki
    Kamiya, Kazutaka
    Hagishima, Mana
    Fujimura, Fusako
    Shimizu, Kimiya
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 248 (01) : 73 - 77
  • [22] Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma
    Morita, Tetsuya
    Shoji, Nobuyuki
    Kamiya, Kazutaka
    Hagishima, Mana
    Fujimura, Fusako
    Shimizu, Kimiya
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 248 (04) : 609 - 610
  • [23] Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma
    Tetsuya Morita
    Nobuyuki Shoji
    Kazutaka Kamiya
    Mana Hagishima
    Fusako Fujimura
    Kimiya Shimizu
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2010, 248 : 609 - 610
  • [24] Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma
    Tetsuya Morita
    Nobuyuki Shoji
    Kazutaka Kamiya
    Mana Hagishima
    Fusako Fujimura
    Kimiya Shimizu
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2010, 248 : 73 - 77
  • [25] Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Ku, JYF
    Danesh-Meyer, HV
    Craig, JP
    Gamble, GD
    McGhee, CNJ
    EYE, 2006, 20 (02) : 191 - 198
  • [26] Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    J Y F Ku
    H V Danesh-Meyer
    J P Craig
    G D Gamble
    C N J McGhee
    Eye, 2006, 20 : 191 - 198
  • [27] Comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometer and dynamic contour tonometer in normal and glaucomatous eyes
    Ceruti, P
    Morbio, R
    Marraffa, M
    Marchini, G
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46
  • [28] Measurement of intraocular pressure with a modern noncontact tonometer
    Koçak, I
    Orgül, S
    Saruhan, A
    Haefliger, I
    Hendrickson, P
    Flammer, J
    OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1998, 212 (02) : 81 - 87
  • [29] Measurement of Intraocular Pressure after LASIK by Dynamic Contour Tonometry
    刘磊
    雷澄
    李新宇
    董洁玉
    华中科技大学学报(医学英德文版), 2006, (03) : 372 - 373
  • [30] Measurement of intraocular pressure after LASIK by dynamic contour tonometry
    Liu Lei
    Lei Cheng
    Li Xinyu
    Dong Jieyu
    Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences], 2006, 26 (3): : 372 - 373