The role of hemifield sector analysis in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry in the early detection of glaucomatous visual field defects

被引:4
|
作者
Mousa, Mohammad F. [1 ]
Cubbidge, Robert P. [2 ]
Al-Mansouri, Fatima [1 ]
Bener, Abdulbari [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Med Corp, Dept Ophthalmol, Doha, Qatar
[2] Aston Univ, Sch Life & Hlth Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Hamad Med Corp, Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Publ Hlth, Dept Med Stat & Epidemiol, Doha, Qatar
[4] Univ Manchester, Sch Epidemiol & Hlth Sci, Dept Evidence Populat Hlth Unit, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2013年 / 7卷
关键词
objective perimetry; multifocal VEP; visual field testing; glaucomatous field loss; glaucoma suspect; SAP; HFA;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S44009
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a new analysis method of mfVEP objective perimetry in the early detection of glaucomatous visual field defects compared to the gold standard technique. Methods and patients: Three groups were tested in this study; normal controls (38 eyes), glaucoma patients (36 eyes), and glaucoma suspect patients (38 eyes). All subjects underwent two standard 24-2 visual field tests: one with the Humphrey Field Analyzer and a single mfVEP test in one session. Analysis of the mfVEP results was carried out using the new analysis protocol: the hemifield sector analysis protocol. Results: Analysis of the mfVEP showed that the signal to noise ratio (SNR) difference between superior and inferior hemifields was statistically significant between the three groups (analysis of variance, P < 0.001 with a 95% confidence interval, 2.82, 2.89 for normal group; 2.25, 2.29 for glaucoma suspect group; 1.67, 1.73 for glaucoma group). The difference between superior and inferior hemifield sectors and hemi-rings was statistically significant in 11/11 pair of sectors and hemi-rings in the glaucoma patients group (t-test P < 0.001), statistically significant in 5/11 pairs of sectors and hemi-rings in the glaucoma suspect group (t-test P < 0.01), and only 1/11 pair was statistically significant (t-test P < 0.9). The sensitivity and specificity of the hemifield sector analysis protocol in detecting glaucoma was 97% and 86% respectively and 89% and 79% in glaucoma suspects. These results showed that the new analysis protocol was able to confirm existing visual field defects detected by standard perimetry, was able to differentiate between the three study groups with a clear distinction between normal patients and those with suspected glaucoma, and was able to detect early visual field changes not detected by standard perimetry. In addition, the distinction between normal and glaucoma patients was especially clear and significant using this analysis. Conclusion: The new hemifield sector analysis protocol used in mfVEP testing can be used to detect glaucomatous visual field defects in both glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients. Using this protocol, it can provide information about focal visual field differences across the horizontal midline, which can be utilized to differentiate between glaucoma and normal subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of the mfVEP test showed very promising results and correlated with other anatomical changes in glaucomatous visual field loss. The intersector analysis protocol can detect early field changes not detected by the standard Humphrey Field Analyzer test.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 857
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of multifocal visual evoked potential tests in the objective evaluation of the visual field in pediatric epilepsy surgery
    Kim, YJ
    Yukawa, E
    Kawasaki, K
    Nakase, H
    Sakaki, T
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2006, 104 (03) : 160 - 165
  • [32] Objective evaluation of the visual field in pediatric epilepsy surgery using the multifocal visual evoked potential.
    Kim, YJ
    Yukawa, E
    Nakase, H
    Sakaki, T
    EPILEPSIA, 2005, 46 : 23 - 23
  • [33] Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials (mfVEP) for the Detection of Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Haitao
    Liao, Fei
    Blanco, Roman
    de la Villa, Pedro
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (18)
  • [34] Objective assessment of visual field defects by multifocal ERG
    Kretschmann, U
    Gendo, K
    Wilhelm, H
    Schiefer, U
    Hettesheimer, H
    Zrenner, E
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 1998, 212 (01) : 40 - 49
  • [35] The use of hemifield analysis to detect change in glaucomatous visual field loss
    Henson, DB
    Wishart, PK
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1997, 38 (04) : 2646 - 2646
  • [36] Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials - Evidence of a linear relationship
    Hood, DC
    Greenstein, VC
    Odel, JG
    Zhang, X
    Ritch, R
    Liebmann, JM
    Hong, JE
    Chen, CS
    Thienprasiddhi, P
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 120 (12) : 1672 - 1681
  • [37] COMPUTER PERIMETRY OF GLAUCOMATOUS VISUAL-FIELD DEFECTS AT DIFFERENT STIMULUS SIZES
    GRAMER, E
    KONTIC, D
    KRIEGLSTEIN, GK
    OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1981, 183 (03) : 162 - 167
  • [38] EFFECTIVENESS OF UNSUPERVISED OCULOKINETIC PERIMETRY FOR DETECTING GLAUCOMATOUS VISUAL-FIELD DEFECTS
    HARPER, RA
    HILL, AR
    REEVES, BC
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1994, 14 (02) : 199 - 202
  • [39] Comparing multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) and multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP) in retinal diseases
    Faran Sabeti
    Andrew C. James
    Corinne F. Carle
    Rohan W. Essex
    Andrew Bell
    Ted Maddess
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [40] Comparing multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) and multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP) in retinal diseases
    Sabeti, Faran
    James, Andrew C.
    Carle, Corinne F.
    Essex, Rohan W.
    Bell, Andrew
    Maddess, Ted
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7