The role of hemifield sector analysis in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry in the early detection of glaucomatous visual field defects

被引:4
|
作者
Mousa, Mohammad F. [1 ]
Cubbidge, Robert P. [2 ]
Al-Mansouri, Fatima [1 ]
Bener, Abdulbari [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Med Corp, Dept Ophthalmol, Doha, Qatar
[2] Aston Univ, Sch Life & Hlth Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Hamad Med Corp, Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Publ Hlth, Dept Med Stat & Epidemiol, Doha, Qatar
[4] Univ Manchester, Sch Epidemiol & Hlth Sci, Dept Evidence Populat Hlth Unit, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2013年 / 7卷
关键词
objective perimetry; multifocal VEP; visual field testing; glaucomatous field loss; glaucoma suspect; SAP; HFA;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S44009
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a new analysis method of mfVEP objective perimetry in the early detection of glaucomatous visual field defects compared to the gold standard technique. Methods and patients: Three groups were tested in this study; normal controls (38 eyes), glaucoma patients (36 eyes), and glaucoma suspect patients (38 eyes). All subjects underwent two standard 24-2 visual field tests: one with the Humphrey Field Analyzer and a single mfVEP test in one session. Analysis of the mfVEP results was carried out using the new analysis protocol: the hemifield sector analysis protocol. Results: Analysis of the mfVEP showed that the signal to noise ratio (SNR) difference between superior and inferior hemifields was statistically significant between the three groups (analysis of variance, P < 0.001 with a 95% confidence interval, 2.82, 2.89 for normal group; 2.25, 2.29 for glaucoma suspect group; 1.67, 1.73 for glaucoma group). The difference between superior and inferior hemifield sectors and hemi-rings was statistically significant in 11/11 pair of sectors and hemi-rings in the glaucoma patients group (t-test P < 0.001), statistically significant in 5/11 pairs of sectors and hemi-rings in the glaucoma suspect group (t-test P < 0.01), and only 1/11 pair was statistically significant (t-test P < 0.9). The sensitivity and specificity of the hemifield sector analysis protocol in detecting glaucoma was 97% and 86% respectively and 89% and 79% in glaucoma suspects. These results showed that the new analysis protocol was able to confirm existing visual field defects detected by standard perimetry, was able to differentiate between the three study groups with a clear distinction between normal patients and those with suspected glaucoma, and was able to detect early visual field changes not detected by standard perimetry. In addition, the distinction between normal and glaucoma patients was especially clear and significant using this analysis. Conclusion: The new hemifield sector analysis protocol used in mfVEP testing can be used to detect glaucomatous visual field defects in both glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients. Using this protocol, it can provide information about focal visual field differences across the horizontal midline, which can be utilized to differentiate between glaucoma and normal subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of the mfVEP test showed very promising results and correlated with other anatomical changes in glaucomatous visual field loss. The intersector analysis protocol can detect early field changes not detected by the standard Humphrey Field Analyzer test.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 857
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Association of Optic Disc Configuration and Clustered Visual Field Sensitivity in Glaucomatous Eyes With Hemifield Visual Field Defects
    Nagai-Kusuhara, Azusa
    Nakamura, Makoto
    Kanamori, Akiyasu
    Negi, Akira
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2009, 18 (01) : 62 - 68
  • [22] GDx RNFL measures in eyes with glaucomatous hemifield visual field defects.
    Gokhale, PA
    Bowd, C
    Zangwill, LM
    Sample, PA
    Weinreb, RN
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S92 - S92
  • [23] Effect of pupil size on objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials
    Martins, A
    Balachandran, C
    Klistorner, A
    Graham, SL
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 : U446 - U446
  • [24] OCULOKINETIC PERIMETRY COMPARED WITH HUMPHREY VISUAL-FIELD ANALYSIS IN THE DETECTION OF GLAUCOMATOUS VISUAL-FIELD LOSS
    WISHART, PK
    EYE, 1993, 7 : 113 - 121
  • [25] Classifying patterns of localized glaucomatous visual field defects on automated perimetry
    Sihota, Ramanjit
    Gupta, Viney
    Tuli, Deven
    Sharma, Ajay
    Sony, Parul
    Srinivasan, Geetha
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2007, 16 (01) : 146 - 152
  • [26] Multifocal visual evoked potential and automated perimetry abnormalities in strabismic amblyopes
    Greenstein, Vivienne C.
    Eggers, Howard M.
    Hood, Donald C.
    JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2008, 12 (01): : 11 - 17
  • [27] Repeat reliability of the multifocal visual evoked potential in normal and glaucomatous eyes
    Chen, CS
    Hood, DC
    Zhang, X
    Karam, EZ
    Liebmann, JM
    Thienprasiddhi, P
    Ritch, R
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2002, 43 : U489 - U489
  • [28] Investigating the effects of glaucomatous damage on the multifocal visual evoked potential parameters
    Danyaei, Amir
    Kasiri, Ali
    Latifi, Seyed Mahmoud
    Armiun, Parvin
    Tahmasebi, Mohammad Javad
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 39 (12) : 2897 - 2904
  • [29] Investigating the effects of glaucomatous damage on the multifocal visual evoked potential parameters
    Amir Danyaei
    Ali Kasiri
    Seyed Mahmoud Latifi
    Parvin Armiun
    Mohammad Javad Tahmasebi
    International Ophthalmology, 2019, 39 : 2897 - 2904
  • [30] Repeat reliability of the multifocal visual evoked potential in normal and glaucomatous eyes
    Chen, CS
    Hood, DC
    Zhang, X
    Karan, EZ
    Liebmann, JM
    Ritch, R
    Thienprasiddhi, P
    Greenstein, VC
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2003, 12 (05) : 399 - 408