The role of hemifield sector analysis in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry in the early detection of glaucomatous visual field defects

被引:4
|
作者
Mousa, Mohammad F. [1 ]
Cubbidge, Robert P. [2 ]
Al-Mansouri, Fatima [1 ]
Bener, Abdulbari [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Med Corp, Dept Ophthalmol, Doha, Qatar
[2] Aston Univ, Sch Life & Hlth Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Hamad Med Corp, Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Publ Hlth, Dept Med Stat & Epidemiol, Doha, Qatar
[4] Univ Manchester, Sch Epidemiol & Hlth Sci, Dept Evidence Populat Hlth Unit, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2013年 / 7卷
关键词
objective perimetry; multifocal VEP; visual field testing; glaucomatous field loss; glaucoma suspect; SAP; HFA;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S44009
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a new analysis method of mfVEP objective perimetry in the early detection of glaucomatous visual field defects compared to the gold standard technique. Methods and patients: Three groups were tested in this study; normal controls (38 eyes), glaucoma patients (36 eyes), and glaucoma suspect patients (38 eyes). All subjects underwent two standard 24-2 visual field tests: one with the Humphrey Field Analyzer and a single mfVEP test in one session. Analysis of the mfVEP results was carried out using the new analysis protocol: the hemifield sector analysis protocol. Results: Analysis of the mfVEP showed that the signal to noise ratio (SNR) difference between superior and inferior hemifields was statistically significant between the three groups (analysis of variance, P < 0.001 with a 95% confidence interval, 2.82, 2.89 for normal group; 2.25, 2.29 for glaucoma suspect group; 1.67, 1.73 for glaucoma group). The difference between superior and inferior hemifield sectors and hemi-rings was statistically significant in 11/11 pair of sectors and hemi-rings in the glaucoma patients group (t-test P < 0.001), statistically significant in 5/11 pairs of sectors and hemi-rings in the glaucoma suspect group (t-test P < 0.01), and only 1/11 pair was statistically significant (t-test P < 0.9). The sensitivity and specificity of the hemifield sector analysis protocol in detecting glaucoma was 97% and 86% respectively and 89% and 79% in glaucoma suspects. These results showed that the new analysis protocol was able to confirm existing visual field defects detected by standard perimetry, was able to differentiate between the three study groups with a clear distinction between normal patients and those with suspected glaucoma, and was able to detect early visual field changes not detected by standard perimetry. In addition, the distinction between normal and glaucoma patients was especially clear and significant using this analysis. Conclusion: The new hemifield sector analysis protocol used in mfVEP testing can be used to detect glaucomatous visual field defects in both glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients. Using this protocol, it can provide information about focal visual field differences across the horizontal midline, which can be utilized to differentiate between glaucoma and normal subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of the mfVEP test showed very promising results and correlated with other anatomical changes in glaucomatous visual field loss. The intersector analysis protocol can detect early field changes not detected by the standard Humphrey Field Analyzer test.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 857
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The benefit of combining standard automated perimetry and multifocal visual evoked potential hemifield intersector analysis in suspecious glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Mousa, Mohamed F.
    Cubbidge, Robert P.
    Al-Mansouri, Fatima
    Bener, Abdulbari
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 2013, 24 (03): : 277 - 288
  • [2] Detection of glaucomatous visual field loss using multifocal visual evoked potential
    Fortune, B
    Goh, K
    Demirel, S
    Novitsky, K
    Mansberger, SL
    Johnson, CA
    Cioff, GA
    PERIMETRY UPDATE 2002/2003, 2004, : 251 - 260
  • [3] Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: Improving objective detection of local visual field defects
    Klistorner, AI
    Graham, SL
    Grigg, JR
    Billson, FA
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1998, 39 (06) : 937 - 950
  • [4] Objective detection of hemifield and quadrantic field defects by visual evoked cortical potentials
    Bradnam, MS
    Montgomery, DMI
    Evans, AL
    Keating, D
    McClure, EA
    Damato, BE
    McFadzean, R
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 80 (04) : 297 - 303
  • [5] Objective perimetry using the multifocal visual evoked potential in central visual pathway lesions
    Klistorner, AI
    Graham, SL
    Grigg, J
    Balachandran, C
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 89 (06) : 739 - 744
  • [6] Multifocal visual evoked potential and electroretinogram glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field defect
    Kondo, Y
    Mochizuki, I
    Kitazawa, Y
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S291 - S291
  • [7] Blue-yellow multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials and the detection of glaucomatous field defects
    Martins, A
    Klistorner, AI
    Graham, SL
    Grigg, J
    Billson, F
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46
  • [8] Comparison of visual evoked potentials, automated perimetry and frequency-doubling perimetry in early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss
    Saric, D
    Mandic, Z
    Ivekovic, R
    Geber, MZ
    Bencic, G
    Tomic, Z
    Grgic, D
    COLLEGIUM ANTROPOLOGICUM, 2005, 29 : 111 - 113
  • [9] Multifocal visual evoked potential responses in glaucoma patients with unilateral hemifield defects
    Thienprasiddhi, P
    Greenstein, VC
    Chen, CS
    Liebmann, JM
    Ritch, R
    Hood, DC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 136 (01) : 34 - 40
  • [10] Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss
    Goldberg, I
    Graham, SL
    Klistorner, AI
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 133 (01) : 29 - 39