COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PALLIATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER

被引:127
|
作者
GLIMELIUS, B
HOFFMAN, K
GRAF, W
HAGLUND, U
NYREN, O
PAHLMAN, L
SJODEN, PO
机构
[1] UNIV UPPSALA, DEPT SURG, S-75185 UPPSALA, SWEDEN
[2] UNIV UPPSALA, CTR CARING SCI, S-75185 UPPSALA, SWEDEN
关键词
CHEMOTHERAPY; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER; PALLIATION;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059157
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Chemotherapy may relieve tumor-related symptoms, may improve quality of life and prolong survival in advanced gastrointestinal cancer. The extent of such improvements is unclear despite the extensive use of this treatment modality, and there are no studies concerning the economic costs involved. The aim of this study was to assess the economic cost of any gain achieved in the quantity and quality of life by chemotherapy. Patients and methods: Between January 1991 and May 1992, 61 patients with inoperable cancer (18 gastric, 22 pancreatic or biliary, and 21 colorectal) were randomized to either primary chemotherapy in addition to best supportive care or to best supportive care. Chemotherapy was allowed in the latter group if the supportive measures did not achieve palliation. All economic costs for medical care were prospectively recorded, and marginal cost-effectiveness analyses were performed. Results: More patients in the primary chemotherapy group (19/33, 58%) had improved/prolonged high quality of life (QoL-patient, minimum duration 4 months) than in the best supportive care group (8/28, 29%, p<0.05). Overall survival and quality-adjusted survival were significantly longer in the primary chemotherapy group (median 9 vs. 4 months, p<0.05), and median 7 vs. 2 months, p<0.05, respectively). When analysed by cancer site, survival was significantly prolonged in gastric cancer patients (median 10 vs. 4 months, p<0.02), but not in colorectal (median 12 vs. 6 months, p=0.1) and pancreatic-biliary cancer patients (median 8 vs. 5 months, p=0.8). The average cost for all medical care was approximately 50% higher in the primary chemotherapy group, but the average cost per day was the same in the two groups. Hospitalization accounted for most of the costs in both groups. The incremental costs per gained year of life was SEK 166,400 ($21,300), per gained quality adjusted year of life SEK 157,200 ($20,200), and per QoL-patient SEK 160,300 ($20,600). These costs were lower for gastric and colorectal cancer patients, and much higher for pancreatic-biliary cancer patients. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that palliative chemotherapy is cost-effective in patients with advanced gastric and colorectal cancer. Knowledge about survival and quality of life benefits is still limited in patients suffering from gastric and pancreatic-biliary cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 274
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Zhu, Youwen
    Liu, Kun
    Ding, Dong
    Zhou, Yangying
    Peng, Libo
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2022, 39 (06) : 2614 - 2629
  • [42] Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Youwen Zhu
    Kun Liu
    Dong Ding
    Yangying Zhou
    Libo Peng
    Advances in Therapy, 2022, 39 : 2614 - 2629
  • [43] New chemotherapy treatments in advanced cancer patients -: An easily applicable evaluation of clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness
    Expósito, J
    Hernández, J
    Feijóo, AF
    Nieto, T
    Briones, E
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2003, 42 (08) : 895 - 902
  • [44] The Cost-Effectiveness of Different Chemotherapy Strategies for Patients with Poor Prognosis Advanced Colorectal Cancer (MRC FOCUS)
    Manca, Andrea
    Asseburg, Christian
    Vergel, Yolanda Bravo
    Seymour, Matt T.
    Meade, Angela
    Stephens, Richard
    Parmar, Mahesh
    Sculpher, Mark J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (01) : 22 - 31
  • [45] Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan versus chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
    Lang, Yitian
    Chai, Qingqing
    Tao, Wenqi
    Liao, Yahui
    Liu, Xiaoyan
    Wu, Bin
    BREAST, 2023, 68 : 173 - 180
  • [46] COST-EFFECTIVENESS IN CANCER
    FITZPATRICK, PJ
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1974, 111 (07) : 652 - 653
  • [47] Pembrolizumab in advanced recurrent endometrial cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Barrington, D. A.
    Dilley, S. E.
    Smith, H. J.
    Straughn, J. M., Jr.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 149 : 23 - 23
  • [48] Cost-effectiveness of androgen suppression strategies in advanced prostate cancer
    Bayoumi, AM
    Brown, AS
    Garber, AM
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (04) : 458 - 458
  • [49] The cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer in Canada
    Duong, M.
    Wright, E.
    Yin, L.
    Martin-Nunez, I.
    Ghatage, P.
    Fung-Kee-Fung, M.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (05) : E461 - E467
  • [50] The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers
    Bajwah, Sabrina
    Oluyase, Adejoke O.
    Yi, Deokhee
    Gao, Wei
    Evans, Catherine J.
    Grande, Gunn
    Todd, Chris
    Costantini, Massimo
    Murtagh, Fliss E.
    Higginson, Irene J.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, (09):