COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PALLIATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER

被引:127
|
作者
GLIMELIUS, B
HOFFMAN, K
GRAF, W
HAGLUND, U
NYREN, O
PAHLMAN, L
SJODEN, PO
机构
[1] UNIV UPPSALA, DEPT SURG, S-75185 UPPSALA, SWEDEN
[2] UNIV UPPSALA, CTR CARING SCI, S-75185 UPPSALA, SWEDEN
关键词
CHEMOTHERAPY; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER; PALLIATION;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059157
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Chemotherapy may relieve tumor-related symptoms, may improve quality of life and prolong survival in advanced gastrointestinal cancer. The extent of such improvements is unclear despite the extensive use of this treatment modality, and there are no studies concerning the economic costs involved. The aim of this study was to assess the economic cost of any gain achieved in the quantity and quality of life by chemotherapy. Patients and methods: Between January 1991 and May 1992, 61 patients with inoperable cancer (18 gastric, 22 pancreatic or biliary, and 21 colorectal) were randomized to either primary chemotherapy in addition to best supportive care or to best supportive care. Chemotherapy was allowed in the latter group if the supportive measures did not achieve palliation. All economic costs for medical care were prospectively recorded, and marginal cost-effectiveness analyses were performed. Results: More patients in the primary chemotherapy group (19/33, 58%) had improved/prolonged high quality of life (QoL-patient, minimum duration 4 months) than in the best supportive care group (8/28, 29%, p<0.05). Overall survival and quality-adjusted survival were significantly longer in the primary chemotherapy group (median 9 vs. 4 months, p<0.05), and median 7 vs. 2 months, p<0.05, respectively). When analysed by cancer site, survival was significantly prolonged in gastric cancer patients (median 10 vs. 4 months, p<0.02), but not in colorectal (median 12 vs. 6 months, p=0.1) and pancreatic-biliary cancer patients (median 8 vs. 5 months, p=0.8). The average cost for all medical care was approximately 50% higher in the primary chemotherapy group, but the average cost per day was the same in the two groups. Hospitalization accounted for most of the costs in both groups. The incremental costs per gained year of life was SEK 166,400 ($21,300), per gained quality adjusted year of life SEK 157,200 ($20,200), and per QoL-patient SEK 160,300 ($20,600). These costs were lower for gastric and colorectal cancer patients, and much higher for pancreatic-biliary cancer patients. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that palliative chemotherapy is cost-effective in patients with advanced gastric and colorectal cancer. Knowledge about survival and quality of life benefits is still limited in patients suffering from gastric and pancreatic-biliary cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 274
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The use, cost, and cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer
    Ramsey, Scott David
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 4 (09) : S211 - S211
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness and safety of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced and recurrent gastric cancer
    Kimura, Michio
    Usami, Eiseki
    Teramachi, Hitomi
    Yoshimura, Tomoaki
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (06) : 403 - 411
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Lin, Shen
    Luo, Shaohong
    Zhong, Lixian
    Lai, Shubin
    Zeng, Dayong
    Rao, Xin
    Huang, Pinfang
    Weng, Xiuhua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2020, 42 (04) : 1175 - 1183
  • [24] Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer
    K. Zhou
    F. Wen
    P. Zhang
    J. Zhou
    H. Chen
    H. Zheng
    Y. Yang
    Q. Li
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2017, 19 : 1117 - 1124
  • [25] Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Shen Lin
    Shaohong Luo
    Lixian Zhong
    Shubin Lai
    Dayong Zeng
    Xin Rao
    Pinfang Huang
    Xiuhua Weng
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2020, 42 : 1175 - 1183
  • [26] Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer
    Zhou, K.
    Wen, F.
    Zhang, P.
    Zhou, J.
    Chen, H.
    Zheng, H.
    Yang, Y.
    Li, Q.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 19 (09): : 1117 - 1124
  • [27] Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Oesophageal Cancer
    Wu, Meiyu
    Qin, Shuxia
    Wang, Liting
    Tan, Chongqing
    Peng, Ye
    Zeng, Xiaohui
    Luo, Xia
    Yi, Lidan
    Wan, Xiaomin
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [28] Cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab with chemotherapy and maintenance durvalumab with or without olaparib for advanced endometrial cancer
    Jiahao Zhang
    Jianying Lei
    Caicong You
    Wu Fu
    Bin Zheng
    Hongfu Cai
    Maobai Liu
    Na Li
    Scientific Reports, 15 (1)
  • [29] Cost-Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy versus Primary Surgery in Elderly Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer
    Poonawalla, Insiya B.
    Lairson, David R.
    Chan, Wenyaw
    Piller, Linda B.
    Du, Xianglin L.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (04) : 387 - 395
  • [30] EFFICACY AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SECOND-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED GASTRIC CANCER
    Zhou, K.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A871 - A871