The connectionism as subsidy for the debate on the paradigm of journalistic objectivity

被引:0
|
作者
Duren, Ricardo Luis [1 ]
Flores, Onici Claro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santa Cruz do Sul UNISC, Santa Cruz Do Sul, Brazil
来源
ANTARES-LETRAS E HUMANIDADES | 2011年 / 3卷 / 06期
关键词
Objectivity; journalism; connectionism; cognitive science; comprehension;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article aims at relying on the connectionism paradigm, which belongs to the Cognitive Sciences range, in order to enlarge the debate about the concept of journalistic objectivity. The article describes that, in the connectionist perspective, external stimuli trigger parallel networks of neurons in the brain of the individual, that influence themselves simultaneously, generating fast responses. Under this paradigm, the same is true in reading, in which the text display triggers various neural networks where information is already stored, coming from experience and learning. Thus, connectionism believes that in the act of reading, the text is reconstructed by the individual under the influence of his/her prior knowledge. From the connectionist view, this article aims at launching new questions around the concept of objectivity, showing that in the act of understanding a text, itself, phenomena that distance the reader or receiver of the full meaning provided by the author of that particular text occur.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 262
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Objectivity as a Symbolic Capital in the Journalistic Field. Contribution to the Analysis of Journalism Discourse
    Ciolkiewicz, Pawel
    STUDIA SOCJOLOGICZNE, 2012, (01): : 225 - 243
  • [42] Indigenous media producers' perspectives on objectivity, balancing community responsibilities and journalistic obligations
    Burrows, Elizabeth
    MEDIA CULTURE & SOCIETY, 2018, 40 (08) : 1117 - 1134
  • [43] Exploring participatory journalistic content: Objectivity and diversity in five examples of participatory journalism
    Borger, Merel
    van Hoof, Anita
    Sanders, Jose
    JOURNALISM, 2019, 20 (03) : 444 - 466
  • [44] Fuelling the fisheries subsidy debate: Agreements, loopholes and implications
    Harper, Sarah
    Bevacqua, Daniele
    Chudnow, Rachel
    Giorgi, Sabrina
    Guillonneau, Victoire
    Le Manach, Frederic
    Sutor, Tim
    Sumaila, Ussif Rashid
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2012, 113 (01) : 143 - 146
  • [45] COMPREHENSION AND EXPLANATION IN THE SCIENCE OF HISTORY, THE DEBATE ON THE PROBLEM OF OBJECTIVITY
    VONDERDUNK, HW
    REVUE BELGE DE PHILOLOGIE ET D HISTOIRE, 1984, 62 (04): : 746 - 758
  • [46] Social Objectivity Under Scrutiny in the Pasteur–Pouchet Debate
    José Antonio López Cerezo
    Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 2015, 46 : 301 - 318
  • [47] THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF SCHUTZ, BERGER AND HABERMAS TO THE DEBATE ON THE OBJECTIVITY OF KNOWLEDGE
    Medina Cambron, Alfons
    Ballano Macias, Sonia
    ANDAMIOS, 2015, 12 (28): : 241 - 264
  • [48] SUBJECTIVITY, OBJECTIVITY, AND INTERSUBJECTIVITY: A New Paradigm for Religion and Science
    Schickel, Joel A.
    PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND CHRISTIAN FAITH, 2011, 63 (01): : 64 - 65
  • [49] Managing the public sphere: Journalistic construction of the great globalization debate
    Bennett, WL
    Pickard, VW
    Iozzi, DP
    Schroeder, CL
    Lagos, T
    Caswell, CE
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2004, 54 (03) : 437 - 455
  • [50] Anti-public and anti-public alternative media and their critique of journalistic objectivity
    Dudova, Michaela
    FILOZOFIA, 2022, 77 (04): : 268 - 282