Proximal Biceps Tenodesis An Anatomic Study and Comparison of the Accuracy of Arthroscopic and Open Techniques Using Interference Screws

被引:8
|
作者
Kovack, Thomas J. [1 ,2 ]
Idoine, John D., III [1 ]
Jacob, Paul B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Doctors Hosp Columbus, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Orthoped Specialists Cent Ohio, Hilliard, OH USA
来源
关键词
shoulder; biceps; tenodesis; tendonitis arthroscopic; open tenodesis;
D O I
10.1177/2325967114522198
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To (1) better define the anatomy of the proximal shoulder in relation to the long head of the biceps tendon, (2) compare the length-tension relationship of the biceps tendon in the native shoulder with that after arthroscopic and open tenodesis techniques using interference screws, and (3) provide surgical recommendations for both procedures based on study findings. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Twenty fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were dissected for analysis. Initial anatomic measurements involving the proximal long head of the biceps tendon (BT) were made, which included: the labral origin to the superior bicipital groove (LO-SBG), the total tendon length (TTL), the musculotendinous junction (MTJ) to the inferior pectoralis major tendon border, the MTJ to the superior pectoralis major tendon border, and the biceps tendon diameter (BTD) at 2 different tenodesis locations. These same measurements were made again after completing a simulated suprapectoral arthroscopic and open subpectoral tenodesis, both with interference screw fixation. Statistical comparisons were then made between the native anatomy and that after tenodesis, with the goal of assessing the accuracy of re-establishing the normal length-tension relationship of the long head of the BT after simulated arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral tenodesis with tenodesis screws. Results: For all cadavers, the mean TTL was 104.1 mm. For the arthroscopic suprapectoral technique, the mean LO-SBG was 33.6 mm, and the mean tendon resection length was 12.8 mm in males and 5.0 mm in females. The mean BTD was 6.35 mm at the arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis site and 5.75 mm at the open subpectoral tenodesis site. Males were found to have statistically longer TTL and LO-SBG measurements (111.6 vs 96.5 mm [P = .027] and 37.2 vs 30.0 mm [P = .009], respectively). In the native shoulder, the mean distances from the MTJ to the superior and inferior borders of the pectoralis major tendon were 23.8 and 31.7 mm, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in the location of the MTJ after simulated arthroscopic or open tenodesis with tenodesis screws as compared with the native shoulder. Mean hole depth in the open subpectoralis tenodesis was 22.4 mm (males) and 18.6 mm (females), with a mean of 20.5 mm for both sexes. Conclusion: This study better defines the anatomy of the proximal shoulder in relationship to the long head of the BT. Using our surgical techniques and recommendations, both arthroscopic and open tenodesis procedures adequately restored the native length-tension relationship of the long head of the biceps. Surgical recommendations are as follows: For arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis with tenodesis screws, the anatomic landmark of the SBG should be used. The tendon resection length should be approximately 1 cm in males and 5 mm in females when using a 25-mm tunnel. For subpectoral tenodesis, the site of tenodesis should be placed approximately 3 cm above the inferior border of the pectoralis major tendon in the bicipital groove; whipstitching and preserving approximately 2 cm of the biceps tendon above the MTJ is also recommended. The diameter of the screws in either location should be based on patient anatomy. However, this study shows the need for slightly longer screws for the subpectoral tenodesis, as the average hole depth was 20.5 mm. The system used in this study has 7 x 10-mm and 8 x 12-mm screws available. Based on study findings, a screw length of 15 to 18 mm may be needed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Radiostereometric Analysis of Tendon Migration After Arthroscopic and Mini-Open Biceps Tenodesis: Interference Screw Versus Single Suture Anchor Fixation
    Forsythe, Brian
    Patel, Harsh H.
    Berlinberg, Elyse J.
    Forlenza, Enrico M.
    Okoroha, Kelechi R.
    Williams, Brady T.
    Yanke, Adam B.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (11): : 2869 - 2880
  • [32] An Anatomic Study of the Proximal Tibial Epiphysis With Relevance to Percutaneous Epiphysiodesis Using Transphyseal Screws (PETS)
    Do, Michael T.
    McCarthy, Conor F.
    Cooperman, Daniel R.
    Liu, Raymond W.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 42 (09) : E932 - E936
  • [33] Accuracy of pedicle screw placement for lumbar fusion using anatomic landmarks versus open laminectomy: A comparison of two surgical techniques in cadaveric specimens
    Karim, Aftab
    Mukherjee, Debi
    Gonzalez-Cruz, Jorge
    Ogden, Alan
    Smith, Donald
    Nanda, Anil
    NEUROSURGERY, 2006, 59 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [34] Arthroskopische und offene Techniken der Tenodese der langen BizepssehneEine biomechanische UntersuchungArthroscopic and open techniques of long biceps tendon tenodesis – a biomechanical study
    M Kusma
    M. Dienst
    J. Eckert
    O. Lorbach
    D. Kohn
    Obere Extremität, 2007, 2 (3) : 124 - 129
  • [35] Comparison of Coracoid Graft Position and Fixation in the Open Versus Arthroscopic Latarjet Techniques: A Cadaveric Study
    Minuesa-Asensio, Alvaro
    Garcia-Esteo, Francisco
    Merida-Velasco, Jose Ramon
    Barrio-Asensio, Carmen
    Lopez-Fernandez, Pedro
    Aramberri-Gutierrez, Mikel
    Murillo-Gonzalez, Jorge
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (09): : 2105 - 2114
  • [36] Accuracy of pedicle screw placement for lumbar fusion using anatomic landmarks versus open laminectomy: A comparison of two surgical techniques in cadaveric specimens - Comments
    Sonntag, Volker K. H.
    Baldwin, Nevan G.
    Traynelis, Vincent C.
    Heary, Robert F.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2006, 59 (01) : 19 - 19
  • [37] Tibial tunnel placement in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison study of outcomes between patient-specific drill template versus conventional arthroscopic techniques
    Zhu, Meisong
    Li, Sijing
    Su, Zexin
    Zhou, Xiaoqi
    Peng, Peng
    Li, Jianyi
    Wang, Jinping
    Lin, Lijun
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2018, 138 (04) : 515 - 525
  • [38] Tibial tunnel placement in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison study of outcomes between patient-specific drill template versus conventional arthroscopic techniques
    Meisong Zhu
    Sijing Li
    Zexin Su
    Xiaoqi Zhou
    Peng Peng
    Jianyi Li
    Jinping Wang
    Lijun Lin
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2018, 138 : 515 - 525
  • [39] Comparison of Accuracy of Bracket Placement by Direct and Indirect Bonding Techniques using Digital Processing - An In-vitro Study
    Kalra, Ravneet K.
    Mittal, Sanjay
    Gandikota, Chandrashekhar
    Sehgal, Vikas
    Gupta, Rajiv
    Bali, Zarina
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2018, 12 (09) : ZC7 - ZC11
  • [40] Comparison of a double bundle arthroscopic inlay and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using clinically relevant tools: A cadaveric study
    Zehms, Chad T.
    Whiddon, David R.
    Miller, Mark D.
    Quinby, J. Scott
    Montgomery, Scott L.
    Campbell, R. Brick
    Sekiya, Jon K.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2008, 24 (04): : 472 - 480