Proximal Biceps Tenodesis An Anatomic Study and Comparison of the Accuracy of Arthroscopic and Open Techniques Using Interference Screws

被引:8
|
作者
Kovack, Thomas J. [1 ,2 ]
Idoine, John D., III [1 ]
Jacob, Paul B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Doctors Hosp Columbus, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Orthoped Specialists Cent Ohio, Hilliard, OH USA
来源
关键词
shoulder; biceps; tenodesis; tendonitis arthroscopic; open tenodesis;
D O I
10.1177/2325967114522198
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To (1) better define the anatomy of the proximal shoulder in relation to the long head of the biceps tendon, (2) compare the length-tension relationship of the biceps tendon in the native shoulder with that after arthroscopic and open tenodesis techniques using interference screws, and (3) provide surgical recommendations for both procedures based on study findings. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Twenty fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were dissected for analysis. Initial anatomic measurements involving the proximal long head of the biceps tendon (BT) were made, which included: the labral origin to the superior bicipital groove (LO-SBG), the total tendon length (TTL), the musculotendinous junction (MTJ) to the inferior pectoralis major tendon border, the MTJ to the superior pectoralis major tendon border, and the biceps tendon diameter (BTD) at 2 different tenodesis locations. These same measurements were made again after completing a simulated suprapectoral arthroscopic and open subpectoral tenodesis, both with interference screw fixation. Statistical comparisons were then made between the native anatomy and that after tenodesis, with the goal of assessing the accuracy of re-establishing the normal length-tension relationship of the long head of the BT after simulated arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral tenodesis with tenodesis screws. Results: For all cadavers, the mean TTL was 104.1 mm. For the arthroscopic suprapectoral technique, the mean LO-SBG was 33.6 mm, and the mean tendon resection length was 12.8 mm in males and 5.0 mm in females. The mean BTD was 6.35 mm at the arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis site and 5.75 mm at the open subpectoral tenodesis site. Males were found to have statistically longer TTL and LO-SBG measurements (111.6 vs 96.5 mm [P = .027] and 37.2 vs 30.0 mm [P = .009], respectively). In the native shoulder, the mean distances from the MTJ to the superior and inferior borders of the pectoralis major tendon were 23.8 and 31.7 mm, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in the location of the MTJ after simulated arthroscopic or open tenodesis with tenodesis screws as compared with the native shoulder. Mean hole depth in the open subpectoralis tenodesis was 22.4 mm (males) and 18.6 mm (females), with a mean of 20.5 mm for both sexes. Conclusion: This study better defines the anatomy of the proximal shoulder in relationship to the long head of the BT. Using our surgical techniques and recommendations, both arthroscopic and open tenodesis procedures adequately restored the native length-tension relationship of the long head of the biceps. Surgical recommendations are as follows: For arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis with tenodesis screws, the anatomic landmark of the SBG should be used. The tendon resection length should be approximately 1 cm in males and 5 mm in females when using a 25-mm tunnel. For subpectoral tenodesis, the site of tenodesis should be placed approximately 3 cm above the inferior border of the pectoralis major tendon in the bicipital groove; whipstitching and preserving approximately 2 cm of the biceps tendon above the MTJ is also recommended. The diameter of the screws in either location should be based on patient anatomy. However, this study shows the need for slightly longer screws for the subpectoral tenodesis, as the average hole depth was 20.5 mm. The system used in this study has 7 x 10-mm and 8 x 12-mm screws available. Based on study findings, a screw length of 15 to 18 mm may be needed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Arthroscopic Suprapectoral and Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis A Comparison of Minimum 2-Year Clinical Outcomes
    Werner, Brian C.
    Evans, Cody L.
    Holzgrefe, Russel E.
    Tuman, Jeffrey M.
    Hart, Joseph M.
    Carson, Eric W.
    Diduch, David R.
    Miller, Mark D.
    Brockmeier, Stephen F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (11): : 2583 - 2590
  • [22] Arthroscopic Versus Open Comparison of Long Head of Biceps Tendon Visualization and Pathology in Patients Requiring Tenodesis
    Gilmer, Brian B.
    DeMers, Ariana M.
    Guerrero, Dolores
    Reid, John B., III
    Lubowitz, James H.
    Guttmann, Dan
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (01): : 29 - 34
  • [23] A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Interference Screw and Suture Anchor Techniques for Biceps Tenodesis
    Park, Ji Soon
    Kim, Sae Hoon
    Jung, Ho Jin
    Lee, Ye Hyun
    Oh, Joo Han
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (02): : 440 - 448
  • [24] A biomechanical comparison of two arthroscopic suture techniques in biceps tenodesis: whip-stitch vs. simple suture techniques
    Agarwalla, Avinesh
    Puzzitiello, Richard N.
    Leong, Natalie L.
    Shewman, Elizabeth F.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    Forsythe, Brian
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (08) : 1531 - 1536
  • [25] Interference Screw Versus Suture Anchor Fixation for Subpectoral Tenodesis of the Proximal Biceps Tendon: A Cadaveric Study
    Golish, S. Raymond
    Caldwell, Paul E.
    Miller, Mark D.
    Singanamala, Naveen
    Ranawat, Anil S.
    Treme, Gehron
    Pearson, Sara E.
    Costic, Ryan
    Sekiya, Jon K.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2008, 24 (10): : 1103 - 1108
  • [26] Biceps tenodesis (long head): arthroscopic keyhole technique versus arthroscopic interference screw: a prospective comparative clinical and radiographic marker study
    Kany J.
    Guinand R.
    Croutzet P.
    Amaravathi R.
    Sekaran P.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2016, 26 (1) : 77 - 84
  • [27] Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using press-fit bony plug: a case series study
    Gad, Ahmed Mahmoud
    Zawam, Sherif Hamdy
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 48 (3) : 785 - 792
  • [28] Biomechanical comparison of the three techniques for arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: implant-free intraosseous tendon fixation with Cobra Guide, interference screw and suture anchor
    Poberaj B.
    Marjanovič B.
    Zupančič M.
    Nabergoj M.
    Cvetko E.
    Balažic M.
    Senekovič V.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2020, 104 (1) : 49 - 57
  • [29] Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using press-fit bony plug: a case series study
    Ahmed Mahmoud Gad
    Sherif Hamdy Zawam
    International Orthopaedics, 2024, 48 : 785 - 792
  • [30] Small-incision open distal subpectoral vs. arthroscopic proximal biceps tenodesis for biceps long head tendon lesions with repair of rotator cuff tears
    Yi, Gang
    Yang, Jing
    Zhang, Lei
    Liu, Yang
    Guo, Xiaoguang
    Fu, Shijie
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2020, 19 (02) : 861 - 870