Comparison of different methods for normal stress calculation during pipe jacking/microtunneling

被引:3
|
作者
Khondoker, Md. Tareq Hossain [1 ]
Yi, Yaolin [1 ]
Bayat, Alireza [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
Pipe jacking; Microtunneling; Normal stress; Arching factor;
D O I
10.1080/19386362.2016.1147193
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Vertical earth load on pipes is an important factor during pipe jacking/microtunneling as it largely affects the jacking force. Although several methods can determine the normal load, the difference among them in calculating vertical normal stress is quite large. Hence, this paper provides an extensive analysis of nine different models/standards and their variations based on experimental data as well as a parametric study. The results show that some models predicted normal stress values close to the measured value, while others give much higher or lower values than the measurement. This discrepancy is due to the variation of assumptions of different methods. To identify the influence of parameters on normal stress, a parametric study is also conducted to reveal the effect of different parameters on arching factor as well as normal earth stress.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 376
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Several Different Methods of in situ stress determination
    Maleki, Shahoo
    Moradzadeh, Ali
    Riabi, Reza Ghavami
    Sadaghzadeh, Farhad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2014, 71 : 395 - 404
  • [32] Comparison of Stress Concentration Factors Obtained by Different Methods
    Sivak, Peter
    Delyova, Ingrid
    Bocko, Jozef
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (24):
  • [33] BONE STRESS IN THE HORSE FORELIMB DURING LOCOMOTION AT DIFFERENT GAITS - A COMPARISON OF 2 EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
    BIEWENER, AA
    THOMASON, J
    GOODSHIP, A
    LANYON, LE
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1983, 16 (08) : 565 - 576
  • [34] EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF DIFFERENT CALCULATION METHODS BY HDM RESIDUAL STRESS MEASUREMENTS
    Casavola, Caterina
    Pappalettera, Giovanni
    Pappalettere, Carmine
    Tursi, Francesca
    ICEM15: 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, 2012,
  • [35] A Numerical Comparison of Different Methods for Evaluating Pipe Flanges Under External Loads
    Schneider, Ronald A.
    JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2024, 146 (02):
  • [36] PANCREATIC ENZYMES - NORMAL OUTPUT AND COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF ASSAY
    VEGHELYI, PV
    PEDIATRICS, 1949, 3 (06) : 749 - 763
  • [37] Pressure stress intensity at nozzles on cylindrical vessels: a comparison of calculation methods
    Dekker, CJ
    Stikvoort, WJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING, 1997, 74 (02) : 121 - 128
  • [38] Comparison of stress and total energy methods for calculation of elastic properties of semiconductors
    Caro, M. A.
    Schulz, S.
    O'Reilly, E. P.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER, 2013, 25 (02)
  • [39] Research for different crack width calculation methods of concrete-lined steel pressure pipe
    Xu, Chuang
    Li, Yang
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATERIALS SCIENCE, ENERGY TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (MSETEE 2017), 2017, 81
  • [40] Comparison and study of different seismic calculation methods for underground stations in Shanghai
    Li, Xin Xing
    Chen, Hong
    GEOSHANGHAI 2024 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, VOL 5, 2024, 1334