Comparison of different methods for normal stress calculation during pipe jacking/microtunneling

被引:3
|
作者
Khondoker, Md. Tareq Hossain [1 ]
Yi, Yaolin [1 ]
Bayat, Alireza [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
Pipe jacking; Microtunneling; Normal stress; Arching factor;
D O I
10.1080/19386362.2016.1147193
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Vertical earth load on pipes is an important factor during pipe jacking/microtunneling as it largely affects the jacking force. Although several methods can determine the normal load, the difference among them in calculating vertical normal stress is quite large. Hence, this paper provides an extensive analysis of nine different models/standards and their variations based on experimental data as well as a parametric study. The results show that some models predicted normal stress values close to the measured value, while others give much higher or lower values than the measurement. This discrepancy is due to the variation of assumptions of different methods. To identify the influence of parameters on normal stress, a parametric study is also conducted to reveal the effect of different parameters on arching factor as well as normal earth stress.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 376
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A MODEL CALCULATION OF SUPEREXCHANGE INTERACTION AND COMPARISON AMONG DIFFERENT METHODS
    FUCHIKAMI, N
    PHYSICA B & C, 1983, 115 (02): : 219 - 224
  • [22] Comparison of velocity measurements and different calculation methods in slit dies
    Lang, U
    Michaeli, W
    ANTEC'97 - PLASTICS SAVING PLANET EARTH, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 - 3, 1997, : 2289 - 2293
  • [23] Comparison of different calculation methods for structural stresses at welded joints
    Doerk, O
    Fricke, W
    Weissenborn, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2003, 25 (05) : 359 - 369
  • [24] Calculation of composite leading indicators: A comparison of two different methods
    Brunet, O
    ECONOMIC SURVEYS AND DATA ANALYSIS, 2002, : 123 - 133
  • [25] DIFFRACTION CORRECTIONS IN RADIOMETRY - COMPARISON OF 2 DIFFERENT METHODS OF CALCULATION
    BOIVIN, LP
    APPLIED OPTICS, 1975, 14 (08): : 2002 - 2009
  • [26] COMPARISON OF NORMAL EIGENMODES CALCULATION METHODS BASED ON IDENTIFIED COMPLEX EIGENMODES
    ZHANG, Q
    LALLEMENT, G
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1987, 24 (01) : 69 - 73
  • [27] A comparison of three different methods for measuring both normal stress differences of viscoelastic liquids in torsional rheometers
    Alcoutlabi, Mataz
    Baek, S. G.
    Magda, J. J.
    Shi, Xiangfu
    Hutcheson, S. A.
    McKenna, G. B.
    RHEOLOGICA ACTA, 2009, 48 (02) : 191 - 200
  • [28] A comparison of three different methods for measuring both normal stress differences of viscoelastic liquids in torsional rheometers
    Mataz Alcoutlabi
    S. G. Baek
    J. J. Magda
    Xiangfu Shi
    S. A. Hutcheson
    G. B. McKenna
    Rheologica Acta, 2009, 48 : 191 - 200
  • [29] Calculation of frequency-dependent parameters of pipe-type cables:: Comparison of methods
    da Silva, Daniel
    Fernandez, Ganimedes
    Rivas, Richard A.
    2006 IEEE/PES TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION CONFERENCE & EXPOSITION: LATIN AMERICA, VOLS 1-3, 2006, : 1541 - +
  • [30] Comparison of different dosimetric methods for tumor and normal tissue predicted absorbed dose calculation in liver radioembolization: preliminary results
    Finessi, M.
    Gallio, E.
    Richetta, E.
    Stasi, M.
    Pellerito, R.
    Ropolo, R.
    Bisi, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 : S240 - S241