THE THEORETICAL BASIS OF THE URBAN (COMMUNITY) SELF-GOVERNANCE

被引:0
|
作者
Csefko Ferenc
机构
来源
TER ES TARSADALOM | 2008年 / 22卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.17649/TET.22.1.1159
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The settlement centred self-govemance system created in 1990 built upon the self-governmental equality also during the delegation of task and authorities. The more than one and the half decade long experiences have proved that the tasks and functions fulfilled by different self-govemments must be revised. In the course of this revision the opportunity of differentiation provided for by the act on self-govemments must be utilised. Beyond that a new type of task division system shall be created specially for the different city types and sizes and their neighbourhoods, in which system the basic right of self govemance would remain due to every settlement but the pubic services would be settled in the cities and the urban communities formulated by the cities and their neighbourhood. This new type of delegation system would result that functional, delegation tiers would be newly defined like the capital city (and the urban community of its agglomeration) and the community of the settlements belonging to this circle; the pole centres and (their regional urban communities), and the settlements belonging to this circle; larger towns (and the urban community of their a region) and the settlements belonging to this circle; micro regional city centres (and the community of towns in their attraction arca) and the settlements belonging to this circle; centres of micro districts, towns without central functions (and their urban community) and the settlements belonging to this circle.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 123
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Study on Urban Community Self-governance in China: Problems and Solutions
    Zhang Lei
    Li Guo-qing
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (9TH), VOL I, 2013, : 189 - 196
  • [2] Urban neighborhood self-governance and community attachment: Evidence from southwest China
    Cheng, Xiuying
    Zhong, Wei
    Li, Dongquan
    [J]. CITIES, 2021, 112
  • [3] Community self-governance: Prerequisites, functions, evaluation
    Shagalov, Igor L.
    Rubin, Alexander Yu
    [J]. VOPROSY EKONOMIKI, 2019, (05): : 103 - 121
  • [4] URBAN SELF-GOVERNANCE: HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OR A RETURN TO THE PAST?
    Yesaulov, Vladimir N.
    Lizunkov, Vladislav G.
    [J]. VOPROSY ISTORII, 2019, (09) : 45 - 58
  • [5] Self-governance and healing
    Barrier, P.
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGIE, 2016, 10 (04) : 235 - 237
  • [6] Welfare and self-governance
    Skorupski J.
    [J]. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2006, 9 (3) : 289 - 309
  • [7] Sustainable Urban Community Development: A Case Study from the Perspective of Self-Governance and Public Participation
    Fu, Yang
    Ma, Weihong
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [8] Self-governance and cooperation
    Haji, I
    [J]. PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2003, 66 (02) : 498 - 501
  • [9] Self-governance and cooperation
    Cunningham, A
    [J]. MIND, 2001, 110 (439) : 799 - 802
  • [10] Self-governance and cooperation
    Murphy, L
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 2001, 110 (04): : 609 - 611