Urban neighborhood self-governance and community attachment: Evidence from southwest China

被引:16
|
作者
Cheng, Xiuying [1 ]
Zhong, Wei [2 ]
Li, Dongquan [1 ]
机构
[1] Renmin Univ China, Sch Publ Adm & Policy, 59 Zhongguancun St, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, 30 Shuangqing St, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Community building; Neighborhood self-governance; Community attachment; Community involvement; Community satisfaction; Urbanization; PLACE ATTACHMENT; SOCIAL-POLICY; PARTICIPATION; EMPOWERMENT; SENSE; SATISFACTION; LEGITIMACY; MODEL; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cities.2021.103128
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Rapid urbanization in China and the resultant social problems have prompted the government to experiment with ?community building?. One such experiment, attempting to introduce neighborhood self-governance, was conducted from 2009 to 2013 in southwest China. Based on long-term field research and a general social survey in four such communities, this study tested the strength of community attachment as the main indicator of community formation. At the same time, different factors that influence community attachment, including length of residence, social involvement within the community, and satisfaction with community infrastructure and public services were also analyzed to explore a feasible pathway in China to strengthen communities. The results indicated a general high level of community attachment. It also indicated that community involvement, including social bonds, community participation, and community empowerment, contributed most to the strength of community attachment. Evidence from this subdistrict shows that the state could certainly build up communities in a relatively short time. Nevertheless, the robust success of community formation still hinged on social and political participation in the form of neighborhood self-governance. This form of community building through prescribed participation directed by the authoritarian state pointed out a different route from the democratic path of community construction.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Study on Urban Community Self-governance in China: Problems and Solutions
    Zhang Lei
    Li Guo-qing
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (9TH), VOL I, 2013, : 189 - 196
  • [2] THE THEORETICAL BASIS OF THE URBAN (COMMUNITY) SELF-GOVERNANCE
    Csefko Ferenc
    [J]. TER ES TARSADALOM, 2008, 22 (01): : 109 - 123
  • [3] Democratic Localism: The Case of Grassroots Self-Governance in Urban China
    Wang Z.
    Liu J.
    Pavlićević D.
    [J]. Chinese Political Science Review, 2018, 3 (2) : 129 - 153
  • [4] Prospects for village self-governance in China
    Howell, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 1998, 25 (03): : 86 - 111
  • [5] On the Improvement of Villagers' Self-governance in China
    Zhang Su-fang
    Zhu Hong-bin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (5TH), VOL I, 2009, : 176 - 179
  • [6] Sustainable Urban Community Development: A Case Study from the Perspective of Self-Governance and Public Participation
    Fu, Yang
    Ma, Weihong
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [7] Practicing democratic citizenship in an authoritarian state: grassroots self-governance in urban China
    Xia, Ying
    Guan, Bing
    [J]. CITIZENSHIP STUDIES, 2017, 21 (07) : 809 - 823
  • [8] Community self-governance: Prerequisites, functions, evaluation
    Shagalov, Igor L.
    Rubin, Alexander Yu
    [J]. VOPROSY EKONOMIKI, 2019, (05): : 103 - 121
  • [9] The limits of self-governance when cooperators get punished: Experimental evidence from urban and rural Russia
    Gaechter, Simon
    Herrmann, Benedikt
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 55 (02) : 193 - 210
  • [10] URBAN SELF-GOVERNANCE: HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OR A RETURN TO THE PAST?
    Yesaulov, Vladimir N.
    Lizunkov, Vladislav G.
    [J]. VOPROSY ISTORII, 2019, (09) : 45 - 58