Benchmarking efficiency of public passenger transport in larger cities

被引:32
|
作者
Hilmola, Olli-Pekka [1 ]
机构
[1] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Kouvola Res Unit, Kouvola, Finland
关键词
Cities; Passenger transport; Benchmarking; Europe; Middle East; North America;
D O I
10.1108/14635771111109805
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate public transportation efficiency in larger cities. Global agreements to decrease environmental emissions in the future (CO2), world-wide decreasing reserves of oil, and growing population in larger cities is the main motivation to develop efficiency benchmarking measurement models for public transportation systems, and gives reason for this research work. Also, from the point of view of the city, data envelopment analysis (DEA) based efficiency measurement has not been researched earlier, which is another motivation for this study from the method development perspective. Design/methodology/approach - Four different DEA-based efficiency benchmarking models are used to evaluate public transportation efficiency in larger cities. Data are from year 2001, and amount of analyzed cities in smaller DEA model is 52 and in larger 43. This gives statistical significance and efficiency measurement confidence over the results. Findings - Medium-sized, old and central European cities such as Bern, Munich, Prague and Zurich show frontier performance in all four models. Mega-cities fail to reach frontier and/or good performance in small "services used" DEA model. However, some other medium-sized cities show contrarian behaviour for "space used" DEA model. Lowest performance is more divergent in the analyses, but is found from Spanish cities, Athens, Middle East and North America. The author also found support from regression analysis that higher DEA efficiency results in lower share of private car use in large cities. Research limitations/implications - This research work uses only year 2001 data, and should be repeated in the future as public transportation data18base is being updated. The research is also limited on the use of DEA method, and other efficiency measurement methods should be used to verify the results further. Originality/value - According to the author's knowledge, this research work is seminal from the city-level DEA efficiency benchmarking studies concerning public passenger transportation systems. Earlier research works have concerned actors (e.g. bus companies or rail operators), but the overall picture from the city level has not been researched before.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 41
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation System for the Implementation of Public Passenger Transport as a Public Service Obligation
    Blaz, Janez
    Zajc, Klemen
    Zupan, Samo
    Ambroz, Miha
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (12):
  • [42] The publicness of public transport: The changing nature of public transport in Latin American cities
    Paget-Seekins, Laurel
    Tironi, Manuel
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2016, 49 : 176 - 183
  • [43] The London Passenger Transport Board - A Public Transportation Trust
    Wilson, G. Lloyd
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1939, 201 : 118 - 123
  • [44] Distribution Pattern of Public Transport Passenger in Yogyakarta, Indonesia
    Narendra, Alfa
    Malkhamah, Siti
    Sopha, Bertha Maya
    [J]. ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (EIC2017), 2018, 1941
  • [45] Evaluation of Quality of City Public Passenger Transport Services
    Rayushkina, Alevtina
    Shiryaev, Sergey
    Avdeyuk, Oksana
    Tarasova, Irina
    [J]. 2017 TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MANAGEMENT OF LARGE-SCALE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT (MLSD), 2017,
  • [46] The concept of sustainable development of public passenger transport in Koszalin
    Korczak, Jerzy
    Kijewska, Kinga
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE GREEN CITIES - GREEN LOGISTICS FOR GREENER CITIES, 2016, 16 : 217 - 226
  • [47] A NEW INTELLIGENT PASSENGER INFORMATION PLATFORM FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORT
    Olczyk, Adrian
    Grzejszczak, Tomasz
    [J]. CLC 2013: CARPATHIAN LOGISTICS CONGRESS - CONGRESS PROCEEDINGS, 2014, : 567 - 571
  • [48] MODEL APPROACH TO QUALITY PROVISION OF PUBLIC PASSENGER TRANSPORT
    Krajnc, Roman
    Sever, Drago
    [J]. PROMET-TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION, 2010, 22 (01): : 65 - 74
  • [49] The Public Passenger Transport Development Strategy for Kaunas Region
    Butkevicius, J.
    [J]. TRANSPORT MEANS 2009, 2009, : 185 - 188
  • [50] User satisfaction about the public passenger transport service
    Romero-Torres, Javier
    Garcia Gutierrez, Javier
    Gaspar Sanchez, Noe
    [J]. REVISTA DE TRANSPORTE Y TERRITORIO, 2020, (22): : 114 - 131