Supply chain integration using a maturity scale

被引:27
|
作者
Aryee, Gilbert [1 ]
Naim, Mohamed M. [1 ]
Lalwani, Chandra [2 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Innovat Mfg Res Ctr, Cardiff Business Sch, Logist Syst Dynam Grp, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[2] Hull Univ, Hull Univ Business Sch, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England
关键词
Supply chain management; Manufacturing resource planning; Control system; Integration;
D O I
10.1108/17410380810877258
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose - Outsourcing of non-core activities and the subsequent vertical disintegration within manufacturing organisations have necessitated the need for process integration in the supply chain. The purpose of this paper is to develop a maturity scale to assess supply chain integration and hence improvement in supply chain performance. Design/methodology/approach - The research involved carrying out a questionnaire survey of UK manufacturing companies. In total, 29 responses were analysed. Findings - The insight gained from the research is that the "soft" collaborative issues rather than the "hard" technological issues are the main drivers to improved supply chain performance. Most of the companies surveyed are still grappling with internal process integration with very few companies achieving closer integration with their customers. Practical implications - Empirical evidence is found about an organisation's true stage of supply chain integration which affects its performance. Hard and soft variables or certain combinations of these do have a positive or negative effect on organisational performance. Originality/value - A maturity scale is developed to capture an organisation's stage of supply chain integration. This scale also draws on relationships with organisational performance. As a maturity scale, it also shows direction or migratory paths to higher stages of supply chain integration.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 575
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] eBusiness and supply chain integration
    Smart, Alan
    JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2008, 21 (03) : 227 - +
  • [32] A maturity model for supply chain risk management
    Guerra, Joao Henrique Lopes
    de Souza, Fernando Bernardi
    Pires, Silvio Roberto Ignacio
    de Sa, Anderson Luiz Ribeiro
    SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024, 29 (01) : 114 - 136
  • [33] Proposal of a Maturity Model for Supply Chain Sustainability
    Correia, Elisabete M. F.
    Azevedo, Susana G.
    Carvalho, Helena
    Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Electrical, Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (ICEMIE), 2016, 51 : 161 - 164
  • [34] A System Maturity Model for Supply Chain Management
    Umeda, Shigeki
    ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: THE PATH TO INTELLIGENT, COLLABORATIVE AND SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING, 2017, 514 : 3 - 10
  • [35] Military supply chain integration
    Li, L
    Chen, H
    Wang, JF
    Xu, QX
    2005 International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management, Vols 1 and 2, Proceedings, 2005, : 674 - 679
  • [36] Antecedents to Supply Chain Integration
    Duffy, Kevin P.
    Narayanan, S.
    AMCIS 2010 PROCEEDINGS, 2010,
  • [37] Supply chain management maturity and business models: scientific mapping using SciMAT
    Vasconcelos, Lucio Flavio
    Sigahi, Tiago F. A. C.
    Pinto, Jefferson de Souza
    Rampasso, Izabela Simon
    Anholon, Rosley
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2023,
  • [38] Supply chain practices and performance: the indirect effects of supply chain integration
    Sundram, Veera Pandiyan Kaliani
    Chandran, V. G. R.
    Bhatti, Muhammad Awais
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2016, 23 (06) : 1445 - 1471
  • [39] Supply chain integration and logistics performance: the role of supply chain dynamism
    Lee, Hee-Yong
    Seo, Young-Joon
    Dinwoodie, John
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2016, 27 (03) : 668 - 685
  • [40] ON THEORY IN SUPPLY CHAIN UNCERTAINTY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR SUPPLY CHAIN INTEGRATION
    Flynn, Barbara B.
    Koufteros, Xenophon
    Lu, Guanyi
    JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2016, 52 (03) : 3 - 27