Absorptive capacity and a failed cross-border M&A

被引:34
|
作者
Deng, Ping [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Maryville Univ St Louis, John E Simon Sch Business, Business Adm, St Louis, MO 63141 USA
[2] Shanghai Lixin Univ Commerce, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW | 2010年 / 33卷 / 07期
关键词
China; Acquisitions and mergers; Organizational development; Assets management;
D O I
10.1108/01409171011055771
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - Chinese companies are increasingly using cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) to source knowledge or strategic assets. For many, global acquisitions have proven to be highly problematic and value-destroying. The purpose of this paper is to address this critical acquisition failure issue from an absorptive capacity perspective. Design/methodology/approach - Guided by the framework that focuses on how acquiring a firm's weak absorptive capacity damages its ability to assimilate, integrate and apply external new knowledge, one high-profile Chinese failed acquisition: TCL acquisition of France's Thomson's TV business in 2004 is analyzed empirically. Findings - Acquisition performance of Chinese overseas M&A is found to be substantially affected by the acquiring firm's absorptive capacity at multiple dimensions. Research limitations/implications - The absorptive capacity construct provides an insightful account for differentials in Chinese overseas M&A performance. Practical implications - For decision makers interested in formulating and implementing overseas M&A strategy, appropriate evaluation of their own firms' absorptive capability should be the first step to take. Originality/value - This is the first paper to apply absorptive capacity arguments to Chinese resource-driven M&A strategy, and will prompt business academicians and practitioners to think about M&A strategy in new and innovative ways.
引用
收藏
页码:673 / 682
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Ecological Footprints of Greenfield FDI and Cross-border M&A Sales
    Nadia Doytch
    Ayesha Ashraf
    [J]. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 2022, 27 : 935 - 951
  • [22] Contracting Costs and Information Asymmetry Reduction in Cross-Border M&A
    Boeh, Kevin K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2011, 48 (03) : 568 - 590
  • [23] Exploring the factors influencing the negotiation process in cross-border M&A
    Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal
    Tarba, Shlomo Y.
    Liu, Yipeng
    Glaister, Keith W.
    Cooper, Cary L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2016, 25 (02) : 445 - 457
  • [24] The Ecological Footprints of Greenfield FDI and Cross-border M&A Sales
    Doytch, Nadia
    Ashraf, Ayesha
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2022, 27 (06) : 935 - 951
  • [25] DYNAMICS OF CROSS-BORDER M&A AS AN INCENTIVE TO DEVELOPMENT OF CROATIAN ECONOMY
    Tomic, Daniel
    [J]. EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA-ECONOMIC RESEARCH, 2009, 22 (01): : 134 - 148
  • [26] Mars-Venus marriages: Culture and cross-border M&A
    Chakrabarti, Rajesh
    Gupta-Mukherjee, Swasti
    Jayaraman, Narayanan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2009, 40 (02) : 216 - 236
  • [27] Chinese enterprise's wealth effect of cross-border M&A
    Yang, Xingrui
    [J]. ICITCE 2015 - 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND CAREER EDUCATION, 2016, 25
  • [28] The Search for Value: Cross-border Bank M&A in Emerging Markets
    Williams, Jonathan
    Liao, Angel
    [J]. COMPARATIVE ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2008, 50 (02) : 274 - 296
  • [29] GOVERNMENT CONTROL OF CROSS-BORDER M&A: LEGITIMATE REGULATION OR PROTECTIONISM?
    Heinemann, Andreas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW, 2012, 15 (03) : 843 - 870
  • [30] China's OFDI policy announcements and cross-border M&A
    Utesch-Xiong, Fredrik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2022, 17 (06) : 1522 - 1542